Skip to content

GHSA-92x6-h2gr-8gxq CVE-2017-16653

Symfony CSRF Vulnerability

Medium Packagist
Severity
5.9 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.49%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 74.03% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Fix
Available
3 packages have a fixed version

Description

An issue was discovered in Symfony before 2.7.38, 2.8.31, 3.2.14, 3.3.13, 3.4-BETA5, and 4.0-BETA5. The current implementation of CSRF protection in Symfony (Version >=2) does not use different tokens for HTTP and HTTPS; therefore the token is subject to MITM attacks on HTTP and can then be used in an HTTPS context to do CSRF attacks.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
symfony/security
>= 2.7.0, < 2.7.38
2.7.38
symfony/security
>= 2.8.0, < 2.8.31
2.8.31
symfony/security
>= 3.0.0, < 3.2.14
3.2.14
symfony/security
>= 3.3.0, < 3.3.13
3.3.13
symfony/security-csrf
>= 2.7.0, < 2.7.38
2.7.38
symfony/security-csrf
>= 2.8.0, < 2.8.31
2.8.31
symfony/security-csrf
>= 3.0.0, < 3.2.14
3.2.14
symfony/security-csrf
>= 3.3.0, < 3.3.13
3.3.13
symfony/symfony
>= 2.7.0, < 2.7.38
2.7.38
symfony/symfony
>= 2.8.0, < 2.8.31
2.8.31
symfony/symfony
>= 3.0.0, < 3.2.14
3.2.14
symfony/symfony
>= 3.3.0, < 3.3.13
3.3.13

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

symfony/security Packagist → 2.7.38

composer
composer require symfony/security:^2.7.38

symfony/security-csrf Packagist → 2.7.38

composer
composer require symfony/security-csrf:^2.7.38

symfony/symfony Packagist → 2.7.38

composer
composer require symfony/symfony:^2.7.38

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.0 5.9

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
  • Implementation: Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
  • Architecture and Design: Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
  • Architecture and Design: Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
  • Architecture and Design: Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same. Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
  • Architecture and Design: Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
  • Implementation: Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-2v3c-qxhr-7vpv
Symfony: Unbounded Recursion in the YAML Inline Lexer Lets a Single Document Crash the Process
High Also affects symfony/symfony
GHSA-r925-mgvr-h9cc
Symfony: ReDoS in HeaderUtils::split() Reachable Through the Cache-Control Request Header
High Also affects symfony/symfony
GHSA-h5x3-xfc9-m39h
Symfony: UrlGenerator Dot-Segment Encoding Skips Every Other Chained `../` or `./` → Generated URL Collapses Off-Route Under RFC 3986 Normalization
Medium Also affects symfony/symfony
GHSA-v3wm-qf9p-c549
Symfony: HtmlSanitizer URL Parser Deny Gates Underinclusive: Percent-Encoded BiDi Marks and Unicode Whitespace Bypass Visual-Spoofing Defense
Medium Also affects symfony/symfony
GHSA-rrj9-5q2j-4gvr
Symfony: Mailomat Mailer Webhook Parser Reads the HMAC Algorithm from the Request: Signature Algorithm Downgrade
Medium Also affects symfony/symfony
GHSA-38cx-cq6f-5755
Symfony: IpUtils::PRIVATE_SUBNETS Omits IPv6 Transition Forms (6to4, NAT64, Teredo, IPv4-compatible): SSRF Bypass in NoPrivateNetworkHttpClient
High Also affects symfony/symfony
GHSA-6h46-9jf5-q59x
Symfony: Security Firewall Bypass via failure_forward Subrequest: Unauthenticated Access to access_control-Protected GET Routes
High Also affects symfony/symfony
GHSA-x5qj-865h-mgvm
Symfony: HtmlSanitizer UrlAttributeSanitizer Misses URL Attributes
Medium Also affects symfony/symfony
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor