Skip to content

GHSA-h78m-j95m-5356 BIT-cilium-2025-23047 BIT-cilium-operator-2025-23047 BIT-hubble-relay-2025-23047 CVE-2025-23047 GO-2025-3416

Cilium has an information leakage via insecure default Hubble UI CORS header

Medium Go
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.49%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 42.08% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Fix
1.14.19
Upgrade github.com/cilium/cilium to this version or later

Description

Impact

For users who deploy Hubble UI using either Cilium CLI or via the Cilium Helm chart, an insecure default Access-Control-Allow-Origin header value could lead to sensitive data exposure. A user with access to a Hubble UI instance affected by this issue could leak configuration details about the Kubernetes cluster which Hubble UI is monitoring, including node names, IP addresses, and other metadata about workloads and the cluster networking configuration. In order for this vulnerability to be exploited, a victim would have to first visit a malicious page.

Patches

This issue was patched in https://github.com/cilium/cilium/commit/a3489f190ba6e87b5336ee685fb6c80b1270d06d

This issue affects:

  • Cilium between v1.14.0 and v1.14.18 inclusive
  • Cilium between v1.15.0 and v1.15.12 inclusive
  • Cilium between v1.16.0 and v1.16.5 inclusive

This issue is patched in:

  • Cilium v1.14.19
  • Cilium v1.15.13
  • Cilium v1.16.6

Workarounds

Users who deploy Hubble UI using the Cilium Helm chart directly can remove the CORS headers from the Helm template as shown in the patch.

Acknowledgements

The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @ciffelia for reporting this issue and to @geakstr for the fix.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on Slack.

If you think you have found a vulnerability affecting Cilium, we strongly encourage you to report it to our security mailing list at security@cilium.io. This is a private mailing list for the Cilium security team, and your report will be treated as top priority.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/cilium/cilium
>= 1.14.0, < 1.14.19
1.14.19
github.com/cilium/cilium
>= 1.15.0, < 1.15.13
1.15.13
github.com/cilium/cilium
>= 1.16.0, < 1.16.6
1.16.6
github.com/cilium/cilium
>= 1.14.0, < 1.14.19
>= 1.15.0, < 1.15.13
>= 1.16.0, < 1.16.6
1.14.19
1.15.13
1.16.6

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/cilium/cilium Go → 1.14.19

go
go get github.com/cilium/cilium@v1.14.19 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-fm8w-2m5w-9j7r
Cilium may unexpectedly allow ingress traffic from the local namespace when a Kubernetes NetworkPolicy is configured with an ipBlock match
Medium Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-w7c2-w76w-5hmj
Cilium: Namespaced HTTPRoutes can redirect traffic to other namespaces
High Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-q6h5-q3q6-f87x
CiliumLocalRedirectPolicy addressMatcher allows cross-namespace service traffic hijacking and can break service translation
Medium Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-3fcv-jvfp-m4q9
Cilium vulnerable to sensitive information disclosure and cluster disruption via local Envoy admin socket access
High Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-gj49-89wh-h4gj
Cillium exposes sensitive information included in the cilium-bugtool debug archive
Medium Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-hxv8-4j4r-cqgv
Cilium L7 proxy may bypass Kubernetes NetworkPolicy for same-node traffic
Medium Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-5r23-prx4-mqg3
Cilium may not enforce host firewall policies when Native Routing, WireGuard and Node Encryption are enabled
Medium Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-38pp-6gcp-rqvm
Cilium with misconfigured toGroups in policies can lead to unrestricted egress traffic
Medium Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor