GHSA-hfxv-24rg-xrqf CVE-2026-44496
Axios: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via Cookie Name Injection
- Severity
- 7.5 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 5.41%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 92.69% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Fix
1.16.0- Upgrade axios to this version or later
Description
Summary
Axios versions before 0.32.0 on the 0.x line and before 1.16.0 on the 1.x line build a regular expression from the configured XSRF cookie name without escaping regex metacharacters. In standard browser environments, an attacker who can influence the cookie name passed to axios can cause expensive regex backtracking while axios reads document.cookie.
The practical impact is client-side availability degradation, such as freezing the affected browser tab while axios prepares a request. The issue does not affect ordinary Node.js HTTP adapter usage, React Native, or web workers, where axios does not read document.cookie.
Impact
Applications are affected only when attacker-controlled data can reach the XSRF cookie name configuration or a direct/unsafe call to the internal cookie helper.
This does not expose credentials, modify requests, or affect response integrity. The impact is availability only.
Affected Functionality
Affected code paths:
lib/helpers/cookies.jsread(name)in standard browser environments.lib/helpers/resolveConfig.jsin1.x, when browser XHR/fetch adapters resolve XSRF config.lib/adapters/xhr.jsin0.x, when the XHR adapter reads the configured XSRF cookie.- Direct use of
axios/unsafe/helpers/cookies.jsin1.x, if callers pass attacker-controlled names.
Unaffected code paths:
- Default static
xsrfCookieName: 'XSRF-TOKEN'when not attacker-controlled. - Requests with
xsrfCookieName: null. - Node HTTP adapter usage without browser
document.cookie. - React Native and web workers where axios does not use standard browser cookie access.
Technical Details
Affected versions interpolate the cookie name into a regex.
const match = document.cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));
Because name is not escaped, regex metacharacters in the cookie name are interpreted as regex syntax. A payload such as (.+)+$ can force catastrophic backtracking against document.cookie.
The fix avoids dynamic regex construction and parses document.cookie by splitting on ;, trimming leading whitespace, and comparing cookie names with exact string equality.
Proof of Concept of Attack
function vulnerableRead(name, cookie) {
const start = Date.now();
try {
cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));
} catch {}
return Date.now() - start;
}
for (const n of [20, 22, 24, 26, 28]) {
const cookie = 'x='.padEnd(n, 'a') + '!';
console.log(`${n}: ${vulnerableRead('(.+)+$', cookie)}ms`);
}
Expected result: timings grow rapidly as the cookie string length increases.
Workarounds
Set xsrfCookieName: null if the application does not need axios to read an XSRF cookie.
Do not derive xsrfCookieName from untrusted input. If a dynamic cookie name is unavoidable, validate it against a strict cookie-name allowlist before passing it to axios.
Avoid calling axios/unsafe/helpers/cookies.js directly with untrusted names
<details> <summary>Original Source</summary>
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via Cookie Name Injection
1. Title
ReDoS via Unsanitized Cookie Name in Dynamic Regular Expression Construction
2. Affected Software and Version
- Software: Axios
- Version: 1.15.0 (and potentially earlier versions)
- Component:
lib/helpers/cookies.js - Ecosystem: npm (Node.js / Browser)
3. Vulnerability Type / CWE
- Type: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
- CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
- CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
4. CVSS 3.1 Score
Score: 7.5 (High)
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Attack Vector | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low |
| Privileges Required | None |
| User Interaction | None |
| Scope | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality | None |
| Integrity | None |
| Availability | High |
5. Description
The cookies.read() function in lib/helpers/cookies.js constructs a regular expression dynamically using the name parameter without any sanitization or escaping of special regex characters. At line 33, the code passes the raw name value directly into new RegExp():
const match = document.cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));
An attacker who can control or influence the cookie name parameter (e.g., via XSRF cookie name configuration, prototype pollution of xsrfCookieName, or any code path where user input reaches cookies.read()) can inject a malicious regex pattern that causes catastrophic backtracking, leading to a Denial of Service condition.
With a crafted input of approximately 20-30 characters, the regex engine can be forced to consume several seconds to minutes of CPU time, effectively freezing the JavaScript event loop.
6. Root Cause Analysis
File: lib/helpers/cookies.js
Line: 33
read(name) {
if (typeof document === 'undefined') return null;
const match = document.cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));
return match ? decodeURIComponent(match[1]) : null;
},
The vulnerability exists because:
- The
nameparameter is concatenated directly into a regex pattern without escaping special regex metacharacters. - An attacker can inject regex constructs that create exponential backtracking scenarios.
- The
(?:^|; )prefix combined with an injected pattern like((((.*)*)*)*)*creates nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when the regex engine attempts to match againstdocument.cookie.
The cookies.read() function is called from lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js at line 61:
const xsrfValue = xsrfHeaderName && xsrfCookieName && cookies.read(xsrfCookieName);
The xsrfCookieName value comes from the Axios configuration, which can be influenced by prototype pollution or direct configuration injection.
7. Proof of Concept
// poc_redos_cookie.js
// Simulates browser environment for testing
// Simulate document.cookie
globalThis.document = {
cookie: 'session=abc; ' + 'a'.repeat(50)
};
// Replicate the vulnerable cookies.read() logic
function cookiesRead(name) {
const match = document.cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));
return match ? decodeURIComponent(match[1]) : null;
}
// Malicious cookie name that triggers catastrophic backtracking
// The pattern creates nested quantifiers: (a]|[a]|...)*)*
const maliciousName20 = '([^;]+)+$' + '\\|'.repeat(10);
const maliciousName = '(([^;])+)+\\$'; // nested quantifier pattern
console.log('=== ReDoS via Cookie Name Injection PoC ===');
// Test with increasing payload sizes
for (const len of [15, 20, 25]) {
const payload = '(([^;])+)+' + 'X'.repeat(len);
const start = Date.now();
try {
cookiesRead(payload);
} catch (e) {
// May throw on invalid regex, but valid evil patterns won't throw
}
const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
console.log(`Payload length ${len}: ${elapsed}ms`);
}
// Demonstrating exponential growth with a simple nested quantifier
console.log('\n--- Exponential Backtracking Demo ---');
for (const n of [20, 22, 24, 26]) {
const evilName = '(' + 'a'.repeat(1) + '+)+$';
const testCookie = 'a'.repeat(n) + '!'; // non-matching trailer forces backtracking
globalThis.document = { cookie: testCookie };
const start = Date.now();
try {
cookiesRead(evilName);
} catch(e) {}
const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
console.log(`Input length ${n}: ${elapsed}ms`);
}
8. PoC Output
=== ReDoS via Cookie Name Injection PoC ===
Payload length 20: 21ms (extrapolated: 30 chars = ~21,504ms)
Payload length 25: ~1,300ms
Payload length 30: ~323,675ms (5+ minutes)
--- Exponential Backtracking Demo ---
Input length 20: 21ms
Input length 22: 84ms
Input length 24: 336ms
Input length 26: 1,344ms
The exponential growth pattern is clearly visible: each additional 2 characters approximately quadruples the execution time.
9. Impact
- Denial of Service (Client-side): In a browser environment, an attacker who can influence the XSRF cookie name configuration (e.g., via prototype pollution or configuration injection) can freeze the browser tab, blocking all UI interaction and JavaScript execution on the page.
- Denial of Service (Server-side): In SSR (Server-Side Rendering) frameworks or Node.js applications that process cookies using this code path, the event loop will be blocked, causing the server to become unresponsive to all requests.
- Event Loop Starvation: Since JavaScript is single-threaded, the ReDoS will block all pending asynchronous operations, timers, and I/O callbacks for the duration of the regex evaluation.
10. Remediation / Suggested Fix
Escape all regex metacharacters in the name parameter before constructing the regular expression.
// FIXED: lib/helpers/cookies.js
function escapeRegExp(string) {
return string.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&');
}
// ...
read(name) {
if (typeof document === 'undefined') return null;
const match = document.cookie.match(
new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + escapeRegExp(name) + '=([^;]*)')
);
return match ? decodeURIComponent(match[1]) : null;
},
Alternatively, avoid dynamic regex construction entirely and use string-based parsing:
read(name) {
if (typeof document === 'undefined') return null;
const cookies = document.cookie.split('; ');
for (const cookie of cookies) {
const eqIndex = cookie.indexOf('=');
if (eqIndex !== -1 && cookie.substring(0, eqIndex) === name) {
return decodeURIComponent(cookie.substring(eqIndex + 1));
}
}
return null;
},
11. References
- CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
- CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
- OWASP: Regular Expression Denial of Service
- Axios GitHub Repository
</details>
Affected versions
npm
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
axios npm → 1.16.0
- npm
npm install axios@1.16.0- yarn
yarn add axios@1.16.0- pnpm
pnpm add axios@1.16.0
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
The product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use regular expressions that do not support backtracking, e.g. by removing nested quantifiers.
- System Configuration: Set backtracking limits in the configuration of the regular expression implementation, such as PHP's pcre.backtrack_limit. Also consider limits on execution time for the process.
- Implementation: Do not use regular expressions with untrusted input. If regular expressions must be used, avoid using backtracking in the expression.
- Implementation: Limit the length of the input that the regular expression will process.
CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
- Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
- Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
References
Packages
Other links
- github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-hfxv-24rg-xrqf
- github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v0.32.0
- github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.16.0
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20889
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20938
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:27044
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:27063
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28571
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28964
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29082
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29197
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30076
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30650
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30651
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33155
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33160
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33163
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33173
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33183
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33574
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33683
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34766
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36611
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36754
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36820
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36882
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36883
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41055
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41064
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41066
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41928
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41951
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42078
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42085
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42142
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42796
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:46885
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:46903
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:50300
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56789
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:57191
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:59360
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:59833
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:60520
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:66488
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:66545
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44496
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
- security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-44496.json
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-44g4-m2mj-wpvx Axios: CIDR-form NO_PROXY entries are ignored, causing proxy exclusion bypass for internal IP ranges | Medium | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-x97p-jq2g-jp4f Axios: Prototype Pollution Gadget in axios toFormData Options | High | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-vh66-26gq-q6x8 Axios: Prototype pollution gadget in fetch adapter can alter outbound requests | Medium | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-r4gj-5m52-g5wh Axios: maxRedirects: 0 is not enforced by the fetch adapter, allowing redirect-based SSRF | High | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-mghh-pgcx-3jjj Axios: ReDoS (O(N²)) in shouldBypassProxy host normalization, reachable via untrusted redirect Location | High | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-m8m8-qj5v-23w3 Axios: Node HTTP adapter prototype-pollution gadget allows request socket hijack via inherited createConnection | High | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-j8rh-479h-cp32 Axios: Header Injection via Inherited headers After Minimal Interceptor | Medium | Also affects axios |
| GHSA-c29m-xwm3-cm6r Axios: ReDoS in fromDataURI data: URL parser freezes the Node event loop (DoS) | High | Also affects axios |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor