Skip to content

GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975 CVE-2025-22150

Use of Insufficiently Random Values in undici

Medium npm
Severity
6.8 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.76%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 55.39% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-330 Use of Insufficiently Random Values
Fix
5.28.5
Upgrade undici to this version or later

Description

Impact

Undici fetch() uses Math.random() to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of Math.random() can be predicted if several of its generated values are known.

If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, An attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met.

Patches

This is fixed in 5.28.5; 6.21.1; 7.2.3.

Workarounds

Do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers.

References

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
undici
>= 4.5.0, < 5.28.5
5.28.5
undici
>= 6.0.0, < 6.21.1
6.21.1
undici
>= 7.0.0, < 7.2.3
7.2.3

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

undici npm → 5.28.5

npm
npm install undici@5.28.5
yarn
yarn add undici@5.28.5
pnpm
pnpm add undici@5.28.5

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values

The product uses insufficiently random numbers or values in a security context that depends on unpredictable numbers.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and select well-tested implementations with adequate length seeds. In general, if a pseudo-random number generator is not advertised as being cryptographically secure, then it is probably a statistical PRNG and should not be used in security-sensitive contexts. Pseudo-random number generators can produce predictable numbers if the generator is known and the seed can be guessed. A 256-bit seed is a good starting point for producing a "random enough" number.
  • Implementation: Consider a PRNG that re-seeds itself as needed from high quality pseudo-random output sources, such as hardware devices.
  • Architecture and Design, Requirements: Use products or modules that conform to FIPS 140-2 [REF-267] to avoid obvious entropy problems. Consult FIPS 140-2 Annex C ("Approved Random Number Generators").

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-55wc-3pg8-jfw6
undici vulnerable to Denial of Service via unhandled exception in the decompress interceptor
High Also affects undici
GHSA-qrxm-fqhp-jwvm
undici vulnerable to Denial of Service via TLS 1.2 certificate-changing renegotiation
High Also affects undici
GHSA-9fm3-97px-rjf6
undici WebSocket client vulnerable to Denial of Service via unbounded automatic PONG buffering
High Also affects undici
GHSA-4qv8-2p9j-2685
undici vulnerable to Denial of Service via unbounded memory in the EventSource parser
High Also affects undici
GHSA-xjj6-f33q-929c
undici vulnerable to Denial of Service via unhandled error on excessive content-encodings
High Also affects undici
GHSA-f72v-6w45-q472
undici vulnerable to Subresource Integrity bypass via non-lowercase algorithm tokens
High Also affects undici
GHSA-4w7w-5xrc-9h26
undici vulnerable to cache poisoning and cross-user disclosure via cross-origin redirects
Critical Also affects undici
GHSA-2m5v-pch6-74hx
undici vulnerable to TLS certificate validation bypass via dropped tls options in Agent
Critical Also affects undici
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor