Skip to content

GHSA-49mx-fj45-q3p6 CVE-2025-61917

n8n's Unsafe Buffer Allocation Allows In-Process Memory Disclosure in Task Runner

High npm
Severity
7.7 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.40%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 34.22% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-668 Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere
Fix
1.114.3
Upgrade n8n to this version or later

Description

Impact

The use of Buffer.allocUnsafe() and Buffer.allocUnsafeSlow() in the task runner allowed untrusted code to allocate uninitialized memory. Such uninitialized buffers could contain residual data from within the same Node.js process (for example, data from prior requests, tasks, secrets, or tokens), resulting in potential information disclosure.

Only authenticated users are able to execute code through Task Runners.

This issue affected any deployment in which both of the following conditions were met:

  • Task Runners were enabled using N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED=true (default: false)
  • Code Node was enabled (default: true)

Patches

Access to unsafe Buffer functions has been removed from the task runner sandbox. All buffer allocations are now zero-filled by default.

  • Fixed in: 1.114.3 & 1.115.0
  • Action: It is strongly recommended to upgrade to version ≥ 1.114.3 as soon as possible.

Changes introduced in this patch include:

  • Routing all buffer allocations through Buffer.alloc (which zero-fills) operations where applicable
  • Adding regression tests to ensure continued enforcement of safe allocation practices

Workarounds

If an immediate upgrade cannot be applied, the following hardening steps are recommended:

  • Disable the Code Node by adding n8n-nodes-base.code to the NODES_EXCLUDE environment variable
  • Prefer external mode for isolation: run Task Runners in external mode so that untrusted task code executes in a separate sidecar container rather than within the main n8n process. This configuration significantly reduces the risk of in-process memory disclosure caused by unsafe buffer allocations.
    In external mode, a launcher manages Task Runner processes in a dedicated sidecar environment, separate from the primary n8n instance.
    See the n8n documentation for configuration details and required environment variables.

Resources

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
n8n
>= 1.65.0, < 1.114.3
1.114.3

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

n8n npm → 1.114.3

npm
npm install n8n@1.114.3
yarn
yarn add n8n@1.114.3
pnpm
pnpm add n8n@1.114.3

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.7

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere

The product exposes a resource to the wrong control sphere, providing unintended actors with inappropriate access to the resource.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-v98v-ff95-f3cp
n8n Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Expression Injection
High Known exploited Also affects n8n
GHSA-qgpw-8g46-w95v
n8n: Git Node branch.<name>.remote Config Key Bypasses Sandbox Path Restriction, Enabling Local Git Repository Read
Medium Also affects n8n
GHSA-65xw-2v52-jhxc
n8n: Cross-User Active Workflow ID and Lifecycle Event Disclosure via Missing userId Filter
Medium Also affects n8n
GHSA-pq6c-vh67-xpm3
n8n: Log Streaming Event Destinations Decrypt Generic-Auth Credentials Without Ownership Check
Medium Also affects n8n
GHSA-cqr2-h44g-v75v
n8n: Cross-Tenant Project-Member PII Disclosure via Missing Per-Project Scope Check on Role Assignment Endpoints
Medium Also affects n8n
GHSA-pf83-w3f9-8m37
n8n: Disabled OIDC SSO Endpoints Remain Active and Issue Valid Sessions
Medium Also affects n8n
GHSA-6xcw-7xm6-48c6
n8n: Expression Sandbox Escape via Shared Builtin Tampering and Code-Printer Injection Leads to Code Execution
High Also affects n8n
GHSA-34ff-336r-5q23
n8n: Domain-Restriction Bypass via Unguarded Model-Search Endpoint in OpenAI Chat Model Node
Medium Also affects n8n
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor