Skip to content

CVE-2026-81963

Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') in Windows Update Stack allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

High Known exploited
Severity
7.8 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.39%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 33.55% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
Yes
In CISA's catalog since Sep 8, 2026
Weakness
CWE-59 Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')
CWE-284 Improper Access Control
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published
Exploited in the wild. Microsoft Windows Link Following Vulnerability (Microsoft Windows). Required action: Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines. Due for U.S. federal agencies by Sep 22, 2026.

Description

Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') in Windows Update Stack allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')

The product attempts to access a file based on the filename, but it does not properly prevent that filename from identifying a link or shortcut that resolves to an unintended resource.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system. Denying access to a file can prevent an attacker from replacing that file with a link to a sensitive file. Ensure good compartmentalization in the system to provide protected areas that can be trusted.

CWE-284: Improper Access Control

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog
  2. Published
  3. Last updated by the source
  4. Remediation due for U.S. federal agencies
  5. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-hjqx-j4rw-g7xv
zip: Arbitrary file write outside the extraction directory, because ZipArchive::extract validates symlink targets lexically.
High Same weakness, CWE-59
GHSA-4vjg-vx72-qq4g
systeminformation has path traversal in Linux networkStats() that allows symlink-based file disclosure outside /sys/class/net
Low Same weakness, CWE-59
GHSA-9j6q-wvj5-jgjg
filelock: Symlink swap during SoftFileLock's writability check leaks whether a path exists and is writable by the lock taker
Low Same weakness, CWE-59
GHSA-j8f7-rjxc-mr56
filelock: ReadWriteLock follows a symlink at the lock path into SQLite
Medium Same weakness, CWE-59
GHSA-crv4-6mhj-j5jh
filelock: SoftFileLock stale-break restore follows a swapped-in symbolic link and hard-links a file of the user running the lock into the lock directory
Medium Same weakness, CWE-59
GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8
filelock ReadWriteLock: SQLite reopens the lock database by name, so a planted symlink or journal file makes the lock user's process overwrite or unlink its own files
High Same weakness, CWE-59
GHSA-gq48-pqfc-9p58
GitPython: Submodule.move() follows an attacker-committed intermediate symlink outside the worktree
Medium Same weakness, CWE-59
GHSA-2j93-m82w-73j2
Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2026-96231 - .NET and Visual Studio Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
High Same weakness, CWE-59
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor