GHSA-88g2-r9rw-g55h CVE-2024-43785 RUSTSEC-2024-0364
gitoxide-core does not neutralize special characters for terminals
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Low · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.20%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 9.65% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-150 Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences
- Fix
- None yet
- No fixed version published
Description
Summary
The gix and ein commands write pathnames and other metadata literally to terminals, even if they contain characters terminals treat specially, including ANSI escape sequences. This sometimes allows an untrusted repository to misrepresent its contents and to alter or concoct error messages.
Details
gitoxide-core, which provides most underlying functionality of the gix and ein commands, does not neutralize newlines, backspaces, or control characters—including those that form ANSI escape sequences—that appear in a repository's paths, author and committer names, commit messages, or other metadata. Such text may be written as part of the output of a command, as well as appearing in error messages when an operation fails.
ANSI escape sequences are of particular concern because, when printed to a terminal, they can change colors, including to render subsequent text unreadable; reposition the cursor to write text in a different location, including where text has already been written; clear the terminal; set the terminal title-bar text to arbitrary values; render the terminal temporarily unusable; and other such operations.
The effect is mostly an annoyance. But the author of a malicious repository who can predict how information from the repository may be accessed can cause files in the repository to be concealed or otherwise misrepresented, as well as rewrite all or part of error messages, or mimic error messages convincingly by repositioning the cursor and writing colored text.
PoC
On a Unix-like system in a POSIX-compatible shell, run:
git init misleading-path
cd misleading-path
touch "$(printf '\033]0;Boo!\007\033[2K\r\033[91mError: Repository is corrupted. Run \033[96mEVIL_COMMAND\033[91m to attempt recovery.\033[0m')"
git add .
git commit -m 'Initial commit'
In the repository—or, if desired, in a clone of it, to show that this is exploitable by getting a user to clone an untrusted repository—run this command, which outputs entries in a three-column form showing type, hash, and filename:
gix tree entries
Although the output is of that form, it does not appear to be. Instead, the output in a terminal looks like this, colorized to appear to be an error message, with EVIL_COMMAND in another color, and with no other text:
Error: Repository is corrupted. Run EVIL_COMMAND to attempt recovery.
In some terminals, a beep or other sound will be made. In most terminals, the title bar text will be changed to Boo!, though in some shells this may be immediately undone when printing the prompt. These elements are included to showcase the abilities of ANSI escape sequences, but they are not usually themselves threats.
To see what is actually produced, gix tree entries can be piped to a command that displays special characters symbolically, such as less or cat -v if available.
BLOB e69de29bb2d1d6434b8b29ae775ad8c2e48c5391 ESC]0;Boo!^GESC[2K^MESC[91mError: Repository is corrupted. Run ESC[96mEVIL_COMMANDESC[91m to attempt recovery.ESC[0m
That shows the effect on gix tree entries, but various other commands are also affected, and the escape sequences and other special characters can also appear in non-path metadata, such as in the user.name used to create a commit.
Impact
For users who do not clone or operate in clones of untrusted repositories, there is no impact. Windows is much less affected than Unix-like systems due to limitations on what characters can appear in filenames, and because traditionally Windows terminals do not support as many ANSI escape sequences.
Because different gix and ein commands display different data in different formats, the author of a malicious repository must guess how it will be used, which complicates crafting truly convincing output, though it may be possible to craft a repository where gix clone fails to clone it but produces a misleading message.
Although this is mainly exploitable on systems other than Windows, in the ability to produce misleading output this superficially resembles CVE-2024-35197. But this is much more limited, because:
- The misleading output can only be made to go where the application is already sending output. Redirection is not defeated, and devices to access cannot be chosen by the attacker.
- The misleading output can only be take place when the application is already producing output. This limitation complicates the production of believable messages.
- Only terminals are affected. Even if a standard stream is redirected to another file or device, these special characters would not have a special effect, unless echoed later without sanitization.
- Reading and blocking cannot be performed.
- Applications other than the gitoxide
gixandeinexecutables are unaffected. The exception is if another application usesgitoxide-core. But this is explicitly discouraged in thegitoxide-coredocumentation and is believed to be rare.
Affected versions
crates.io
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| gitoxide | <= 0.41.0 |
No fix yet |
| gitoxide-core | <= 0.45.0 |
No fix yet |
| gitoxide-core | >= 0.0.0-0 |
No fix yet |
How to fix
No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- Present
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Passive
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- None
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
CVSS 3.1 2.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-150: Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences
The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could be interpreted as escape, meta, or control character sequences when they are sent to a downstream component.
How to prevent it
- Developers should anticipate that escape, meta and control characters/sequences will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- Implementation: While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
- Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
- Implementation: When using output from an LLM, neutralize or strip escape codes before redirecting output to the terminal or other rendering engine that would process the codes. The neutralization could require that the character be printable and/or allowable whitespace, such as a carriage return or newline. Be deliberate about what to allow.
- Build and Compilation: When using an LLM: during tokenizer training, suppress escape codes from the tokenizer's vocabulary. Depending on context, this could be accomplished by removing the codes from input to the tokenizer, or removing the map from the string to its token ID. It is generally unlikely that this removal would adversely affect the quality or correctness of what is generated, e.g. advice requests for terminal settings to change colors.
References
Advisories
Issue reports
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-fr8x-3vfx-f45h gix and gitoxide: unvalidated submodule name traverses out of .git/modules and redirects state() / open() to another repository | High | Also affects gitoxide |
| GHSA-pg4w-g64p-qwhj gix and gitoxide's symlinked .gitmodules are followed and parsed from outside of the repository | High | Also affects gitoxide |
| GHSA-2frx-2596-x5r6 gitoxide does not detect SHA-1 collision attacks | Medium | Also affects gitoxide |
| GHSA-7w47-3wg8-547c gix traversal outside working tree enables arbitrary code execution | High | Also affects gitoxide |
| GHSA-49jc-r788-3fc9 gix refs and paths with reserved Windows device names access the devices | Medium | Also affects gitoxide |
| GHSA-98p4-xjmm-8mfh gix-transport indirect code execution via malicious username | Medium | Also affects gitoxide |
| GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h Oh My Posh: Terminal escape sequence injection via unsanitized prompt segment data | Medium | Same weakness, CWE-150 |
| GHSA-4hmj-39m8-jwc7 OpenClaw has ACP CLI approval prompt ANSI escape sequence injection | Medium | Same weakness, CWE-150 |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor