Skip to content

GHSA-ccv6-r384-xp75 CVE-2026-55447 PYSEC-2026-378

Langflow: BaseFileComponent-based nodes arbitrary file read with RCE exploit

Critical PyPI
Severity
9.6 / 10
Critical · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.66%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 51.69% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-61 UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following
Fix
1.9.2
Upgrade langflow to this version or later

Description

Summary

All components based on BaseFileComponent are vulnerable to the following vulnerability:

  1. Docling (DoclingInlineComponent)
  2. Docling Serve (DoclingRemoteComponent)
  3. Read File (FileComponent)
  4. NVIDIA Retriever Extraction (NvidiaIngestComponent)
  5. Video File (VideoFileComponent)
  6. Unstructured API (UnstructuredComponent)

For clarity, from now on I'll only refer to Read File component.

The Read File node processes user-controlled files. Example scenario is a RAG chatbot - a system that allows users of an organization to ask questions about documents saved in the organizations.

By controlling a files that are digested into the RAG, an attacker can direct the node to read any file on the file-system by absolute path.

Using this vulnerability an attacker can acheive RCE:

  1. Upload a file that directs the node to read Langflow's secret_key file containing the JWT token secret.
  2. This would allow the attacker then to simply task the Chatbot for the JWT secret.
  3. Using this secret, the attacker then crafts a JWT token for any user-id, bypassing authentication.
  4. Code execution is then trivial - simply create a new flow with "Python Interpreter" node, fill it with arbitrary Python code and execute it.

Tested on commit 2d67402b1dbaefcbce85a244d4a6cd5e4bda1cfe

Details

The vulnerability is in: langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/base/data/base_file.py Specifically in _unpack_bundle. This function extracts tar files, which can contain a symlink. This symlink can point to any file in the filesystem. Then, in self.process_files(), the file pointed by the symlink will be parsed and saved into the RAG. This can be done with unlimited number of symlinks in the same tar which can also be useful in some scenarios.

Suggestd fix - iterate over the files and make sure all are regular files or directories.

PoC

Reproduction:

  1. Create a flow with Read File (or any other affected components), and connect its output to some storage such as Chroma DB.
  2. Create a symlink pointing to any file. For the above exploit, point the symlink to langflow's JWT token file.
  3. Compress this symlink with tar.
  4. Upload it to the Read File component.
  5. Check the database, or ask a Chatbot connected to this vector database for the contents of the file.

Concrete PoC:

  • Flow with RAG ingestion and a Chatbot around it: Vector Store RAG.json
  • Exploit tar: archive.tar.txt (remove .txt, GitHub blocked .tar)
  • Create a file /tmp/trip.docx with any contents in it
  • Ingest the file in the flow above, and ask the Chatbot a question about this file.

A demo showing the attack: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/af00f700-f13f-4eac-848e-8afd11fb9297 In the demo the attacker steals Langflow secret key used to sign JWTs. The second stage of the attack, not shown in the demo, is using this key to sign a JWT token and executing Python code on the server using the Python code interpreter node.

Impact

Any Langflow user using any of the above mentioned components to ingest user-controlled data is affected. Depending on exact scenario, the user can also be exposed to an RCE risk.

Patches

Fixed in 1.9.2 via PR #12945. BaseFileComponent._unpack_bundle now rejects symlink and hardlink members (and any non-regular entries) during TAR extraction, with additional defensive symlink filtering during directory recursion and after extraction. Upgrade to 1.9.2 or later.

Ori Lahav Security Researcher @ Rubrik Inc.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
langflow
< 1.9.2
1.9.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

langflow PyPI → 1.9.2

pip
pip install --upgrade "langflow>=1.9.2"
poetry
poetry add "langflow>=1.9.2"
uv
uv add "langflow>=1.9.2"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 9.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-61: UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following

The product, when opening a file or directory, does not sufficiently account for when the file is a symbolic link that resolves to a target outside of the intended control sphere. This could allow an attacker to cause the product to operate on unauthorized files.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Symbolic link attacks often occur when a program creates a tmp directory that stores files/links. Access to the directory should be restricted to the program as to prevent attackers from manipulating the files.
  • Architecture and Design: Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system. Denying access to a file can prevent an attacker from replacing that file with a link to a sensitive file. Ensure good compartmentalization in the system to provide protected areas that can be trusted.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-qrpv-q767-xqq2
Langflow: IDOR Vulnerability in `/api/v1/responses` Endpoint Allows Authenticated Attackers to Access Another User's Flow
High Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-vwmf-pq79-vjvx
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in Langflow via Public Flow Build Endpoint
Critical Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-g22f-v6f7-2hrh
Langflow affected by Remote Code Execution via validate_code() exec()
High Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-577h-p2hh-v4mv
Langflow CORS misconfiguration enables Account Takeover and RCE
Critical Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-rvqx-wpfh-mfx7
Langflow Unauth RCE
Critical Known exploited Also affects langflow
GHSA-j8f7-x8jm-wmm4
Langflow: SSRF in URL-taking components (protection disabled by default / warn-only, not applied to RSS, SearXNG, Web Search, Home Assistant, Glean, Docling)
Medium Also affects langflow
GHSA-4f6c-2vvp-gw82
Langflow: IP Spoofing Bypass via `X-Forwarded-For` Allowing Remote Configuration Write
High Also affects langflow
GHSA-4hmc-cfm3-w43c
Langflow has Authenticated Cross-Project File Disclosure via Unscoped MCP Resource Handlers
High Also affects langflow
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor