Skip to content

GHSA-4m69-67m6-prqp CVE-2026-52736

Zebra has block suppression via NU5 same-header body poisoning of sent-hash cache

High crates.io
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.61%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 49.22% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-459 Incomplete Cleanup
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Description

Am I affected

You are affected if:

  1. You run any version of zebrad up to and including v4.4.1.
  2. Your node accepts inbound P2P connections (network.listen_addr is set, which is the default).
  3. Your node processes blocks past the checkpoint height (non-finalized state is active).

All default configurations are affected.

Summary

Zebra records a block hash in non_finalized_block_write_sent_hashes when the block is sent to the write task, before contextual validation completes. If validation fails, the hash is not removed. A remote unauthenticated peer can deliver a poisoned block body that shares a header hash with a later valid canonical block. The poisoned body is rejected, but the hash remains cached. When the valid canonical block arrives, Zebra treats it as a duplicate and rejects it. The node cannot advance past that height until restart or a reorg event.

Details

ZIP-244 defines txid_v5 without binding transparent input scriptSig, which lives in auth_digest and is committed to by hashBlockCommitments in the block header. Because merkle_root is computed over txids (not auth digests), and the block hash is computed over the header, an attacker can construct two blocks with identical header hashes but different transaction bodies by mutating the coinbase scriptSig.

The attack flow over P2P:

  1. Attacker observes a new block header (from any peer).
  2. Attacker constructs a poisoned body by flipping a byte of the coinbase scriptSig extra-data section. The block hash is unchanged.
  3. Attacker advertises the block hash via inv to the target node.
  4. Target requests the block via getdata; attacker serves the poisoned body.
  5. Zebra adds the hash to non_finalized_block_write_sent_hashes before validation.
  6. The write task rejects the body at block_commitment_is_valid_for_chain_history (auth_data_root mismatch).
  7. The hash is not removed from non_finalized_block_write_sent_hashes.
  8. When the valid canonical block arrives (from honest peers or RPC), queue_and_commit_to_non_finalized_state sees the hash in the cache and returns KnownBlock::WriteChannel duplicate.
  9. The node is stuck at height N-1.

A secondary variant exists where chain pruning (via MAX_NON_FINALIZED_CHAIN_FORKS) removes a chain from chain_set but leaves its block hashes in non_finalized_block_write_sent_hashes, producing the same lockout for children of the pruned fork.

Patches

Patched in Zebra 4.4.2. The fix removes stale entries from non_finalized_block_write_sent_hashes on every failed non-finalized write path.

Workarounds

There is no complete configuration-level workaround. Reducing the node's inbound peer count (network.peerset_initial_target_size) narrows the attack surface but does not eliminate it. Restarting the node clears the in-memory cache and allows the valid block to be re-fetched.

Impact

A remote unauthenticated P2P peer can permanently stall a targeted Zebra node at a specific block height. The node diverges from the network tip; downstream consumers (lightwalletd, wallets, explorers, mining infrastructure) relying on the node see a stalled chain. The attack requires winning a propagation race: delivering the poisoned block body before honest peers deliver the canonical block. A well-positioned attacker (low-latency connection to the target, observation of new blocks from other peers) can reliably win this race. In sustained form, the attacker repeats for each new block, keeping the target permanently behind.

Recovery requires restarting the node (which clears the in-memory sent-hash cache) or waiting for a reorg at the affected height (rare on the canonical chain).

Credit

Reported independently by @ipwning (primary, with ZIP-244 malleability analysis and zcashd cross-reference) and @x15-eth (first reporter, with E2E reproduction and control experiment).

Affected versions

crates.io

PackageVulnerableFixed in
zebra-state
< 7.0.0
7.0.0
zebrad
< 4.5.0
4.5.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

zebra-state crates.io → 7.0.0

cargo
cargo update -p zebra-state --precise 7.0.0

zebrad crates.io → 4.5.0

cargo
cargo update -p zebrad --precise 4.5.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-459: Incomplete Cleanup

The product does not properly "clean up" and remove temporary or supporting resources after they have been used.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Temporary files and other supporting resources should be deleted/released immediately after they are no longer needed.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-ww9q-8r59-xv46
Zebra: Missing copy constraint in halo2_gadgets variable-base scalar multiplication allows under-constrained base, breaking Orchard Action circuit soundness
Critical Also affects zebrad
GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8
Zebra Address Book Aborted by IPv4-Mapped Mempool Misbehavior Update
High Also affects zebrad
GHSA-65jj-fmw8-468q
zebrad has unbounded memory leak in mempool download pipeline via timeout path cancel_handles retention
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-2gf8-q9rr-jq3h
zebrad has persistent on-disk corruption of Sapling/Orchard subtree roots after chain fork via pop_tip
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-hhm7-qrv5-h4r6
Zebra: Repeated Non-Finalized Shielded Transaction Aborts Zebra Before Duplicate-Nullifier Rejection
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-w834-cf6p-9m9w
Zebra: Finalized address balance credit-first overflow on consensus-valid blocks
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-gvjc-3w7c-92jx
Zebra has sync restart poisoning from single unauthenticated peer via above-lookahead block
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx
zebrad has consensus divergence via P2SH sigop undercount in pure-Rust disabled-opcode parser
Critical Also affects zebrad
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor