GHSA-945v-v9p3-v5xw BIT-rclone-2026-79783 CVE-2026-79783 GO-2026-6190
rclone local `--metadata` applies attacker-controlled mode/uid - setuid binary planted from an untrusted remote
- Severity
- 2.0 / 10
- Low · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.23%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 13.55% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-732 Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
- Fix
1.74.4- Upgrade github.com/rclone/rclone to this version or later
Description
Summary
When writing an object with metadata, the local backend applies the source-supplied mode, uid, and gid verbatim: it parses mode as an octal integer and passes it straight into os.Chmod(o.path, os.FileMode(umode)), and passes uid/gid straight into os.Chown. The value is never masked to permission bits, so any value with Go's ModeSetuid (1<<23) or ModeSetgid (1<<22) bit set causes the setuid/setgid bit to be applied. Because both the file content and its metadata come from the (attacker-controlled) source remote, an attacker stores a binary of their choosing with mode = 40000755 (and uid = 0); when the victim runs rclone copy -M <remote>: /dest, rclone writes the attacker's binary and makes it setuid. If the victim runs rclone as root (typical for system backup/restore), the uid=0 chown plus setuid produces a root-owned setuid binary with attacker content — any local user then escalates to root. When rclone runs as a non-root service user, the planted setuid binary is owned by that user, giving any local user that user's privileges (lateral escalation / persistent backdoor).
Details
backend/local/metadata.go, writeMetadataToFile():
uid, hasUID := o.parseMetadataInt(m, "uid", 10)
gid, hasGID := o.parseMetadataInt(m, "gid", 10)
if hasUID {
...
err = os.Chown(o.path, uid, gid) // source-controlled owner, no same-uid guard
}
mode, hasMode := o.parseMetadataInt(m, "mode", 8)
if hasMode && mode >= 0 {
umode := uint(mode)
if umode <= math.MaxUint32 {
err = os.Chmod(o.path, os.FileMode(umode)) // <-- raw value; ModeSetuid/ModeSetgid NOT masked off
}
}
os.Chmod/os.FileMode honor ModeSetuid/ModeSetgid/ModeSticky. There is no &^ (os.ModeSetuid|os.ModeSetgid) mask and no check that the source is trusted, so an attacker-chosen mode string sets those bits on the freshly written, attacker-controlled file. (Note: a legitimate local source reports mode in unix st_mode layout e.g. 0106755, whose bit 1<<23 is unset, so honest copies happen to drop setuid — but the attacker supplies the Go-FileMode layout 40000755 directly, which sets it.)
PoC
- Get the official stable binary:
curl -fsSLO https://downloads.rclone.org/v1.74.3/rclone-v1.74.3-linux-amd64.zip
unzip -j rclone-v1.74.3-linux-amd64.zip '*/rclone' -d . # ./rclone -> v1.74.3
- Create a payload (the attacker-controlled binary content) and copy it with the malicious
modemetadata:
mkdir -p msrc mdst && cp /bin/true msrc/payload
./rclone copy -M --metadata-set mode=40000755 msrc mdst # 40000755 = Go FileMode setuid|0755
- Observe — the destination file is now setuid:
stat -c '%A %a' mdst/payload
-rwsr-xr-x 4755 # 's' = setuid bit SET on attacker binary
Variants: mode=20000755 → setgid (-rwxr-sr-x); mode=60000755 → both (-rwsr-sr-x). With rclone run as root and the source object also carrying uid=0/gid=0, the file is chown'd root:root, yielding a root-owned setuid binary executable by any local user.
Impact
A victim performing a metadata-preserving copy/restore (-M) from an untrusted or compromised remote installs an attacker-chosen executable with the setuid/setgid bit set. Run as root (system backup/restore, the common case for --metadata), this is a root-owned setuid root backdoor executable by any local user → local privilege escalation to root. Run as a non-root user, it is a setuid backdoor for that service account. The companion uid/gid application lets a root-run transfer also reassign ownership of written files arbitrarily.
Remediation
Mask special bits before applying mode from metadata — os.Chmod(o.path, os.FileMode(umode).Perm()) (or umode & 0o777) — and do not honor setuid/setgid/sticky from source metadata; gate uid/gid/setuid application behind an explicit opt-in (e.g. --local-metadata-set-ownership) that is off by default, and document that -M from untrusted remotes must not restore privileged bits. Regression test: copying an object with mode=40000755/uid=0 must produce a non-setuid, caller-owned file unless the opt-in is set.
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/rclone/rclone | < 1.74.4 |
1.74.4 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/rclone/rclone Go → 1.74.4
- go
go get github.com/rclone/rclone@v1.74.4 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 2.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Attack requirements
- Present
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Passive
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Not defined
- Scope
- X
CVSS 3.1 3.6
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
The product specifies permissions for a security-critical resource in a way that allows that resource to be read or modified by unintended actors.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: When using a critical resource such as a configuration file, check to see if the resource has insecure permissions (such as being modifiable by any regular user) [REF-62], and generate an error or even exit the software if there is a possibility that the resource could have been modified by an unauthorized party.
- Architecture and Design: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully defining distinct user groups, privileges, and/or roles. Map these against data, functionality, and the related resources. Then set the permissions accordingly. This will allow you to maintain more fine-grained control over your resources. [REF-207]
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
- Implementation, Installation: During program startup, explicitly set the default permissions or umask to the most restrictive setting possible. Also set the appropriate permissions during program installation. This will prevent you from inheriting insecure permissions from any user who installs or runs the program.
- System Configuration: For all configuration files, executables, and libraries, make sure that they are only readable and writable by the software's administrator.
- Documentation: Do not suggest insecure configuration changes in documentation, especially if those configurations can extend to resources and other programs that are outside the scope of the application.
- Installation: Do not assume that a system administrator will manually change the configuration to the settings that are recommended in the software's manual.
- Operation, System Configuration: Ensure that the software runs properly under the United States Government Configuration Baseline (USGCB) [REF-199] or an equivalent hardening configuration guide, which many organizations use to limit the attack surface and potential risk of deployed software.
- Implementation, System Configuration, Operation: When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to disable public access.
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq rclone: source object names can escape the configured root on upload | Medium | Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone |
| GHSA-2p48-j3qc-rx9f rclone: S3 multipart declared-length memory exhaustion | High | Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone |
| GHSA-p569-5gjg-9cmj rclone: RC per-server auth-proxy bypass | Critical | Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone |
| GHSA-xwwr-4h3p-r22c rclone serve s3: --auth-proxy without --auth-key authenticates nobody - full SigV4 signature bypass | Critical | Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone |
| GHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77 rclone: FTP cross-session auth-proxy backend confusion | High | Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone |
| GHSA-f8g7-2xjc-7mfh rclone: Directory metadata (chmod/chown/chtimes) applied through a planted symlink in rclone local --links escapes the destination | High | Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone |
| GHSA-p6m2-r3w9-mpxw rclone local: crafted Range request against a translated symlink panics (DoS) | Medium | Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone |
| GHSA-66hp-wgxq-6f5q rclone archive/zip: Zip Slip via unsanitized zip entry names lets a malicious archive escape its own namespace | Medium | Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone |
Credits: Nguyễn Tiến Thành (GitHub: vnth4nhnt)
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor