Skip to content

GHSA-gr35-vpx2-qxhc CVE-2025-64326 PYSEC-2025-126 PYSEC-2025-230

Weblate leaks the IP of project member inviting user to be reviewer in Audit log

Low PyPI
Severity
2.6 / 10
Low · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.20%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 9.71% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-212 Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Summary

Weblate leaks the IP address of the project member inviting the user to the project in the audit log.

Details

The audit log included IP addresses from admin-triggered actions, and those could be viewed by invited users.

Impact

The inviting user's (admin's) IP address could be leaked to invited users.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
late
< 5.14.1
5.14.1
weblate
< 5.14.1
5.14.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

late PyPI → 5.14.1

pip
pip install --upgrade "late>=5.14.1"
poetry
poetry add "late>=5.14.1"
uv
uv add "late>=5.14.1"

weblate PyPI → 5.14.1

pip
pip install --upgrade "weblate>=5.14.1"
poetry
poetry add "weblate>=5.14.1"
uv
uv add "weblate>=5.14.1"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 2.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-212: Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer

The product stores, transfers, or shares a resource that contains sensitive information, but it does not properly remove that information before the product makes the resource available to unauthorized actors.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements: Clearly specify which information should be regarded as private or sensitive, and require that the product offers functionality that allows the user to cleanse the sensitive information from the resource before it is published or exported to other parties.
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
  • Implementation, Operation: Some tools can automatically analyze documents to redact, strip, or "sanitize" private information, although some human review might be necessary. Tools may vary in terms of which document formats can be processed. When calling an external program to automatically generate or convert documents, invoke the program with any available options that avoid generating sensitive metadata. Some formats have well-defined fields that could contain private data, such as Exchangeable image file format (Exif), which can contain potentially sensitive metadata such as geolocation, date, and time [REF-1515] [REF-1516].
  • Implementation: Use naming conventions and strong types to make it easier to spot when sensitive data is being used. When creating structures, objects, or other complex entities, separate the sensitive and non-sensitive data as much as possible.
  • Implementation: Avoid errors related to improper resource shutdown or release (CWE-404), which may leave the sensitive data within the resource if it is in an incomplete state.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-2q2q-jr9g-v9rf
Weblate has IDOR in GroupViewSet that allows authenticated project manager to gain unauthorized read access to any private project
High Also affects weblate
GHSA-2p9g-x3cv-5hh4
Private Weblate projects vulnerable to observable object existence disclosure via globally scoped object lookups
Medium Also affects weblate
GHSA-vmfc-9982-2m45
Weblate SSRF: outbound URL guard misses some private ranges
Medium Also affects weblate
GHSA-6wxc-8mgq-w26m
Weblate: Stored HTML injection in editor search preview
Medium Also affects weblate
GHSA-5cmv-3rc4-7279
Weblate vulnerable to XSS via crafted Markdown
Medium Also affects weblate
GHSA-gcg5-86jr-f7jg
Weblate Vulnerable to Private Translation Enumeration via Screenshot API
Medium Also affects weblate
GHSA-cwcx-382v-8m9g
Weblate Vulnerable to Authenticated SSRF via Project Backup Import bypassing validate_repo_url
High Also affects weblate
GHSA-6j8j-4qp3-36p2
Weblate Doesn't Invalidate API Token on Password Change
Medium Also affects weblate
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor