CWE-1288: Improper Validation of Consistency within Input
Base
The product receives a complex input with multiple elements or fields that must be consistent with each other, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input is actually consistent.
Some input data can be structured with multiple elements or fields that must be consistent with each other, e.g. a number-of-items field that is followed by the expected number of elements. When such complex inputs are inconsistent, attackers could trigger unexpected errors, cause incorrect actions to take place, or exploit latent vulnerabilities.
Consequences
- Other: Varies by Context
How to prevent it
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Recent advisories
- GHSA-wcvj-vpvw-9rr5 — Keycloak Services has Improper Validation of Consistency within Input
- GHSA-hhq2-3832-xxcv — OpenStack Keystone has an Incorrect Authorization Issue
- CVE-2026-31431 — crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place
- GHSA-c65p-x677-fgj6 — vLLM has a Weakness in MultiModalHasher Image Hashing Implementation
- GHSA-5vmp-m5v2-hx47 — tough root metadata version is not checked for sequential versioning
- GHSA-crh6-fp67-6883 — xmldom allows multiple root nodes in a DOM
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor