Skip to content

GHSA-87m4-826x-3crx CVE-2026-45034

PHPSpreadsheet has a patch bypass for CVE-2026-34084

Critical Packagist
Severity
0.0 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.46%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 40.08% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data
Fix
1.30.5
Upgrade phpoffice/phpspreadsheet to this version or later

Description

Summary

CVE-2026-34084 was patched by the helper File::prohibitWrappers. The helper calls parse_url($filename, PHP_URL_SCHEME) and then checks is_string($scheme) && strlen($scheme) > 1 to reject stream wrappers such as phar://, php://, data:// or expect://. The check is not equivalent to "does the path contain a wrapper". When the input has the form phar:///path/file.phar/inner with three or more slashes after the scheme, parse_url returns boolean false instead of returning the scheme string. The is_string($scheme) branch is therefore skipped, the helper returns without throwing, and the caller proceeds. PHP's stream layer, however, still treats phar:///... as a valid phar wrapper and opens the underlying phar file. The result is that IOFactory::load($attackerPath) walks past the patch and still touches the phar wrapper. On PHP 7.x, simply reaching the phar wrapper via is_file is enough for PHP to automatically deserialize the phar metadata, which in turn invokes the magic methods __wakeup and __destruct of an attacker controlled object and gives full RCE. On PHP 8.x, automatic metadata deserialization for plain file ops was removed, so the chain at the PhpSpreadsheet layer reduces to a phar wrapper file read primitive, and RCE only resurfaces if the downstream consumer ever calls Phar::getMetadata.

Vulnerable code

The file vendor/phpoffice/phpspreadsheet/src/PhpSpreadsheet/Shared/File.php is byte identical across all six latest tags listed below:

public static function prohibitWrappers(string $filename): void
{
    $scheme = parse_url($filename, PHP_URL_SCHEME);
    if (is_string($scheme) && strlen($scheme) > 1) {
        throw new Exception("Stream wrappers are not permitted as file paths: {$filename}");
    }
}

For input phar://x/dummy.csv the call returns the string "phar" and the throw fires correctly. For input phar:///work/exploit.phar/dummy.csv the same call returns false and the throw is skipped, which is the bypass.

Confirmed affected versions

Tested on 2026-05-03. The prohibitWrappers source on disk is identical across all six tags.

Branch Latest tag PHP under test Result
1.x 1.30.4 7.4 bypass plus full RCE, gadget wrote marker file
2.1.x 2.1.16 8.3 bypass
2.4.x 2.4.5 8.3 bypass
3.10.x 3.10.5 8.3 bypass
5.6.x 5.6.0 8.3 bypass
5.7.x 5.7.0 8.3 bypass

Version 1.30.4 is the latest tag of the 1.x branch, which is the only branch that still supports PHP 7.x. Version 5.7.0 is the latest tag overall on Packagist at the time of testing.

No branch beyond 1.30.x allows any release before Php 8. For branches beyond 1.30.x, although the code identified above is in error, and will be corrected, it does not lead to any security exposure. That would require a Phar::getMetadata call, which is not present in PhpSpreadsheet. If possible and reasonable, the release notes for the fix on the other branches will include release-note: security.

Reproduction

Requires Docker only, no local PHP install. Run:

bash run.sh

The script does the following in order: build exploit.phar using php:7.4-cli with phar.readonly=0, install phpoffice/phpspreadsheet:5.7.0 through composer and run exploit.php on php:8.3-cli to show that the bypass still works against the latest tag, then install 1.30.4 and run again on php:7.4-cli to show the full RCE chain. All output is teed to evidence.txt.

exploit.php ships two controls. The negative control uses phar://x/dummy.csv to confirm that the patch still rejects the standard wrapper form. The positive control uses phar:///work/exploit.phar/dummy.csv to show that the three slash variant slips through. On PHP 7.4 the gadget writes the file pwned_marker containing the lines WAKEUP: phpspreadsheet-bypass and DESTRUCT: phpspreadsheet-bypass, which is the proof that attacker controlled code ran inside the victim process.

Suggested fix

Do not rely on parse_url to detect wrappers, because its behavior depends on the slash count and on the PHP version. Either of these is safe:

public static function prohibitWrappers(string $filename): void
{
    if (str_contains($filename, '://')) {
        throw new Exception("Stream wrappers are not permitted as file paths: {$filename}");
    }
}

Alternatively, run the path through realpath() first, since realpath returns false for any wrapper prefixed path.

Files in this report

  • build-phar.php: builds exploit.phar with a gadget object in its metadata.
  • exploit.php: main PoC, with the negative and positive controls.
  • exploit.phar: prebuilt phar, the gadget writes a marker when deserialized.
  • composer.json: spec used by composer to install the version under test.
  • run.sh: end to end reproducer through Docker.
  • evidence.txt: log captured from the most recent run.sh invocation.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
phpoffice/phpspreadsheet
< 1.30.5
1.30.5

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

phpoffice/phpspreadsheet Packagist → 1.30.5

composer
composer require phpoffice/phpspreadsheet:^1.30.5

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data

The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently ensuring that the resulting data will be valid.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: If available, use the signing/sealing features of the programming language to assure that deserialized data has not been tainted. For example, a hash-based message authentication code (HMAC) could be used to ensure that data has not been modified.
  • Implementation: When deserializing data, populate a new object rather than just deserializing. The result is that the data flows through safe input validation and that the functions are safe.
  • Implementation: Explicitly define a final object() to prevent deserialization.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make fields transient to protect them from deserialization. An attempt to serialize and then deserialize a class containing transient fields will result in NULLs where the transient data should be. This is an excellent way to prevent time, environment-based, or sensitive variables from being carried over and used improperly.
  • Implementation: Avoid having unnecessary types or gadgets (a sequence of instances and method invocations that can self-execute during the deserialization process, often found in libraries) available that can be leveraged for malicious ends. This limits the potential for unintended or unauthorized types and gadgets to be leveraged by the attacker. Add only acceptable classes to an allowlist. Note: new gadgets are constantly being discovered, so this alone is not a sufficient mitigation.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Employ cryptography of the data or code for protection. However, it's important to note that it would still be client-side security. This is risky because if the client is compromised then the security implemented on the client (the cryptography) can be bypassed.
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-2phh-27fw-q4gc
PhpSpreadsheet: SSRF whitelist bypass via unre-validated HTTP redirect in Drawing::setPath external image loading
Medium Also affects phpoffice/phpspreadsheet
GHSA-j2w7-387v-m2rq
PhpSpreadsheet ODS Reader: Unbounded number-rows-repeated → CPU & Memory Exhaustion (DoS)
High Also affects phpoffice/phpspreadsheet
GHSA-3x94-m842-937c
PhpSpreadsheet: XmlScanner Bypass via ISO-2022 Escape Sequences Allows XXE and Denial of Service
High Also affects phpoffice/phpspreadsheet
GHSA-rxj4-h86g-25gc
PhpSpreadsheet: XmlScanner Bypass via Double-Encoded unentity() TOCTOU Allows XXE and Denial of Service
High Also affects phpoffice/phpspreadsheet
GHSA-xh5m-36r6-47m3
PHPSpreadsheet: XLS/OLE sector-chain self-loop causes memory exhaustion
High Also affects phpoffice/phpspreadsheet
GHSA-2mrg-gjxq-2gvr
PHPSpreadsheet: Gnumeric reader unbounded gzip expansion causes memory exhaustion
High Also affects phpoffice/phpspreadsheet
GHSA-6hq5-7373-42rg
PHPSpreadsheet: SSRF bypass via HTTP redirect in WEBSERVICE() domain whitelist
High Also affects phpoffice/phpspreadsheet
GHSA-7c6m-4442-2x6m
PhpSpreadsheet has CPU Denial of Service via Unbounded Row Number in XLSX Row Dimensions
High Also affects phpoffice/phpspreadsheet
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor