Skip to content

GHSA-6gmq-8vp8-gcm6 CVE-2026-83610

xmldom: XML fragment injection via invalid EntityReference.nodeName during requireWellFormed serialization

Medium npm
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.59%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 48.21% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-116 Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
Fix
0.8.15
Upgrade @xmldom/xmldom to this version or later

Description

Summary

An EntityReference node can be created with an invalid, attacker-controlled name through Document.createEntityReference(name). When this node is serialized directly with:

serializer.serializeToString(ref, { requireWellFormed: true })

the invalid nodeName is emitted into the serialized XML fragment without validation or escaping.

This can produce real XML markup in the serialized output. In the proof of concept below, the serialized fragment contains <injected/>, and reparsing the fragment creates a real injected element.


Details

The issue appears to be in the serialization path for ENTITY_REFERENCE_NODE.

For several other node types, requireWellFormed: true performs specific validation checks before serialization. For example, comments, processing instructions, document types, and some character data cases are checked before being emitted.

However, for ENTITY_REFERENCE_NODE, the serializer appears to emit the node name directly in entity reference form:

case ENTITY_REFERENCE_NODE:
  buf.push('&', n.nodeName, ';');
  return null;

As a result, if nodeName contains characters that break out of the intended &name; structure, the serializer can emit additional XML markup.

For example, an entity reference created with the name:

safe; <injected/> &x

is serialized as:

&safe; <injected/> &x;

When this fragment is later parsed in an XML context, <injected/> becomes a real element.

This is especially surprising when { requireWellFormed: true } is used, because applications may reasonably treat this mode as the stricter or safer XML serialization mode.


Proof of Concept

Tested with:

@xmldom/xmldom@0.9.10
Node.js v24.18.0
Windows 10 / PowerShell
'use strict';

const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer, DOMParser } = require('@xmldom/xmldom');

const impl = new DOMImplementation();
const doc = impl.createDocument(null, 'root', null);
const serializer = new XMLSerializer();

function countInjected(fragment) {
  try {
    const parsed = new DOMParser().parseFromString(`<root>${fragment}</root>`, 'application/xml');
    return parsed.getElementsByTagName('injected').length;
  } catch (e) {
    return `PARSE_THROW ${e.name}: ${e.message}`;
  }
}

for (const name of [
  'safe',
  'safe; <injected/> &x',
  'x<injected',
  'x y'
]) {
  try {
    const ref = doc.createEntityReference(name);
    const xml = serializer.serializeToString(ref, { requireWellFormed: true });

    console.log(`[SERIALIZED] ${JSON.stringify(name)}: ${xml}`);
    console.log(`[INJECTED_COUNT] ${JSON.stringify(name)}: ${countInjected(xml)}`);
  } catch (e) {
    console.log(`[THROW] ${JSON.stringify(name)}: ${e.name}: ${e.message}`);
  }
}

Observed output:

[SERIALIZED] "safe": &safe;
[INJECTED_COUNT] "safe": 0

[SERIALIZED] "safe; <injected/> &x": &safe; <injected/> &x;
[INJECTED_COUNT] "safe; <injected/> &x": 1

[SERIALIZED] "x<injected": &x<injected;
[INJECTED_COUNT] "x<injected": 0

[SERIALIZED] "x y": &x y;
[INJECTED_COUNT] "x y": 0

Impact

An application that creates an EntityReference from attacker-controlled input and then serializes that node or XML fragment with requireWellFormed: true may produce XML containing attacker-controlled markup.

The impact is limited by two observations:

  1. The parser does not create EntityReference nodes from ordinary XML entity references.
  2. Appending an EntityReference node as an element child is rejected with a HierarchyRequestError.

The main affected scenario is applications that directly use createEntityReference(name) and then serialize the resulting node or fragment.

Fix Applied

Two complementary, non-breaking fixes. (1) document.createEntityReference(name) rejects an invalid Name at creation, closing the reachable creation vector by default — the opt-in serializer check alone cannot, since a later nodeName mutation would bypass a creation-only guard. (2) Under requireWellFormed, the serializer validates the EntityReference nodeName as a well-formed XML Name and throws InvalidStateError when it is not; a valid reference still serializes as &name;. Both ship on both maintained versions. The EntityReference / createEntityReference docs note that under requireWellFormed the nodeName is validated as an XML Name, and that xmldom does not expand entities. See the XML Name production.

⚠ Opt-in required. Protection is not automatic. Existing serialization calls remain vulnerable unless { requireWellFormed: true } is explicitly passed. Applications that serialize untrusted DOM content should audit all serializeToString() call sites and add it.

Proof of Concept - fixed path

'use strict';

const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom');

const impl = new DOMImplementation();
const doc = impl.createDocument(null, 'root', null);
const serializer = new XMLSerializer();

// Creation-time anchor (applied by default): an invalid XML Name is rejected at creation.
try {
  doc.createEntityReference('safe; <injected/> &x');
} catch (e) {
  console.log(`${e.name}`); // rejected at creation
}

// Default path (requireWellFormed omitted): because creation now rejects an ill-formed name,
// an ill-formed nodeName is only reachable via a post-creation mutation — and is emitted verbatim.
const ref = doc.createEntityReference('safe');
ref.nodeName = 'safe; <injected/> &x';
console.log(serializer.serializeToString(ref));
// -> &safe; <injected/> &x;   (injection present on the default path)

// Opt-in path: throws on the invalid nodeName.
try {
  serializer.serializeToString(ref, { requireWellFormed: true });
} catch (e) {
  console.log(`${e.name}`); // InvalidStateError
}

// A valid name still serializes as &name; under requireWellFormed.
const ok = doc.createEntityReference('valid');
console.log(serializer.serializeToString(ok, { requireWellFormed: true }));
// -> &valid;

Why the default stays verbatim

The creation-time anchor is applied by default, because it is classified non-breaking. The serializer check, by contrast, stays gated behind { requireWellFormed: true }: W3C DOM Parsing's require-well-formed flag defaults to false, and the browser XMLSerializer emits the nodeName verbatim in that default mode, so unconditionally throwing for an ill-formed EntityReference.nodeName would be an unjustified breaking change — which is why the default serialization path stays verbatim.

Residual limitation

The creation vector is closed by default — the non-breaking creation-time anchor — with no further deferred work. The residual is at serialization: the default path still emits an ill-formed nodeName verbatim, because the serializer check is opt-in via { requireWellFormed: true }.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
@xmldom/xmldom
>= 0.7.0, < 0.8.15
0.8.15
@xmldom/xmldom
>= 0.9.0, < 0.9.12
0.9.12
xmldom
<= 0.6.0
No fix yet

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

@xmldom/xmldom npm → 0.8.15

npm
npm install @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15
yarn
yarn add @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15
pnpm
pnpm add @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
Low
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output

The product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. As a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error. Alternately, use built-in functions, but consider using wrappers in case those functions are discovered to have a vulnerability.
  • Architecture and Design: If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated. For example, stored procedures can enforce database query structure and reduce the likelihood of SQL injection.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies.
  • Architecture and Design: In some cases, input validation may be an important strategy when output encoding is not a complete solution. For example, you may be providing the same output that will be processed by multiple consumers that use different encodings or representations. In other cases, you may be required to allow user-supplied input to contain control information, such as limited HTML tags that support formatting in a wiki or bulletin board. When this type of requirement must be met, use an extremely strict allowlist to limit which control sequences can be used. Verify that the resulting syntactic structure is what you expect. Use your normal encoding methods for the remainder of the input.
  • Architecture and Design: Use input validation as a defense-in-depth measure to reduce the likelihood of output encoding errors (see CWE-20).
  • Requirements: Fully specify which encodings are required by components that will be communicating with each other.
  • Implementation: When exchanging data between components, ensure that both components are using the same character encoding. Ensure that the proper encoding is applied at each interface. Explicitly set the encoding you are using whenever the protocol allows you to do so.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-x4fp-j954-r2f4
xmldom: End-tag Whitespace-Trim Regex ReDoS — quadratic backtracking in the 0.8.x end-tag parser
High Also affects @xmldom/xmldom
GHSA-vr34-hp96-76pp
xmldom: requireWellFormed DocType publicId/systemId validation is bypassable via an embedded line terminator
High Also affects @xmldom/xmldom
GHSA-jxjr-3g7g-3944
xmldom: requireWellFormed element/attribute name validation is bypassable via an embedded line terminator
High Also affects @xmldom/xmldom
GHSA-c7q8-3ch8-vqpv
xmldom: Processing Instruction Target Injection Bypasses requireWellFormed
High Also affects xmldom
GHSA-965w-775f-mr7g
xmldom: Quadratic-memory consumption
High Also affects xmldom
GHSA-93r5-fhx6-vmg9
xmldom: Quadratic-time parsing via the malformed-input recovery path — `parseElementStartPart` re-scan and `normalize()` adjacent-text merge
High Also affects xmldom
GHSA-8344-3jmq-59r6
xmldom: Quadratic-time attribute deduplication
High Also affects xmldom
GHSA-6mj3-qw4j-hgrw
xmldom: HTML raw-text closing-tag case mismatch causes output amplification
High Also affects @xmldom/xmldom
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor