Skip to content

GHSA-gcv3-5v9q-fmhh CVE-2026-41235

Froxlor has an authorization bypass in FTP shell assignment via missing server-side `available_shells` enforcement

High Packagist
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.23%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 13.57% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
Fix
2.3.7
Upgrade froxlor/froxlor to this version or later

Description

Summary

Froxlor 2.3.6 lets administrators configure system.available_shells as the approved shell list that customers may assign to FTP users. However, the server-side FTP account handlers do not enforce that whitelist when processing add or edit requests.

As a result, an authenticated customer with shell delegation enabled can submit an arbitrary shell such as /bin/bash even when the panel UI only offers more restricted choices. In deployments that use the default nssextrausers integration, the attacker-controlled shell is then propagated into the system account database, leading to real host shell access.

Details

The customer-facing FTP account page builds the shell selector from system.available_shells, which shows that the product intends the setting to act as the authorization boundary:

// customer_ftp.php:138-149
$shells = [
    '/bin/false' => '/bin/false'
];
$availableshells = explode(',', Settings::Get('system.available_shells'));
if (is_array($availableshells) && !empty($availableshells)) {
    foreach ($availableshells as $shell) {
        $shells[trim($shell)] = trim($shell);
    }
}

The request handler forwards posted form data directly into the FTP API command implementation:

// customer_ftp.php:170-172
if ($action == 'edit' && Request::post('send') == 'send') {
    $result = $log->logAction(USR_ACTION, LOG_INFO, "edited ftp-account #" . $id);
    Commands::get()->apiCall('Ftps.update', Request::postAll());
}

On the server side, Ftps::add() and Ftps::update() only perform generic shell string validation. They do not verify that the submitted shell belongs to system.available_shells:

// lib/Froxlor/Api/Commands/Ftps.php:119-123
if (Settings::Get('system.allow_customer_shell') == '1' && $this->getUserDetail('shell_allowed') == '1') {
    $shell = Validate::validate(trim($shell), 'shell', '', '', [], true);
} else {
    $shell = '/bin/false';
}

The validated shell is stored into ftp_users.shell and later consumed by the root-owned cron task that rebuilds NSS extrausers files:

// lib/Froxlor/Cron/System/Extrausers.php:89-97
$passwd_entries[] = $user['username'] . ':x:' . $uid . ':' . $gid . ':' . $gecos . ':' . $homedir . ':' . $shell;

Because the default installer configuration sets system.nssextrausers=1, and the shipped Debian/Bookworm configuration enables extrausers in nsswitch.conf, the attacker-controlled shell becomes the effective login shell of the generated system user on standard supported deployments.

PoC

An attacker needs a normal customer account and a deployment where customer shell delegation is enabled for that customer.

Relevant runtime prerequisites:

  • system.allow_customer_shell=1
  • the attacking customer has shell_allowed=1
  • the deployment uses system.nssextrausers=1 with the shipped libnss-extrausers integration

Froxlor requires a valid CSRF token for POST requests, so the attacker performs the exploit from an authenticated session.

Complete PoC flow:

  1. Log in as a customer and obtain a valid csrf_token.
  2. Identify one FTP account owned by that customer.
  3. Submit an edit request that sets an arbitrary shell outside the administrator-approved system.available_shells list:
POST /customer_ftp.php?page=accounts&action=edit&id=17 HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Cookie: <authenticated customer session>

csrf_token=VALID_CSRF_TOKEN&
send=send&
id=17&
username=test1ftp1&
ftp_description=poc&
path=/&
shell=/bin/bash&
login_enabled=1
  1. Wait for Froxlor's master cron to process the queued REBUILD_NSSUSERS task.

Result:

  • the request is accepted even if /bin/bash is not present in system.available_shells
  • ftp_users.shell is updated to /bin/bash
  • /var/lib/extrausers/passwd is regenerated with /bin/bash as the FTP user's login shell
  • the attacker can then authenticate to the host using that FTP user's credentials and obtain an interactive shell

Impact

This issue lets a low-privileged customer bypass an administrator-defined authorization boundary and promote an FTP-only account into a real shell account. On shared-hosting systems managed by Froxlor, that materially changes the trust model and can expose the host to lateral movement, local privilege-escalation follow-on attacks, data theft from colocated services, and persistence on the server.

Because the vulnerable flow is executed through the normal authenticated web interface and a root-owned provisioning task later materializes the chosen shell at the operating-system level, the vulnerability is stronger than a UI-only restriction bypass.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
froxlor/froxlor
>= 2.3.6, < 2.3.7
2.3.7

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

froxlor/froxlor Packagist → 2.3.7

composer
composer require froxlor/froxlor:^2.3.7

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
High
Integrity (subsequent systems)
High
Availability (subsequent systems)
High
Exploit maturity
Proof of concept

CVSS 3.1 8.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7788-ghfq-c6mh
Froxlor: Credential and 2FA secret disclosure via Froxlor API endpoints
Critical Also affects froxlor/froxlor
GHSA-xpr4-8vp6-c87j
Froxlor has CSRF Vulnerability in AJAX Endpoint — Missing Cross-Site Request Forgery Protection
Medium Also affects froxlor/froxlor
GHSA-5rw4-4665-cvwf
Froxlor DomainZones.add allows DNS zone-file RR injection via record/type fields
Medium Also affects froxlor/froxlor
GHSA-w27m-rmmf-g5w4
Froxlor: Second-Order SQL Injection via `Admins.add` `ipaddress` Parameter Allows Full Database Exfiltration
High Also affects froxlor/froxlor
GHSA-43gm-9rr3-cx7g
Froxlor: Stored XSS in DNS TXT Record Content Allows Customer-to-Admin Account Takeover
High Also affects froxlor/froxlor
GHSA-q4rm-m6xh-5pv7
Froxlor customer can create MySQL databases on disallowed servers via Mysqls.add API
Medium Also affects froxlor/froxlor
GHSA-mr9h-45p9-fg8h
Froxlor: Authenticated customers can read other customers' allowed sender aliases
Medium Also affects froxlor/froxlor
GHSA-f9rx-7wf7-jr36
Froxlor's API Authentication bypasses 2FA Authentication
High Also affects froxlor/froxlor
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor