GHSA-4mr5-g6f9-cfrh CVE-2026-47392 PYSEC-2026-463 PYSEC-2026-483
PraisonAI vulnerable to sandbox escape via `print.__self__` builtins module leak in `execute_code` (subprocess mode)
- Severity
- 9.9 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.88%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 59.23% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Fix
- Available
- 2 packages have a fixed version
Description
Summary
execute_code() in praisonaiagents/tools/python_tools.py (v1.6.37, subprocess sandbox mode) can be fully bypassed using print.__self__ to retrieve the real Python builtins module, from which __import__ can be extracted via vars() and runtime string construction. This achieves arbitrary OS command execution on the host, completely defeating the sandbox.
This is a novel bypass that survives all patches for CVE-2026-39888 (frame traversal), CVE-2026-34938 (str subclass), and CVE-2026-40158 (type.__getattribute__ trampoline).
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H — 9.9 Critical
Root Cause
Three independent gaps in the AST-based security validation:
Gap 1: __self__ missing from _blocked_attrs
In CPython, all built-in functions (C-level functions) have a __self__ attribute that returns the module they belong to. The built-in functions in safe_builtins (print, len, range, etc.) are the real CPython built-in functions, so print.__self__ returns <module 'builtins' (built-in)>.
The _blocked_attrs frozenset (line 52) does NOT include __self__. The AST check at line 74 only blocks attributes that are IN this set, so print.__self__ passes.
Gap 2: vars not blocked as callable or attribute
builtins.vars(obj) returns obj.__dict__. The function name vars is not in the AST Call blocklist (line 83: only blocks exec, eval, compile, __import__, open, input, breakpoint, setattr, delattr, dir). And vars is not in _blocked_attrs for attribute access.
So b.vars(b) (where b is the builtins module) returns builtins.__dict__ — a dict containing ALL built-in functions including __import__, exec, eval, open, etc.
Gap 3: AST Call check only catches ast.Name nodes
The dangerous-call check (line 82-88) only fires when isinstance(func, ast.Name) — i.e., bare-name calls like exec(...). It does NOT catch:
- Attribute calls:
b.exec(...)— func isast.Attribute - Subscript calls:
d["exec"](...)— func isast.Subscript
Gap 4: Runtime string construction bypasses string constant check
The string constant check (line 92-98) catches literals like "__import__", but NOT runtime concatenation like "_" + "_" + "import" + "_" + "_". The AST sees 5 separate Constant nodes ("_", "_", "import", "_", "_"), none of which contain any blocked attr as a substring.
Proof of Concept
from praisonaiagents.tools.python_tools import execute_code
# Exploit: 4 lines, bypasses ALL security layers
payload = """
b = print.__self__
d = b.vars(b)
key = "_" + "_" + "import" + "_" + "_"
imp = d[key]
mod = imp("os")
print(mod.popen("id").read())
"""
result = execute_code(code=payload)
print(result)
# Output: {'result': None, 'stdout': 'uid=1000(user) gid=1000(user) ...\n', 'stderr': '', 'success': True}
Step-by-step bypass analysis:
| Line | AST node | Check | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
print.__self__ |
Attribute(attr='__self__') |
__self__ in _blocked_attrs? |
NO → passes |
b.vars |
Attribute(attr='vars') |
vars in _blocked_attrs? |
NO → passes |
b.vars(b) |
Call(func=Attribute) |
isinstance(func, ast.Name)? |
NO → passes |
"_", "import" |
Constant(value=str) |
Contains blocked attr? | NO → passes |
d[key] |
Subscript |
Not checked | passes |
imp("os") |
Call(func=Name('imp')) |
imp in blocked calls? |
NO → passes |
Result: Full sandbox escape → arbitrary command execution
Impact
An attacker who can influence agent input (via prompt injection, malicious documents, or direct code submission) can:
- Execute arbitrary commands on the host system
- Read/write any file accessible to the process
- Exfiltrate environment variables, API keys, and credentials
- Pivot to internal networks
- Install persistent backdoors
Affected
- Package:
praisonaiagents(PyPI) - Affected versions: All versions through 1.6.37 (latest)
- Component:
praisonaiagents/tools/python_tools.py,_execute_code_sandboxed()function - Default configuration affected: Yes (
sandbox_mode="sandbox"is the default)
Remediation
Immediate fix
Add __self__ to _blocked_attrs:
_blocked_attrs = frozenset({
...,
'__self__', # Built-in functions leak their parent module
})
Additional hardening
- Block
varsin the callable blocklist - Extend the
ast.Callcheck to also catchast.Attributeandast.Subscriptfunction nodes - Add AST check for
BinOpstring concatenation that could construct blocked attr names
Fundamental recommendation
Denylist-based Python sandboxes are fundamentally insecure. Each patch introduces a new bypass opportunity. Consider:
- Using
isolated-vm(Node.js) or WebAssembly-based isolation - Using OS-level sandboxing (seccomp, namespaces, gVisor)
- Removing in-process code execution entirely in favor of containerized execution
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| praisonai | < 4.6.40 |
4.6.40 |
| praisonaiagents | < 1.6.40 |
1.6.40 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
praisonai PyPI → 4.6.40
- pip
pip install --upgrade "praisonai>=4.6.40"- poetry
poetry add "praisonai>=4.6.40"- uv
uv add "praisonai>=4.6.40"
praisonaiagents PyPI → 1.6.40
- pip
pip install --upgrade "praisonaiagents>=1.6.40"- poetry
poetry add "praisonaiagents>=1.6.40"- uv
uv add "praisonaiagents>=1.6.40"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 9.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs
The product implements a protection mechanism that relies on a list of inputs (or properties of inputs) that are not allowed by policy or otherwise require other action to neutralize before additional processing takes place, but the list is incomplete.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: Do not rely exclusively on detecting disallowed inputs. There are too many variants to encode a character, especially when different environments are used, so there is a high likelihood of missing some variants. Only use detection of disallowed inputs as a mechanism for detecting suspicious activity. Ensure that you are using other protection mechanisms that only identify "good" input - such as lists of allowed inputs - and ensure that you are properly encoding your outputs.
CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure
The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-26mh-57q7-jfvr PraisonAI vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Broken AST Sandbox | High | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-6g6r-q6gw-w8fg PraisonAI has a Browser Server WebSocket origin validation bypass via unanchored regex (patch bypass of CVE-2026-40289 / GHSA-8x8f-54wf-vv92) | Critical | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-pvph-5j39-v8qc PraisonAI: Origin-validation bypass (startswith prefix match) enables unauthenticated cross-site request forgery against the PraisonAI MCP HTTP server | High | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-gfq8-hmph-9gjv PraisonAI: Authentication fail-open in Recipe server allows unauthenticated access when API key or JWT auth is configured without a secret | High | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-2jgc-f764-c5r2 PraisonAI: [Auth Bypass] PraisonAI async Jobs API (`/api/v1/runs`) has no authentication — unauthenticated job execution, result theft, cancel and delete | High | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-gxmw-5f7x-6g22 praisonaiagents vulnerable to arbitrary file write via unsanitized `user_id` in `FileMemory.__init__()` — path traversal to any writable location | High | Also affects praisonaiagents |
| GHSA-pvxx-r596-f5qj PraisonAI: `--api-key` flag on `praisonai serve` is not properly enforced | High | Also affects praisonai |
| GHSA-hmfx-4v44-9qw9 PraisonAI vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery via DNS rebinding bypass in webhook_url validation | Medium | Also affects praisonai |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor