GHSA-9qgp-9wwc-v29r CVE-2022-46158
PrestaShop has potential Information exposure in the upload directory
Medium
Packagist
- Severity
- 5.3 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.50%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 42.53% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
- CWE-862 Missing Authorization
- Fix
1.7.8.8- Upgrade prestashop/prestashop to this version or later
Description
Impact
Potential Information exposure in the upload directory.
Patches
Patch in PrestaShop 1.7.8.8
References
https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/87.html
Thanks to DZPATROL
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| prestashop/prestashop | < 1.7.8.8 |
1.7.8.8 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
prestashop/prestashop Packagist → 1.7.8.8
- composer
composer require prestashop/prestashop:^1.7.8.8
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.0 5.3
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CWE-862: Missing Authorization
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-w9f3-qc75-qgx9 PrestaShop has a stored XSS executable in customer service view | Critical | Also affects prestashop/prestashop |
| GHSA-35pf-37c6-jxjv PrestaShop has multiple stored XSS vulnerabilities via unprotected Template variables | Medium | Also affects prestashop/prestashop |
| GHSA-283w-xf3q-788v PrestaShop: Improper Use of Validation Framework | Medium | Also affects prestashop/prestashop |
| GHSA-67v7-3g49-mxh2 PrestaShop affected by time based enumeration in FO login form | Medium | Also affects prestashop/prestashop |
| GHSA-8xx5-h6m3-jr33 Presta Shop vulnerable to email enumeration | Low | Also affects prestashop/prestashop |
| GHSA-7pjr-2rgh-fc5g Anonymous PrestaShop customer can download other customers' invoices | Medium | Also affects prestashop/prestashop |
| GHSA-45vm-3j38-7p78 PrestaShop cross-site scripting via customer contact form in FO, through file upload | Medium | Also affects prestashop/prestashop |
| GHSA-3366-9287-7qpr Path disclosure in JavaScript variable | Medium | Also affects prestashop/prestashop |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor