Skip to content

GHSA-3hjv-c53m-58jj CVE-2026-41264

Flowise: CSV Agent Prompt Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Critical npm
Severity
0.0 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.79%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 78.35% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-184 Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Abstract

Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative has identified a vulnerability affecting FlowiseAI Flowise.

Vulnerability Details

Analysis

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of FlowiseAI Flowise. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.

The specific flaw exists within the run method of the CSV_Agents class. The issue results from the lack of proper sandboxing when evaluating an LLM-generated Python script. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the user running the server.

Product Information

FlowiseAI Flowise version 3.0.13 — https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise

Setup Instructions

npm install -g flowise@3.0.13
npx flowise start

Root Cause Analysis

FlowiseAI Flowise is an open source low-code tool for developers to build customized large language model (LLM) applications and AI agents. It supports integration with various LLMs, data sources, and tools in order to facilitate rapid development and deployment of AI solutions. Flowise offers a web interface with a drag-and-drop editor, as well as an API, through an Express web server accessible over HTTP on port 3000/TCP.

One such feature of Flowise is the ability to create chatflows. Chatflows use a drag-and-drop editor that allows a developer to place nodes which control how an interaction with an LLM will occur. One such node is the CSV Agent node that represents an Agent used to answer queries on a provided CSV file.

When a user makes a query against a chatflow using the CSV Agent node, the run method of the CSV_Agents class is called. This method first reads the contents of the CSV file passed to the node and converts it to a base64 string. It then sets up a pyodide environment and creates a Python script to be executed in this environment. This Python script uses pandas to extract the column names and their types from the provided CSV file. The method then creates a system prompt for an LLM using this data as follows:

You are working with a pandas dataframe in Python. The name of the dataframe is df.

The columns and data types of a dataframe are given below as a Python dictionary with keys showing column names and values showing the data types.
{dict}

I will ask question, and you will output the Python code using pandas dataframe to answer my question. Do not provide any explanations. Do not respond with anything except the output of the code.

Security: Output ONLY pandas/numpy operations on the dataframe (df). Do not use import, exec, eval, open, os, subprocess, or any other system or file operations. The code will be validated and rejected if it contains such constructs.

Question: {question}
Output Code:

Where {dict} is the extracted column names and {question} is the initial prompt provided by the user.

This system prompt is sent to an LLM in order for it to generate a Python script based on the user's prompt, and the LLM-generated response is stored in a variable named pythonCode. The method then evaluates the pythonCode variable in a pyodide environment.

While the LLM-generated Python script is evaluated in a non-sandboxed environment, there is a list of forbidden patterns that are checked before the script is executed on the server. The function validatePythonCodeForDataFrame() enumerates through a list named FORBIDDEN_PATTERNS, which contains pairs of regex patterns and reasons. Each regex pattern is run against the Python script, and if the pattern is found in the script, the script is invalidated and is not run, responding to the request with a reason for rejection.

The input validation can be bypassed, which can still lead to running arbitrary OS commands on the server. An example of this is the pattern /\bimport\s+(?!pandas|numpy\b)/g, which intends to search for lines of code that import a module other than pandas or numpy. This can be bypassed by importing along with pandas or numpy. For example, consider the following lines of code:

import pandas as np, os as pandas
pandas.system("xcalc")

Here, pandas is imported, but so is the os module, with pandas as its alias. OS commands can then be invoked with pandas.system().

Using prompt injection techniques, an unauthenticated attacker with the ability to send prompts to a chatflow using the CSV Agent node may convince an LLM to respond with a malicious Python script that executes attacker-controlled commands on the Flowise server.

It is also possible for an authenticated attacker to exploit this vulnerability by specifying an attacker-controlled server in a chatflow. This server would respond to prompts with an attacker-controlled Python script instead of an LLM-generated response, which would then be evaluated on the server.

Relevant Source Code

packages/components/nodes/agents/CSVAgent/core.ts
import type { PyodideInterface } from 'pyodide'
import * as path from 'path'
import { getUserHome } from '../../../src/utils'

let pyodideInstance: PyodideInterface | undefined

export async function LoadPyodide(): Promise<PyodideInterface> {
    if (pyodideInstance === undefined) {
        const { loadPyodide } = await import('pyodide')
        const obj: any = { packageCacheDir: path.join(getUserHome(), '.flowise', 'pyodideCacheDir') }
        pyodideInstance = await loadPyodide(obj)
        await pyodideInstance.loadPackage(['pandas', 'numpy'])
    }

    return pyodideInstance
}

export const systemPrompt = `You are working with a pandas dataframe in Python. The name of the dataframe is df.

The columns and data types of a dataframe are given below as a Python`*

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
flowise
< 3.1.0
3.1.0
flowise-components
< 3.1.0
3.1.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

flowise npm → 3.1.0

npm
npm install flowise@3.1.0
yarn
yarn add flowise@3.1.0
pnpm
pnpm add flowise@3.1.0

flowise-components npm → 3.1.0

npm
npm install flowise-components@3.1.0
yarn
yarn add flowise-components@3.1.0
pnpm
pnpm add flowise-components@3.1.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 9.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs

The product implements a protection mechanism that relies on a list of inputs (or properties of inputs) that are not allowed by policy or otherwise require other action to neutralize before additional processing takes place, but the list is incomplete.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Do not rely exclusively on detecting disallowed inputs. There are too many variants to encode a character, especially when different environments are used, so there is a high likelihood of missing some variants. Only use detection of disallowed inputs as a mechanism for detecting suspicious activity. Ensure that you are using other protection mechanisms that only identify "good" input - such as lists of allowed inputs - and ensure that you are properly encoding your outputs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-w7x8-q2gp-5cgg
Flowise Prompt Injection to RCE and SSRF via CSV/Airtable Agent Python Validator Bypass
Critical Also affects flowise
GHSA-9gvv-qjj3-2p6g
Flowise NodeVM sandbox escape via puppeteer allowlist - authenticated RCE and arbitrary file read via Chromium
High Also affects flowise
GHSA-qgvm-j2hm-6m38
Flowise: Unauthenticated OAuth2 token refresh endpoint returns access tokens — enables token theft for any connected service
Critical Also affects flowise
GHSA-5xvg-pmgg-3mxr
Flowise: CSV Agent Prompt Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Critical Also affects flowise
GHSA-gmmw-qg98-6j6p
Flowise: Broken Access Control in Stripe Subscription Endpoints Allows Cross-Tenant Billing Manipulation
High Also affects flowise
GHSA-8gj2-2cvc-6xx7
Flowise: Unauthenticated Credential Abuse via Text-to-Speech Endpoint Allows Unauthorized Use of Private Chatflow TTS Credentials
Medium Also affects flowise
GHSA-fm2f-4339-4p2f
Flowise: Missing Authorization on Execution Update Endpoint
Medium Also affects flowise
GHSA-wch5-xp77-fxg4
Flowise: Cross-Workspace OAuth2 Credential Metadata Leak
High Also affects flowise
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor