GHSA-gj2r-phwg-6rww BIT-cilium-2023-39347 BIT-cilium-operator-2023-39347 BIT-cilium-proxy-2023-39347 BIT-hubble-2023-39347 BIT-hubble-relay-2023-39347 BIT-hubble-ui-2023-39347 BIT-hubble-ui-backend-2023-39347 CVE-2023-39347 GO-2023-2078
Kubernetes users may update Pod labels to bypass network policy
- Severity
- 5.4 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.57%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 47.20% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
- Fix
1.13.7- Upgrade github.com/cilium/cilium to this version or later
Description
Impact
An attacker with the ability to update pod labels can cause Cilium to apply incorrect network policies.
This issue arises due to the fact that on pod update, Cilium incorrectly uses user-provided pod labels to select the policies which apply to the workload in question.
This can affect:
- Cilium network policies that use the namespace, service account or cluster constructs to restrict traffic
- Cilium clusterwide network policies that use Cilium namespace labels to select the Pod
- Kubernetes network policies
Non-existent construct names can be provided, which bypass all network policies applicable to the construct. For example, providing a pod with a non-existent namespace as the value of the io.kubernetes.pod.namespace label results in none of the namespaced CiliumNetworkPolicies applying to the pod in question.
This attack requires the attacker to have Kubernetes API Server access, as described in the Cilium Threat Model.
Patches
This issue affects:
- Cilium <= v1.14.1
- Cilium <= v1.13.6
- Cilium <= v1.12.13
This issue has been resolved in:
- Cilium v1.14.2
- Cilium v1.13.7
- Cilium v1.12.14
Workarounds
An admission webhook can be used to prevent pod label updates to the k8s:io.kubernetes.pod.namespace and io.cilium.k8s.policy.* keys.
Acknowledgements
The Cilium community has worked together with members of Palantir and Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @odinuge for reporting this issue and to @nebril for the fix.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on Slack.
If you think you have found a vulnerability in Cilium, we strongly encourage you to report it to our private security mailing list – security@cilium.io – first, before disclosing them in any public forums. This is a private mailing list where only members of the Cilium internal security team are subscribed to, and is treated as top priority.
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/cilium/cilium | >= 1.13.0, < 1.13.7 |
1.13.7 |
| github.com/cilium/cilium | >= 1.14.0, < 1.14.2 |
1.14.2 |
| github.com/cilium/cilium | < 1.12.14 |
1.12.14 |
| github.com/cilium/cilium | < 1.12.14>= 1.13.0, < 1.13.7>= 1.14.0, < 1.14.2 |
1.12.141.13.71.14.2 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/cilium/cilium Go → 1.13.7
- go
go get github.com/cilium/cilium@v1.13.7 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 5.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-fm8w-2m5w-9j7r Cilium may unexpectedly allow ingress traffic from the local namespace when a Kubernetes NetworkPolicy is configured with an ipBlock match | Medium | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-w7c2-w76w-5hmj Cilium: Namespaced HTTPRoutes can redirect traffic to other namespaces | High | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-q6h5-q3q6-f87x CiliumLocalRedirectPolicy addressMatcher allows cross-namespace service traffic hijacking and can break service translation | Medium | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-3fcv-jvfp-m4q9 Cilium vulnerable to sensitive information disclosure and cluster disruption via local Envoy admin socket access | High | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-gj49-89wh-h4gj Cillium exposes sensitive information included in the cilium-bugtool debug archive | Medium | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-hxv8-4j4r-cqgv Cilium L7 proxy may bypass Kubernetes NetworkPolicy for same-node traffic | Medium | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-5r23-prx4-mqg3 Cilium may not enforce host firewall policies when Native Routing, WireGuard and Node Encryption are enabled | Medium | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-38pp-6gcp-rqvm Cilium with misconfigured toGroups in policies can lead to unrestricted egress traffic | Medium | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor