Skip to content

GHSA-38rh-4v39-vfxv CVE-2026-34737

AVideo: Arbitrary Stripe Subscription Cancellation via Debug Endpoint and retrieveSubscriptions() Bug

Medium Packagist
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.29%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 21.17% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

The StripeYPT plugin includes a test.php debug endpoint that is accessible to any logged-in user, not just administrators. This endpoint processes Stripe webhook-style payloads and triggers subscription operations, including cancellation. Due to a bug in the retrieveSubscriptions() method that cancels subscriptions instead of merely retrieving them, any authenticated user can cancel arbitrary Stripe subscriptions by providing a subscription ID.

Details

At plugin/StripeYPT/test.php:4, the endpoint checks only for a logged-in user, not for admin privileges:

if (!User::isLogged())

At lines 27-29, the endpoint accepts a JSON payload from the request and processes it through the Stripe metadata handler:

$obj = StripeYPT::getMetadataOrFromSubscription(json_decode($_REQUEST['payload']));

The call chain proceeds as follows:

  • test.php calls getMetadataOrFromSubscription()
  • Which calls getSubscriptionId() to extract the subscription ID
  • Which calls retrieveSubscriptions() to interact with the Stripe API

At StripeYPT.php:933, the retrieveSubscriptions() method contains a critical bug where it cancels the subscription instead of just retrieving it:

$response = $sub->cancel();

This same bug also affects the production webhook processing path via processSubscriptionIPN(), meaning both the debug endpoint and the live webhook handler can trigger unintended cancellations.

Proof of Concept

  1. Log in as any regular (non-admin) user and obtain a session cookie.

  2. Send a crafted payload to the test endpoint with a target subscription ID:

curl -b "PHPSESSID=USER_SESSION" \
  "https://your-avideo-instance.com/plugin/StripeYPT/test.php" \
  -d 'payload={"data":{"object":{"id":"sub_TARGET_SUBSCRIPTION_ID","customer":"cus_CUSTOMER_ID"}}}'
  1. The endpoint processes the payload, calls retrieveSubscriptions(), and the subscription is cancelled via the Stripe API.

  2. To enumerate subscription IDs, check if the application exposes them through other endpoints or use predictable patterns:

# Check user subscription details if accessible
curl -b "PHPSESSID=USER_SESSION" \
  "https://your-avideo-instance.com/plugin/StripeYPT/listSubscriptions.php"
  1. The Stripe subscription is now cancelled. The affected user loses access to their paid features.

Impact

Any logged-in user can cancel arbitrary Stripe subscriptions belonging to other users. This causes direct financial damage to the platform operator (lost subscription revenue) and service disruption for paying subscribers who lose access to premium features. The debug endpoint should have been removed from production or restricted to admin-only access, and the retrieveSubscriptions() method should retrieve rather than cancel subscriptions.

  • CWE-862: Missing Authorization
  • Severity: Medium

Recommended Fix

Two changes are needed:

1. Restrict the debug endpoint to admins at plugin/StripeYPT/test.php:4:

// plugin/StripeYPT/test.php:4
if (!User::isAdmin())

Change User::isLogged() to User::isAdmin() so only administrators can access the debug endpoint.

2. Fix the retrieval bug at StripeYPT.php:933:

Remove the $sub->cancel() call from retrieveSubscriptions() so that the function only retrieves subscription data without cancelling it:

// StripeYPT.php:933 - remove the following line:
// $response = $sub->cancel();

The retrieveSubscriptions() method should retrieve subscription information, not cancel subscriptions as a side effect.


Found by aisafe.io

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wwbn/avideo
<= 26.0
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q
AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f
AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw
AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr
AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm
AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin
Critical Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx
WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor