Skip to content

GHSA-9x9j-vrhj-v364 CVE-2022-28731

Apache JSPWiki CSRF due to crafted request on UserPreferences.jsp

Medium Maven
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
58.72%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 99.10% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Fix
2.11.3
Upgrade org.apache.jspwiki:jspwiki-main to this version or later

Description

A carefully crafted request on UserPreferences.jsp could trigger an CSRF vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki before 2.11.3, which could allow the attacker to modify the email associated with the attacked account, and then a reset password request from the login page.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.apache.jspwiki:jspwiki-main
< 2.11.3
2.11.3

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.apache.jspwiki:jspwiki-main Maven → 2.11.3

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.jspwiki</groupId><artifactId>jspwiki-main</artifactId><version>2.11.3</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.jspwiki:jspwiki-main:2.11.3")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
  • Implementation: Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
  • Architecture and Design: Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
  • Architecture and Design: Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
  • Architecture and Design: Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same. Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
  • Architecture and Design: Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
  • Implementation: Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-72ww-4rcw-mc62
Apache JSPWiki Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability in the Image Plugin
Medium Also affects org.apache.jspwiki:jspwiki-main
GHSA-rrff-chj9-w4c7
Apache JSPWiki Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability via Header Link Rendering
High Also affects org.apache.jspwiki:jspwiki-main
GHSA-36gf-vpj2-j42w
Cross site scripting in Apache JSPWiki
Medium Also affects org.apache.jspwiki:jspwiki-main
GHSA-qvq8-cw7f-m7m4
Apache JSPWiki vulnerable to cross-site scripting on several plugins
Medium Also affects org.apache.jspwiki:jspwiki-main
GHSA-jp3m-p26h-mm7v
Apache JSPWiki CSRF due to crafted invocation on the Image plugin
High Also affects org.apache.jspwiki:jspwiki-main
GHSA-2fxf-qj94-3f83
Apache JSPWiki XSS due to crafted request on XHRHtml2Markup.jsp
Medium Also affects org.apache.jspwiki:jspwiki-main
GHSA-hph8-29xw-qfxx
Apache JSPWiki XSS due to crafted request in WeblogPlugin
Medium Also affects org.apache.jspwiki:jspwiki-main
GHSA-ggjq-8c4c-68r5
Apache JSPWiki XSS due to incomplete patch for CVE-2021-40369
Medium Also affects org.apache.jspwiki:jspwiki-main
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor