Skip to content

GHSA-25qr-6mpr-f7qx BIT-rclone-2026-41176 CVE-2026-41176 GO-2026-4964

Rclone: Unauthenticated options/set allows runtime auth bypass, leading to sensitive operations and command execution

Critical Go
Severity
0.0 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
32.71%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 98.35% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Fix
1.73.5
Upgrade github.com/rclone/rclone to this version or later

Description

Summary

The RC endpoint options/set is exposed without AuthRequired: true, but it can mutate global runtime configuration, including the RC option block itself. An unauthenticated attacker can set rc.NoAuth=true, which disables the authorization gate for many RC methods registered with AuthRequired: true on reachable RC servers that are started without global HTTP authentication. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive administrative functionality, including configuration and operational RC methods.

Preconditions

Preconditions for this vulnerability are:

  • The rclone remote control API must be enabled, either by the --rc flag or by running the rclone rcd server
  • The remote control API must be reachable by the attacker - by default rclone only serves the rc to localhost unless the --rc-addr flag is in use
  • The rc must have been deployed without global RC HTTP authentication - so not using --rc-user/--rc-pass/--rc-htpasswd/etc

Details

The root cause is present from v1.45 onward. Some higher-impact exploitation paths became available in later releases as additional RC functionality was introduced.

The issue is caused by two properties of the RC implementation:

  1. options/set is exposed without AuthRequired: true
  2. the RC server enforces authorization for AuthRequired calls using the mutable runtime value s.opt.NoAuth

Relevant code paths:

  • fs/rc/config.go

    • registers options/set without AuthRequired: true
    • rcOptionsSet reshapes attacker-controlled input into global option blocks
  • fs/rc/rcserver/rcserver.go

    • request handling checks:
      • if !s.opt.NoAuth && call.AuthRequired && !s.server.UsingAuth()
    • once rc.NoAuth is changed to true, later AuthRequired methods become callable without credentials

This creates a runtime auth-bypass primitive on the RC interface.

After setting rc.NoAuth=true, previously protected administrative methods become callable, including configuration and operational endpoints such as:

  • config/listremotes
  • config/dump
  • config/get
  • operations/list
  • operations/copyfile
  • core/command

Relevant code for the second-stage command execution path:

  • fs/metadata.go

    • metadataMapper() uses exec.Command(...)
  • fs/operations/rc.go

    • operations/copyfile is normally AuthRequired: true
    • once rc.NoAuth=true, it becomes reachable without credentials

This was validating using the following:

  • current master as of 2026-04-14: bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82
  • latest public release tested locally: v1.73.4

The issue was also verified on a public amd64 Ubuntu host controlled by the tester, using direct host execution (not containerized PoC execution).

PoC

Minimal reproduction

Start a vulnerable server:

rclone rcd --rc-addr 127.0.0.1:5572

No --rc-user, no --rc-pass, no --rc-htpasswd.

First confirm that a protected RC method is initially blocked:

curl -sS -X POST http://127.0.0.1:5572/config/listremotes \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  --data '{}'

Expected result: HTTP 403.

Use unauthenticated options/set to disable the auth gate:

curl -sS -X POST http://127.0.0.1:5572/options/set \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  --data '{"rc":{"NoAuth":true}}'

Expected result: HTTP 200 {}

Then call the same protected method again without credentials:

curl -sS -X POST http://127.0.0.1:5572/config/listremotes \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  --data '{}'

Expected result: HTTP 200 with a JSON response such as:

{"remotes":[]}

Testing performed

This was successfully reproduced:

  • on the tester's ocal test environment
  • on a public amd64 Ubuntu host controlled by the tester

Using the public host, the following was confirmed:

  • unauthenticated options/set successfully set rc.NoAuth=true
  • previously protected RC methods became callable without credentials
  • the issue was reproducible through direct host execution

Impact

This is an authorization bypass on the RC administrative interface.

It can allow an unauthenticated network attacker, on a reachable RC deployment without global HTTP authentication, to disable the intended auth boundary for protected RC methods and gain access to sensitive configuration and operational functionality.

Depending on the enabled RC surface and runtime configuration, this can further enable higher-impact outcomes such as local file read, credential/config disclosure, filesystem enumeration, and command execution.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/rclone/rclone
>= 1.45.0, < 1.73.5
1.73.5
github.com/rclone/rclone
< 1.73.5
1.73.5

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/rclone/rclone Go → 1.73.5

go
go get github.com/rclone/rclone@v1.73.5 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
High
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 9.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability. Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port. In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Architecture and Design: Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks. In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
  • Implementation, System Configuration, Operation: When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq
rclone: source object names can escape the configured root on upload
Medium Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone
GHSA-2p48-j3qc-rx9f
rclone: S3 multipart declared-length memory exhaustion
High Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone
GHSA-p569-5gjg-9cmj
rclone: RC per-server auth-proxy bypass
Critical Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone
GHSA-xwwr-4h3p-r22c
rclone serve s3: --auth-proxy without --auth-key authenticates nobody - full SigV4 signature bypass
Critical Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone
GHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77
rclone: FTP cross-session auth-proxy backend confusion
High Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone
GHSA-f8g7-2xjc-7mfh
rclone: Directory metadata (chmod/chown/chtimes) applied through a planted symlink in rclone local --links escapes the destination
High Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone
GHSA-p6m2-r3w9-mpxw
rclone local: crafted Range request against a translated symlink panics (DoS)
Medium Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone
GHSA-66hp-wgxq-6f5q
rclone archive/zip: Zip Slip via unsanitized zip entry names lets a malicious archive escape its own namespace
Medium Also affects github.com/rclone/rclone
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor