Skip to content

GHSA-gj2r-phwg-6rww BIT-cilium-2023-39347 BIT-cilium-operator-2023-39347 BIT-cilium-proxy-2023-39347 BIT-hubble-2023-39347 BIT-hubble-relay-2023-39347 BIT-hubble-ui-2023-39347 BIT-hubble-ui-backend-2023-39347 CVE-2023-39347 GO-2023-2078

Kubernetes users may update Pod labels to bypass network policy

Critical Go
Severity
5.4 / 10
Critical · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.57%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 47.20% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Fix
1.13.7
Upgrade github.com/cilium/cilium to this version or later

Description

Impact

An attacker with the ability to update pod labels can cause Cilium to apply incorrect network policies.

This issue arises due to the fact that on pod update, Cilium incorrectly uses user-provided pod labels to select the policies which apply to the workload in question.

This can affect:

  • Cilium network policies that use the namespace, service account or cluster constructs to restrict traffic
  • Cilium clusterwide network policies that use Cilium namespace labels to select the Pod
  • Kubernetes network policies

Non-existent construct names can be provided, which bypass all network policies applicable to the construct. For example, providing a pod with a non-existent namespace as the value of the io.kubernetes.pod.namespace label results in none of the namespaced CiliumNetworkPolicies applying to the pod in question.

This attack requires the attacker to have Kubernetes API Server access, as described in the Cilium Threat Model.

Patches

This issue affects:

  • Cilium <= v1.14.1
  • Cilium <= v1.13.6
  • Cilium <= v1.12.13

This issue has been resolved in:

  • Cilium v1.14.2
  • Cilium v1.13.7
  • Cilium v1.12.14

Workarounds

An admission webhook can be used to prevent pod label updates to the k8s:io.kubernetes.pod.namespace and io.cilium.k8s.policy.* keys.

Acknowledgements

The Cilium community has worked together with members of Palantir and Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @odinuge for reporting this issue and to @nebril for the fix.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on Slack.

If you think you have found a vulnerability in Cilium, we strongly encourage you to report it to our private security mailing list – security@cilium.io – first, before disclosing them in any public forums. This is a private mailing list where only members of the Cilium internal security team are subscribed to, and is treated as top priority.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/cilium/cilium
>= 1.13.0, < 1.13.7
1.13.7
github.com/cilium/cilium
>= 1.14.0, < 1.14.2
1.14.2
github.com/cilium/cilium
< 1.12.14
1.12.14
github.com/cilium/cilium
< 1.12.14
>= 1.13.0, < 1.13.7
>= 1.14.0, < 1.14.2
1.12.14
1.13.7
1.14.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/cilium/cilium Go → 1.13.7

go
go get github.com/cilium/cilium@v1.13.7 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L

Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-fm8w-2m5w-9j7r
Cilium may unexpectedly allow ingress traffic from the local namespace when a Kubernetes NetworkPolicy is configured with an ipBlock match
Medium Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-w7c2-w76w-5hmj
Cilium: Namespaced HTTPRoutes can redirect traffic to other namespaces
High Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-q6h5-q3q6-f87x
CiliumLocalRedirectPolicy addressMatcher allows cross-namespace service traffic hijacking and can break service translation
Medium Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-3fcv-jvfp-m4q9
Cilium vulnerable to sensitive information disclosure and cluster disruption via local Envoy admin socket access
High Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-gj49-89wh-h4gj
Cillium exposes sensitive information included in the cilium-bugtool debug archive
Medium Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-hxv8-4j4r-cqgv
Cilium L7 proxy may bypass Kubernetes NetworkPolicy for same-node traffic
Medium Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-5r23-prx4-mqg3
Cilium may not enforce host firewall policies when Native Routing, WireGuard and Node Encryption are enabled
Medium Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
GHSA-38pp-6gcp-rqvm
Cilium with misconfigured toGroups in policies can lead to unrestricted egress traffic
Medium Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor