Skip to content

GHSA-965w-775f-mr7g CVE-2026-83615

xmldom: Quadratic-memory consumption

High npm
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.59%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 48.21% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Fix
0.8.15
Upgrade @xmldom/xmldom to this version or later

Description

Summary

When an element declares a namespace prefix, xmldom copies the entire in-scope namespace map into a fresh object and keeps that copy on the element while it is open on the parse stack. A crafted document that nests N elements, each declaring one unique prefix, therefore drives the parser to hold on the order of N(N+1)/2 = O(N²) namespace-map entries at its peak, so a small, highly compressible input exhausts the heap. Parsing runs under default options on untrusted, network-delivered XML, so a sub-megabyte payload can OOM-crash the process before any application-level validation runs — an unauthenticated denial of service.

Details

appendElement performs the copy: _copy clones the current namespace map into a fresh object for each prefix-declaring element, and the copy is retained on that element's parse-stack entry:

if (localNSMap == null) {
    localNSMap = Object.create(null);
    _copy(currentNSMap, (currentNSMap = Object.create(null)));   // full copy of all ancestor prefixes
}
currentNSMap[nsPrefix] = localNSMap[nsPrefix] = value;
...
el.currentNSMap = currentNSMap;   // retained while the element is open on the parse stack

https://github.com/xmldom/xmldom/blob/08a22d78e4bc50f12ce9f5090b8d96ee6031ac7b/lib/sax.js#L467-L540

The copies stack: the element at depth i copies a map of size ~i, and every ancestor stays live on the parse stack until it closes, so at the deepest point Σi namespace entries are held at once. That peak is transient — the completed DOM retains only O(N), one small namespace map per node — but it is reached during parsing, which is what OOM-crashes the process.

Proof of Concept

A minimal document — N nested elements, each declaring one unique namespace prefix (no SAML wrapper needed):

const { DOMParser } = require('@xmldom/xmldom');

function build(n) {
  let open = '', close = '';
  for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) { open += `<a xmlns:p${i}="urn:${i}">`; close = '</a>' + close; }
  return `<r>${open}${close}</r>`;   // <r><a xmlns:p0="urn:0">...<a xmlns:p{n-1}="urn:{n-1}">...</a>...</r>
}

for (const n of [2000, 4000, 8000, 16000]) {
  const src = build(n);
  new DOMParser().parseFromString(src, 'text/xml');   // peak memory ~ O(n^2)
  console.log(n, (src.length / 1024).toFixed(0) + ' KB in', (process.resourceUsage().maxRSS / 1024).toFixed(0) + ' MB peak RSS');
}

Measured on Node.js v24 (peak RSS ~quadruples per doubling of depth; absolute numbers vary by host):

depth input peak RSS
2,000 56 KB 266 MB
4,000 115 KB 622 MB
8,000 232 KB 1.9 GB
16,000 ~470 KB OOM crash (default ~4 GB heap)

About 470 KB of trivially-generated, highly-compressible input crashes a default Node.js process; larger depths scale as O(N²) into the tens of GB, crashing larger hosts (as first measured by the reporter with a SAML-shaped payload).

Impact

Unauthenticated denial of service against any service that parses attacker-influenced XML with xmldom under default options. A single sub-megabyte request drives multi-gigabyte peak memory and can OOM-crash the process before any application-level validation (e.g. schema checks or a SAML signature verification) runs. The payload is a plain namespace-nesting document and highly compressible, so it is effective over compressed transports (e.g. an HTTP-Redirect / DEFLATE binding, not only POST bindings).

Severity note

The CVSS 4.0 vector scores availability only (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H): the flaw neither discloses nor alters data, it exhausts the heap. VA:H is justified because a single unauthenticated, network-delivered request (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N) of trivial complexity (AC:L/AT:N) drives the parser to multi-gigabyte peak memory and OOM-crashes the process before any application-level logic runs — a full loss of availability for the affected service.

Fix Applied

Inherit each element's in-scope namespace map through the prototype chain instead of copying it for every prefix-declaring element, so a deeply namespaced document holds O(N) namespace entries instead of O(N²) at peak. Behavior-preserving: serialized output is byte-identical, only the memory cost drops. Non-breaking and independent of requireWellFormed; ships on both maintained versions.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
@xmldom/xmldom
>= 0.7.0, < 0.8.15
0.8.15
@xmldom/xmldom
>= 0.9.0, < 0.9.12
0.9.12
xmldom
>= 0.1.5, <= 0.6.0
No fix yet

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

@xmldom/xmldom npm → 0.8.15

npm
npm install @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15
yarn
yarn add @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15
pnpm
pnpm add @xmldom/xmldom@0.8.15

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements: Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.
  • Architecture and Design: Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.
  • Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place, and it will help the administrator to identify who is committing the abuse. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, typically by using increasing time delays uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution can be difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply requires more resources on the part of the attacker.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: If the program must fail, ensure that it fails gracefully (fails closed). There may be a temptation to simply let the program fail poorly in cases such as low memory conditions, but an attacker may be able to assert control before the software has fully exited. Alternately, an uncontrolled failure could cause cascading problems with other downstream components; for example, the program could send a signal to a downstream process so the process immediately knows that a problem has occurred and has a better chance of recovery. Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
  • Operation, Architecture and Design: Use quotas or other resource-limiting settings provided by the operating system or environment. For example, when managing system resources in POSIX, setrlimit() can be used to set limits for certain types of resources, and getrlimit() can determine how many resources are available. However, these functions are not available on all operating systems. When the current levels get close to the maximum that is defined for the application (see CWE-770), then limit the allocation of further resources to privileged users; alternately, begin releasing resources for less-privileged users. While this mitigation may protect the system from attack, it will not necessarily stop attackers from adversely impacting other users. Ensure that the application performs the appropriate error checks and error handling in case resources become unavailable (CWE-703).

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-x4fp-j954-r2f4
xmldom: End-tag Whitespace-Trim Regex ReDoS — quadratic backtracking in the 0.8.x end-tag parser
High Also affects @xmldom/xmldom
GHSA-vr34-hp96-76pp
xmldom: requireWellFormed DocType publicId/systemId validation is bypassable via an embedded line terminator
High Also affects @xmldom/xmldom
GHSA-jxjr-3g7g-3944
xmldom: requireWellFormed element/attribute name validation is bypassable via an embedded line terminator
High Also affects @xmldom/xmldom
GHSA-c7q8-3ch8-vqpv
xmldom: Processing Instruction Target Injection Bypasses requireWellFormed
High Also affects xmldom
GHSA-93r5-fhx6-vmg9
xmldom: Quadratic-time parsing via the malformed-input recovery path — `parseElementStartPart` re-scan and `normalize()` adjacent-text merge
High Also affects xmldom
GHSA-8344-3jmq-59r6
xmldom: Quadratic-time attribute deduplication
High Also affects xmldom
GHSA-6mj3-qw4j-hgrw
xmldom: HTML raw-text closing-tag case mismatch causes output amplification
High Also affects @xmldom/xmldom
GHSA-6h8r-xr42-gp59
xmldom: Parser silently accepts a not-well-formed end tag whose name is followed by a line break and trailing content
Medium Also affects xmldom
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor