GHSA-3pmh-24wp-xpf4 CVE-2025-67715 PYSEC-2025-233
Weblate has Systematic User and Project Enumeration via Broken Authorization in REST API (IDOR)
Medium
PyPI
- Severity
- 4.3 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.27%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 19.64% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Fix
5.15- Upgrade weblate to this version or later
Description
Impact
It was possible to retrieve user notification settings or list all users via API.
Patches
References
Thanks to Hector Ruiz Ruiz & NaxusAI for responsibly disclosing this vulnerability to Weblate.
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| weblate | < 5.15 |
5.15 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
weblate PyPI → 5.15
- pip
pip install --upgrade "weblate>=5.15"- poetry
poetry add "weblate>=5.15"- uv
uv add "weblate>=5.15"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 4.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-284: Improper Access Control
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CWE-285: Improper Authorization
The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that you perform access control checks related to your business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that you apply to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-2q2q-jr9g-v9rf Weblate has IDOR in GroupViewSet that allows authenticated project manager to gain unauthorized read access to any private project | High | Also affects weblate |
| GHSA-2p9g-x3cv-5hh4 Private Weblate projects vulnerable to observable object existence disclosure via globally scoped object lookups | Medium | Also affects weblate |
| GHSA-vmfc-9982-2m45 Weblate SSRF: outbound URL guard misses some private ranges | Medium | Also affects weblate |
| GHSA-6wxc-8mgq-w26m Weblate: Stored HTML injection in editor search preview | Medium | Also affects weblate |
| GHSA-5cmv-3rc4-7279 Weblate vulnerable to XSS via crafted Markdown | Medium | Also affects weblate |
| GHSA-gcg5-86jr-f7jg Weblate Vulnerable to Private Translation Enumeration via Screenshot API | Medium | Also affects weblate |
| GHSA-cwcx-382v-8m9g Weblate Vulnerable to Authenticated SSRF via Project Backup Import bypassing validate_repo_url | High | Also affects weblate |
| GHSA-6j8j-4qp3-36p2 Weblate Doesn't Invalidate API Token on Password Change | Medium | Also affects weblate |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor