Skip to content

GHSA-452v-w3gx-72wg CVE-2026-41584

Zebra has rk Identity Point Panic in Transaction Verification

High crates.io
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.27%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 19.01% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-617 Reachable Assertion
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

rk Identity Point Panic in Transaction Verification

Summary

Orchard transactions contain a rk field which is a randomized validating key and also an elliptic curve point. The Zcash specification allows the field to be the identity (a "zero" value), however, the orchard crate which is used to verify Orchard proofs would panic when fed a rk with the identity value. Thus an attacker could send a crafted transaction that would make a Zebra node crash.

Severity

Critical - This is a Denial of Service Vulnerability that could allow an attacker to crash Zebra nodes.

Affected Versions

All Zebra versions prior to version 4.3.1.

Description

The vulnerability exists in the circuits.rs file of the orchard crate; it attempts to get the coordinates of the rk value and calls unwrap() on the results, which causes a panic if rk is the identity.

Zebra parses rk as a byte vector; it creates an Orchard "bundle" using the orchard crate and then calls the same crate to verify it, triggering the panic.

An attacker could exploit this by:

  1. Creating a transaction with a identity rk
  2. Submitting it to a Zebra node, making it crash

Impact

Denial of Service

  • Attack Vector: Network.
  • Effect: Node crash.
  • Scope: Any impacted Zebra node.

Fixed Versions

This issue is fixed in Zebra 4.3.1.

The fix was agreed with zcashd developers (which has the same issue) to not allow the identity rk anymore and change the specification as such. Zebra now does this when parsing a transaction. This was deemed easier than fixing the issue in orchard, which would make the bug public before the nodes could be patched.

Mitigation

Users should upgrade to Zebra 4.3.1 or later immediately.

There are no known workarounds for this issue. Immediate upgrade is the only way to ensure the node remains not vulnerable to denial of service.

Credits

Thanks to Alex “Scalar” Sol for finding and reporting the issue.

Affected versions

crates.io

PackageVulnerableFixed in
zebra-chain
< 6.0.2
6.0.2
zebrad
< 4.3.1
4.3.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

zebra-chain crates.io → 6.0.2

cargo
cargo update -p zebra-chain --precise 6.0.2

zebrad crates.io → 4.3.1

cargo
cargo update -p zebrad --precise 4.3.1

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
High

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-617: Reachable Assertion

The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Make sensitive open/close operation non reachable by directly user-controlled data (e.g. open/close resources)
  • Implementation: Perform input validation on user data.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-ww9q-8r59-xv46
Zebra: Missing copy constraint in halo2_gadgets variable-base scalar multiplication allows under-constrained base, breaking Orchard Action circuit soundness
Critical Also affects zebrad
GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8
Zebra Address Book Aborted by IPv4-Mapped Mempool Misbehavior Update
High Also affects zebrad
GHSA-65jj-fmw8-468q
zebrad has unbounded memory leak in mempool download pipeline via timeout path cancel_handles retention
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-2gf8-q9rr-jq3h
zebrad has persistent on-disk corruption of Sapling/Orchard subtree roots after chain fork via pop_tip
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-hhm7-qrv5-h4r6
Zebra: Repeated Non-Finalized Shielded Transaction Aborts Zebra Before Duplicate-Nullifier Rejection
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-w834-cf6p-9m9w
Zebra: Finalized address balance credit-first overflow on consensus-valid blocks
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-gvjc-3w7c-92jx
Zebra has sync restart poisoning from single unauthenticated peer via above-lookahead block
Medium Also affects zebrad
GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx
zebrad has consensus divergence via P2SH sigop undercount in pure-Rust disabled-opcode parser
Critical Also affects zebrad
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor