Skip to content

GHSA-g9g6-qhrc-p3qc CVE-2026-58422 GO-2026-6056

Gitea: Improper authorization on OAuth sign-in callback silently re-enables administrator-disabled accounts

Critical Go
Severity
0.0 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.43%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 37.28% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-284 Improper Access Control
Fix
1.26.4
Upgrade code.gitea.io/gitea to this version or later

Description

Summary

The OAuth2 sign-in callback in Gitea 1.26.1 unconditionally re-enables a locally-disabled account whenever the user authenticates through a linked external identity provider, silently undoing any administrator-initiated Disable Account action and issuing a fresh authenticated session in the same response. Once a user has linked any external IdP, the administrator's disable toggle becomes non-binding — the user can re-enable themselves on demand by completing one OAuth callback, regaining full read and write access to their repositories, organizations, and access tokens.

Details

Improper Authorization is present on the code and state parameters of the /user/oauth2/{source-name}/callback endpoint in Gitea version 1.26.1. The handler routers/web/auth/oauth.go::handleOAuth2SignIn reads the local user's IsActive flag at lines 350-352 and, when it is false, sets opts.IsActive = optional.Some(true) before calling user_service.UpdateUser and immediately establishing a session. The active-state precondition that the request middleware routers/web/web.go::verifyAuthWithOptions enforces for every other request is therefore evaluated against the freshly-flipped row on the next request, so a site administrator's "disable user" action is silently undone the next time the user authenticates through any linked external identity provider.

The root cause is that the callback path treats the local IsActive flag as stale bookkeeping to reconcile against the external identity, rather than as an authoritative administrative override. The local-credential sign-in path correctly renders IsErrUserInactive in the same condition; only the OAuth callback path flips the flag and proceeds.

PoC

  1. As a site administrator, configure an OAuth2 authentication source via Site Administration -> Authentication Sources -> Add Authentication Source. Any external provider works (a self-hosted Keycloak, an upstream Gitea acting as OIDC, GitHub, GitLab, Microsoft, Google).
  2. Have a normal user (alice in the example) sign in through that source at least once. The callback creates the row in external_login_user linking alice's local account to the IdP identity.
  3. As the site administrator, disable alice's account: Site Administration -> User Accounts -> alice -> "Disable Account". Confirm the flag is set with the admin API.

HTTP REQUEST

GET /api/v1/admin/users/alice HTTP/1.1
Host: <HOST>
Authorization: token <ADMIN_TOKEN>
Accept: application/json

HTTP RESPONSE

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/json;charset=utf-8

{"id":2,"login":"alice","active":false,...}
  1. Have alice click "Sign in with <source-name>" on the Gitea login page and complete the OAuth dance with the IdP. The callback handler runs, observes IsActive=false, sets opts.IsActive=true, calls UpdateUser, and issues a session on the same response. Alice lands on /.
  2. Re-read the same admin API endpoint and observe that active has flipped back to true without administrator action.

HTTP REQUEST

GET /api/v1/admin/users/alice HTTP/1.1
Host: <HOST>
Authorization: token <ADMIN_TOKEN>
Accept: application/json

HTTP RESPONSE

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/json;charset=utf-8

{"id":2,"login":"alice","active":true,...}

Impact

Once a user has linked any external identity provider, the site administrator's "disable user" toggle becomes non-binding on that account: the user can re-enable themselves on demand by completing one OAuth callback, regaining full read and write access to their repositories, organizations, and tokens. In SSO-fronted Gitea deployments where the disable toggle is the documented incident-response action for compromised accounts or departed employees, this defeats the only short-term remediation available before the identity provider can revoke the underlying federated identity.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
code.gitea.io/gitea
< 1.26.4
1.26.4

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

code.gitea.io/gitea Go → 1.26.4

go
go get code.gitea.io/gitea@v1.26.4 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 9.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-284: Improper Access Control

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-rcr6-4jqh-j84m
Gitea: Remote Code Execution via diffpatch Git Hook Installation
Critical Known exploited Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-fq2p-5p22-8g6j
Gitea: Public-Only Personal access tokens scope bypass in Organization and Permission Endpoints
Medium Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-2wm4-vwp6-v7xc
Gitea: SSRF via Migration Asset Downloads Bypasses hostmatcher — Reads Internal Files and Cloud Metadata
High Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-3r5c-2xxx-h872
Gitea: Webhook Authorization Header Returned in Plaintext via API
Low Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-frpw-3h2q-4jj6
Gitea: Cross-Repo Information Disclosure via Org-Level Actions Run/Job APIs
Medium Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-q423-49rw-g9mh
Gitea: GHSA-8fwc-qjw5-rvgp ClearRepoWatches fix not applied to API EditRepo path — sister code path retains stale watches on public->private
Medium Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-2fcr-jfvc-vgg2
Gitea: Two SSRF findings
High Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
GHSA-fw57-jgch-pgf3
Gitea: ParseAcceptLanguage quadratic-time DoS via Locale middleware on unauthenticated requests
High Also affects code.gitea.io/gitea
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor