Skip to content

GHSA-958h-qp3x-q4gj CVE-2026-43883

AVideo: IDOR in PayPalYPT Plugin Allows Any Authenticated User to Cancel Arbitrary PayPal Subscription Agreements

Medium Packagist
Severity
4.2 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.20%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 9.93% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

plugin/PayPalYPT/agreementCancel.json.php cancels a PayPal billing agreement using an attacker-supplied agreement parameter without verifying that the authenticated user owns the agreement. A low-privilege authenticated user who learns or obtains another user's PayPal billing agreement ID can silently suspend the victim's recurring subscription, causing revenue loss to the platform and loss of paid service to the victim.

Details

AVideo's PayPalYPT plugin ships two near-duplicate endpoints that cancel a PayPal billing agreement. Only one of them enforces ownership:

  • plugin/PayPalYPT/PayPalAgreementCancel.json.php:19 — correctly requires either admin or the agreement's owner:

    if (!User::isAdmin() && !Subscription::isAgreementFromUser($_POST['agreement_id'], User::getId())) {
        $obj->msg = "Only the owner can delete his agreement";
        die(json_encode($obj));
    }
    
  • plugin/PayPalYPT/agreementCancel.json.php:9-26 — only checks User::isLogged() (in fact twice, redundantly) and then calls the cancellation directly:

    if (!User::isLogged()) { ... die; }              // line 9
    if (empty($_REQUEST['agreement'])) { ... die; }   // line 14
    if (!User::isLogged()) { ... die; }              // line 19 — duplicate; no ownership check
    $plugin = AVideoPlugin::loadPluginIfEnabled("PayPalYPT");
    $agreement = PayPalYPT::cancelAgreement($_REQUEST['agreement']);  // line 26
    

PayPalYPT::cancelAgreement() at plugin/PayPalYPT/PayPalYPT.php:548-566 resolves the agreement ID against PayPal and calls $createdAgreement->suspend($agreementStateDescriptor, $apiContext) unconditionally — the server does not verify that the logged-in user's users_id matches the owner recorded in PayPalYPT_log (or wherever the agreement was registered):

public static function cancelAgreement($agreement_id)
{
    ...
    $createdAgreement = self::getBillingAgreement($agreement_id);
    try {
        $createdAgreement->suspend($agreementStateDescriptor, $apiContext);
        return Agreement::get($createdAgreement->getId(), $apiContext);
    } catch (Exception $ex) {
        return false;
    }
}

The intended UI caller is subscriptions_list.php:84 which posts the current user's own agreement IDs — but the server accepts any agreement parameter from any logged-in user. Agreement IDs can leak via _error_log entries written in agreementCancel.json.php:34 and webhook.php during normal operation, via PayPal receipt emails, or via other administrative and payment-log screens. No CSRF token is required, but the root defect is missing authorization, not CSRF.

PoC

  1. Log in as any low-privilege user (registered subscriber, commenter, free-tier account created via signUp).

  2. Obtain the target's PayPal agreement ID (e.g., I-ABCD1234XYZ). This may come from server error logs, email receipts, admin/payment screens, or other disclosures.

  3. Send the request with the victim's agreement ID:

    curl -X POST 'https://target.example/plugin/PayPalYPT/agreementCancel.json.php' \
      -b 'PHPSESSID=<attacker_session>' \
      -d 'agreement=I-ABCD1234XYZ'
    
  4. Expected response:

    {"error":false,"msg":""}
    

    The victim's billing agreement is suspended at PayPal via Agreement::suspend() (PayPalYPT.php:560). The victim stops being billed; AVideo subsequently reflects the subscription as inactive.

Impact

  • Any authenticated user can silently cancel another user's active PayPal recurring billing agreement.
  • Revenue disruption for the platform operator — any affected subscribers stop being billed.
  • Service disruption for the victim — their paid subscription lapses.
  • The defect is purely an authorization gap; the sister endpoint PayPalAgreementCancel.json.php demonstrates that the owner/admin check was intentional for this action but was not applied to this duplicate.

Recommended Fix

Port the ownership check from the sister endpoint into agreementCancel.json.php:

if (!User::isAdmin() && !Subscription::isAgreementFromUser($_REQUEST['agreement'], User::getId())) {
    $obj->msg = "Only the owner can cancel this agreement";
    die(json_encode($obj));
}

Alternative, preferred remediation: delete the duplicate agreementCancel.json.php entirely and point the cancelAgreement() JS helper in subscriptions_list.php:84 at the already-protected PayPalAgreementCancel.json.php endpoint (sending the expected agreement_id POST field). While patching, also remove the redundant second User::isLogged() branch at line 19.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wwbn/avideo
<= 29.0
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 4.2

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
  • Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q
AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f
AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw
AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr
AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm
AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin
Critical Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx
WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor