GHSA-3wwx-63fv-pfq6 BIT-cilium-2024-47825 BIT-cilium-operator-2024-47825 BIT-hubble-relay-2024-47825 CVE-2024-47825 GO-2024-3208
Cilium's CIDR deny policies may not take effect when a more narrow CIDR allow is present
- Severity
- 4.0 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.40%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 33.90% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Fix
1.15.10- Upgrade github.com/cilium/cilium to this version or later
Description
Impact
A policy rule denying a prefix that is broader than /32 may be ignored if there is
- A policy rule referencing a more narrow prefix (
CIDRSetortoFQDN) and - This narrower policy rule specifies either
enableDefaultDeny: falseor- toEntities: all
Note that a rule specifying toEntities: world or toEntities: 0.0.0.0/0 is insufficient, it must be to entity all.
As an example, given the below policies, traffic is allowed to 1.1.1.2, when it should be denied:
apiVersion: cilium.io/v2
kind: CiliumClusterwideNetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: block-scary-range
spec:
endpointSelector: {}
egressDeny:
- toCIDRSet:
- cidr: 1.0.0.0/8
---
apiVersion: cilium.io/v2
kind: CiliumNetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: evade-deny
spec:
endpointSelector: {}
egress:
- toCIDR:
- 1.1.1.2/32
- toEntities:
- all
Patches
This issue affects:
- Cilium v1.14 between v1.14.0 and v1.14.15 inclusive
- Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.9 inclusive
This issue has been patched in:
- Cilium v1.14.16
- Cilium v1.15.10
Workarounds
Users with policies using enableDefaultDeny: false can work around this issue by removing this configuration option and explicitly defining any allow rules required.
No workaround is available to users with egress policies that explicitly specify toEntities: all.
Acknowledgements
The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @squeed, @christarazi, and @jrajahalme for their work in triaging and resolving this issue.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on Slack.
If you think you have found a vulnerability affecting Cilium, we strongly encourage you to report it to our security mailing list at security@cilium.io. This is a private mailing list for the Cilium security team, and your report will be treated with top priority.
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/cilium/cilium | >= 1.15.0, < 1.15.10 |
1.15.10 |
| github.com/cilium/cilium | >= 1.14.0, < 1.14.16 |
1.14.16 |
| github.com/cilium/cilium | >= 1.14.0, < 1.14.16>= 1.15.0, < 1.15.10 |
1.14.161.15.10 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/cilium/cilium Go → 1.15.10
- go
go get github.com/cilium/cilium@v1.15.10 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 4.0
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-1038: Insecure Automated Optimizations
The product uses a mechanism that automatically optimizes code, e.g. to improve a characteristic such as performance, but the optimizations can have an unintended side effect that might violate an intended security assumption.
CWE-276: Incorrect Default Permissions
During installation, installed file permissions are set to allow anyone to modify those files.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: The architecture needs to access and modification attributes for files to only those users who actually require those actions.
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-fm8w-2m5w-9j7r Cilium may unexpectedly allow ingress traffic from the local namespace when a Kubernetes NetworkPolicy is configured with an ipBlock match | Medium | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-w7c2-w76w-5hmj Cilium: Namespaced HTTPRoutes can redirect traffic to other namespaces | High | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-q6h5-q3q6-f87x CiliumLocalRedirectPolicy addressMatcher allows cross-namespace service traffic hijacking and can break service translation | Medium | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-3fcv-jvfp-m4q9 Cilium vulnerable to sensitive information disclosure and cluster disruption via local Envoy admin socket access | High | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-gj49-89wh-h4gj Cillium exposes sensitive information included in the cilium-bugtool debug archive | Medium | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-hxv8-4j4r-cqgv Cilium L7 proxy may bypass Kubernetes NetworkPolicy for same-node traffic | Medium | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-5r23-prx4-mqg3 Cilium may not enforce host firewall policies when Native Routing, WireGuard and Node Encryption are enabled | Medium | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
| GHSA-38pp-6gcp-rqvm Cilium with misconfigured toGroups in policies can lead to unrestricted egress traffic | Medium | Also affects github.com/cilium/cilium |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor