GHSA-gp3w-2v2m-p686 CVE-2024-24560 PYSEC-2024-148
Vyper's external calls can overflow return data to return input buffer
- Severity
- 3.7 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.53%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 44.57% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
- Fix
0.4.0- Upgrade vyper to this version or later
Description
Summary
When calls to external contracts are made, we write the input buffer starting at byte 28, and allocate the return buffer to start at byte 0 (overlapping with the input buffer). When checking RETURNDATASIZE for dynamic types, the size is compared only to the minimum allowed size for that type, and not to the returned value's length. As a result, malformed return data can cause the contract to mistake data from the input buffer for returndata.
This advisory is given a severity of "Low" because when the called contract returns invalid ABIv2 encoded data, the calling contract can read different invalid data (from the dirty buffer) than the called contract returned.
Details
When arguments are packed for an external call, we create a buffer of size max(args, return_data) + 32. The input buffer is placed in this buffer (starting at byte 28), and the return buffer is allocated to start at byte 0. The assumption is that we can reuse the memory becase we will not be able to read past RETURNDATASIZE.
if fn_type.return_type is not None:
return_abi_t = calculate_type_for_external_return(fn_type.return_type).abi_type
# we use the same buffer for args and returndata,
# so allocate enough space here for the returndata too.
buflen = max(args_abi_t.size_bound(), return_abi_t.size_bound())
else:
buflen = args_abi_t.size_bound()
buflen += 32 # padding for the method id
When data is returned, we unpack the return data by starting at byte 0. We check that RETURNDATASIZE is greater than the minimum allowed for the returned type:
if not call_kwargs.skip_contract_check:
assertion = IRnode.from_list(
["assert", ["ge", "returndatasize", min_return_size]],
error_msg="returndatasize too small",
)
unpacker.append(assertion)
This check ensures that any dynamic types returned will have a size of at least 64. However, it does not verify that RETURNDATASIZE is as large as the length word of the dynamic type.
As a result, if a contract expects a dynamic type to be returned, and the part of the return data that is read as length includes a size that is larger than the actual RETURNDATASIZE, the return data read from the buffer will overrun the actual return data size and read from the input buffer.
Proof of Concept
This contract calls an external contract with two arguments. As the call is made, the buffer includes:
- byte 28: method_id
- byte 32: first argument (0)
- byte 64: second argument (hash)
The return data buffer begins at byte 0, and will return the returned bytestring, up to a maximum length of 96 bytes.
interface Zero:
def sneaky(a: uint256, b: bytes32) -> Bytes[96]: view
@external
def test_sneaky(z: address) -> Bytes[96]:
return Zero(z).sneaky(0, keccak256("oops"))
On the other side, imagine a simple contract that does not, in fact, return a bytestring, but instead returns two uint256s. I've implemented it in Solidity for ease of use with Foundry:
function sneaky(uint a, bytes32 b) external pure returns (uint, uint) {
return (32, 32);
}
The return data will be parsed as a bytestring. The first 32 will point us to byte 32 to read the length. The second 32 will be perceived as the length. It will then read the next 32 bytes from the return data buffer, even though those weren't a part of the return data.
Since these bytes will come from byte 64, we can see above that the hash was placed there in the input buffer.
If we run the following Foundry test, we can see that this does in fact happen:
function test__sneakyZeroReturn() public {
ZeroReturn z = new ZeroReturn();
c = SuperContract(deployer.deploy("src/loose/", "ret_overflow", ""));
console.logBytes(c.test_sneaky(address(z)));
}
Logs:
0xd54c03ccbc84dd6002c98c6df5a828e42272fc54b512ca20694392ca89c4d2c6
Patches
Patched in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3925, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4091, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4144, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4060.
Impact
Malicious or mistaken contracts returning the malformed data can result in overrunning the returned data and reading return data from the input buffer.
Affected versions
PyPI
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
vyper PyPI → 0.4.0
- pip
pip install --upgrade "vyper>=0.4.0"- poetry
poetry add "vyper>=0.4.0"- uv
uv add "vyper>=0.4.0"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 3.7
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.
How to prevent it
- Requirements: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
- Operation, Build and Compilation: Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
- Implementation: Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that the buffer is as large as specified. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space. If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.
- Operation, Build and Compilation: Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking. For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
- Operation: Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment. For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
- Implementation: Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-2r3x-4mrv-mcxf Vyper: Memory corruption using function calls within tuples / nested calls | Medium | Also affects vyper |
| GHSA-4v7v-gqf9-ww2g Vyper: Call stack corruption when passing complex type containing non-base type members as argument | Medium | Also affects vyper |
| GHSA-vg88-3v92-rjx2 Vyper: Return inside for loop more than 1 level deep | Low | Also affects vyper |
| GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0 | Low | Also affects vyper |
| GHSA-qhr6-mgqr-mchm Vyper's `concat()` builtin may elide side-effects for zero-length arguments | Low | Also affects vyper |
| GHSA-h33q-mhmp-8p67 Vyper has a double eval in For List Iter | High | Also affects vyper |
| GHSA-4w26-8p97-f4jp AugAssign evaluation order causing OOB write within the object in Vyper | Critical | Also affects vyper |
| GHSA-2p94-8669-xg86 Vyper's sqrt doesn't define rounding behavior | High | Also affects vyper |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor