Skip to content

GHSA-8xx5-h6m3-jr33 CVE-2025-51586

Presta Shop vulnerable to email enumeration

Low Packagist
Severity
4.2 / 10
Low · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.82%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 57.11% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-203 Observable Discrepancy
CWE-359 Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Fix
8.2.3
Upgrade prestashop/prestashop to this version or later

Description

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker with access to the back-office URL can manipulate the id_employee and reset_token parameters to enumerate valid back-office employee email addresses.

Impacted parties: Store administrators and employees: their email addresses are exposed. Merchants: risk of phishing, social engineering, and brute-force attacks targeting admin accounts.

Patches

PrestaShop 8.2.3

Workarounds

You must upgrade, or at least apply the changes from the PrestaShop 8.2.3 patch. More information: https://build.prestashop-project.org/news/2025/prestashop-8-2-3-security-release/

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
prestashop/prestashop
< 8.2.3
8.2.3

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

prestashop/prestashop Packagist → 8.2.3

composer
composer require prestashop/prestashop:^8.2.3

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 4.2

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy

The product behaves differently or sends different responses under different circumstances in a way that is observable to an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.

CWE-359: Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product does not properly prevent a person's private, personal information from being accessed by actors who either (1) are not explicitly authorized to access the information or (2) do not have the implicit consent of the person about whom the information is collected.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements: Identify and consult all relevant regulations for personal privacy. An organization may be required to comply with certain federal and state regulations, depending on its location, the type of business it conducts, and the nature of any private data it handles. Regulations may include Safe Harbor Privacy Framework [REF-340], Gramm-Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) [REF-341], Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) [REF-342], General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [REF-1047], California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) [REF-1048], and others.
  • Architecture and Design: Carefully evaluate how secure design may interfere with privacy, and vice versa. Security and privacy concerns often seem to compete with each other. From a security perspective, all important operations should be recorded so that any anomalous activity can later be identified. However, when private data is involved, this practice can in fact create risk. Although there are many ways in which private data can be handled unsafely, a common risk stems from misplaced trust. Programmers often trust the operating environment in which a program runs, and therefore believe that it is acceptable store private information on the file system, in the registry, or in other locally-controlled resources. However, even if access to certain resources is restricted, this does not guarantee that the individuals who do have access can be trusted.
  • Implementation, Operation: Some tools can automatically analyze documents to redact, strip, or "sanitize" private information, although some human review might be necessary. Tools may vary in terms of which document formats can be processed. When calling an external program to automatically generate or convert documents, invoke the program with any available options that avoid generating sensitive metadata. Some formats have well-defined fields that could contain private data, such as Exchangeable image file format (Exif), which can contain potentially sensitive metadata such as geolocation, date, and time [REF-1515] [REF-1516].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-w9f3-qc75-qgx9
PrestaShop has a stored XSS executable in customer service view
Critical Also affects prestashop/prestashop
GHSA-35pf-37c6-jxjv
PrestaShop has multiple stored XSS vulnerabilities via unprotected Template variables
Medium Also affects prestashop/prestashop
GHSA-283w-xf3q-788v
PrestaShop: Improper Use of Validation Framework
Medium Also affects prestashop/prestashop
GHSA-67v7-3g49-mxh2
PrestaShop affected by time based enumeration in FO login form
Medium Also affects prestashop/prestashop
GHSA-7pjr-2rgh-fc5g
Anonymous PrestaShop customer can download other customers' invoices
Medium Also affects prestashop/prestashop
GHSA-45vm-3j38-7p78
PrestaShop cross-site scripting via customer contact form in FO, through file upload
Medium Also affects prestashop/prestashop
GHSA-3366-9287-7qpr
Path disclosure in JavaScript variable
Medium Also affects prestashop/prestashop
GHSA-vr7m-r9vm-m4wf
PrestaShop XSS can be stored in DB from "add a message form" in order detail page (FO)
Medium Also affects prestashop/prestashop
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor