GHSA-fc33-6w3q-538h CVE-2026-55462
Snipe-IT has an authorization bypass on print inventory page
- Severity
- 4.3 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.34%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 27.74% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
- Fix
8.6.1- Upgrade snipe/snipe-it to this version or later
Description
Impact
An authenticated user with only users.view can open another user's detail page and see assigned license, accessory, and consumable data even though the same account is denied direct access to the Licenses, Accessories, and Consumables modules. The leaked data includes software license names, purchase order/order values, accessory and consumable names, assignment notes, and purchase costs.
Attacker Model
Authenticated user with only:
{"users.view":"1"}
The attacker does not have:
{
"licenses.view": "1",
"accessories.view": "1",
"consumables.view": "1",
"assets.view": "1"
}
Affected Component
-
app/Http/Controllers/Users/UsersController.php -
resources/views/users/view.blade.php -
resources/views/users/print.blade.php -
Endpoints:
-
GET /users/{user} -
GET /users/{user}/print
-
Root Cause
UsersController::show() authorizes only viewing the user, then loads inventory relationships:
$this->authorize('view', $user);
$user = User::with([
'consumables',
'accessories',
'licenses',
'userloc',
'groups',
])
resources/views/users/view.blade.php renders those relationships without checking the corresponding module permissions. The license table renders name, purchase cost, purchase order, and order number. The accessory and consumable tables render item names, notes, and unit costs.
UsersController::printInventory() similarly authorizes only view on User::class and the target user, then renders resources/views/users/print.blade.php, which outputs assigned inventory names.
Proof of Concept
-
Create a user with only
users.view. -
Create a target user with assigned license/accessory/consumable records containing recognizable test values.
-
Log in as the
users.view-only user. -
Confirm direct module access is denied:
GET /licenses
GET /accessories
GET /consumables
Observed for each:
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
- Request the target user's page:
GET /users/<target-user-id> HTTP/1.1
Host: <snipe-it-host>
Cookie: snipeit_session=<attacker-session>
Observed:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
The response contained assigned inventory data from modules the attacker could not directly access, including license name, purchase order/order values, accessory name/note/cost, and consumable name/note/cost.
- Request the print view:
GET /users/<target-user-id>/print HTTP/1.1
Host: <snipe-it-host>
Cookie: snipeit_session=<attacker-session>
Observed:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
The response contained assigned inventory names.
Evidence
The users.view-only test account was confirmed to lack direct inventory permissions:
{
"has_users_view": true,
"has_licenses_view": false,
"has_accessories_view": false,
"has_consumables_view": false,
"has_assets_view": false
}
Direct access to /licenses, /accessories, and /consumables returned 403 Forbidden.
The same account received 200 OK from /users/<target-user-id> and the response included assigned inventory data that should have been protected by the corresponding inventory module permissions.
Negative Controls
Denied direct module responses did not include the test inventory strings. The same data was only disclosed through the user detail and user print views.
Impact
Organizations may use separate permissions to allow HR/helpdesk-style users to view people records without exposing license, accessory, or consumable inventories and cost/order metadata. This issue bypasses those module-specific permissions and leaks assigned inventory information through the user view.
Patches
Patched in 374f426f0c
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| snipe/snipe-it | < 8.6.1 |
8.6.1 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
snipe/snipe-it Packagist → 8.6.1
- composer
composer require snipe/snipe-it:^8.6.1
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 4.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-396x-xmvh-p563 Snipe-IT: Stored XSS via Inline XML Rendering in the Uploaded Files API | Medium | Also affects snipe/snipe-it |
| GHSA-p9h3-gvpq-5539 Snipe-IT: Stored XSS via Custom Field name in asset-list column headers | High | Also affects snipe/snipe-it |
| GHSA-hxcx-9h4f-42xx Snipe-IT: 2FA bypass via the API token flow | High | Also affects snipe/snipe-it |
| GHSA-c8qc-wf67-342w Snipe-IT: Stored DOM XSS via table selected-count IDs | Medium | Also affects snipe/snipe-it |
| GHSA-r9r3-g9fp-3q4q Snipe-IT: Maintenance Record Disclosure via Missing Authorization on GET | Medium | Also affects snipe/snipe-it |
| GHSA-3hgv-jr5j-cg9x Snipe-IT: Chained Information Disclosure and IDOR Leads to Full EULA File Takeover | Medium | Also affects snipe/snipe-it |
| GHSA-c6w2-j4wq-mvwg Snipe-IT: Tenant Isolation Bypass in FMCS Floater Mode | High | Also affects snipe/snipe-it |
| GHSA-35cr-9hqq-p2mg Snipe-IT: Cross-company deletion of pending checkout acceptances via unscoped report endpoint | Medium | Also affects snipe/snipe-it |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor