Skip to content

GHSA-crrq-vr9j-fxxh BIT-parse-2022-31112 CVE-2022-31112

Protected fields exposed via LiveQuery

High npm
Severity
8.2 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.34%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 71.20% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-212 Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer
Fix
4.10.13
Upgrade parse-server to this version or later

Description

Impact

Parse Server LiveQuery does not remove protected fields in classes, passing them to the client.

Patches

The LiveQueryController now removes protected fields from the client response.

Workarounds

Use Parse.Cloud.afterLiveQueryEvent to manually remove protected fields.

References

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
parse-server
< 4.10.13
4.10.13
parse-server
>= 5.0.0, < 5.2.4
5.2.4

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

parse-server npm → 4.10.13

npm
npm install parse-server@4.10.13
yarn
yarn add parse-server@4.10.13
pnpm
pnpm add parse-server@4.10.13

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.2

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-212: Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer

The product stores, transfers, or shares a resource that contains sensitive information, but it does not properly remove that information before the product makes the resource available to unauthorized actors.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements: Clearly specify which information should be regarded as private or sensitive, and require that the product offers functionality that allows the user to cleanse the sensitive information from the resource before it is published or exported to other parties.
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
  • Implementation, Operation: Some tools can automatically analyze documents to redact, strip, or "sanitize" private information, although some human review might be necessary. Tools may vary in terms of which document formats can be processed. When calling an external program to automatically generate or convert documents, invoke the program with any available options that avoid generating sensitive metadata. Some formats have well-defined fields that could contain private data, such as Exchangeable image file format (Exif), which can contain potentially sensitive metadata such as geolocation, date, and time [REF-1515] [REF-1516].
  • Implementation: Use naming conventions and strong types to make it easier to spot when sensitive data is being used. When creating structures, objects, or other complex entities, separate the sensitive and non-sensitive data as much as possible.
  • Implementation: Avoid errors related to improper resource shutdown or release (CWE-404), which may leave the sensitive data within the resource if it is in an incomplete state.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-r899-h629-j84r
Parse Server vulnerable to stored XSS via malformed Content-Type bypassing file upload extension blocklist
Low Also affects parse-server
GHSA-97pr-9hgg-3p8r
parse-server: LiveQuery discloses object data to a subscriber across an ACL read-access change
Low Also affects parse-server
GHSA-v8x7-r927-cc93
parse-server: Stored XSS via non-standard file extension bypassing file upload extension blocklist
Low Also affects parse-server
GHSA-cgxm-vr2f-6fj8
parse-server: Denial of service via exponential-time processing of deeply nested query operators
High Also affects parse-server
GHSA-wmwx-jr2p-4j4r
parse-server: Relation `$relatedTo` query bypasses `protectedFields` and owning-object ACL
Medium Also affects parse-server
GHSA-75v4-m273-5j49
parse-server: Endpoints `/login` and `/verifyPassword` disclose MFA secrets and protected fields when `_User` get is denied
Medium Also affects parse-server
GHSA-7wqv-xjf3-x35v
parse-server: Stored XSS via trailing-dot filename bypassing file upload extension blocklist
Low Also affects parse-server
GHSA-p84r-h6rx-f2xr
parse-server: Server option routeAllowList is bypassable through batch sub-requests
Medium Also affects parse-server
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor